It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sek82
At daybreak on May 6th, the contrail situation off the west coast seemed little bit different
Originally posted by Sek82
But the X pattern 'contrail' does not get enhanced. Why not?
Originally posted by Sek82
The rest of the contrails are clearly seen.
Originally posted by Sek82
I have believed that one of the best course of actions our country could have taken in defense of it would be to attempt to make it rain on a large scale over the pacific
And finally, if they really were "spraying", those chemicals would be all over every single thing outside. That includes your house, lawn, pool, cars, dog house, bushes, everything. That means if they really were spraying, anyone could get swabs of anything outside and have those swabs tested in a lab to prove once and for all that there was spraying going on.
Originally posted by UrgentInsurgent
That doesn´t make sense. you could swab anything, but it would not prove where it came from.
Originally posted by UrgentInsurgent
Where did you get that flight pattern pic? Could you direct me to a similar one, but above the Netherlands?
reply to post by _BoneZ_
I edited my post above. What I meant was you could swab anything outside and have it tested for aluminum and barium since the movie "What in the world are they spraying" implied that those elements were coming from "chemtrails". That means anything outside under the sky will have aluminum and barium on them if there were any real spraying going on. Not just a few ground samples like was done in the above movie.
Originally posted by UrgentInsurgent
Jeah....about that...still doesn´t make sense. I see you use this little part of your debunkofolio quite often around here....you should scrap it.
Originally posted by ledzeppelin489
You may want to check your numbers; 22,000 miles above the Earth? How do contrails form in space exactly? Weather forms within the troposhere, which is only extends to about 10 miles above the Earth.
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Jeah, I don't think that's going to happen. If "chemtrailers" are going to continue to insist that there's some sinisiter plot to spray the whole sky with some chemical(s), then whatever they're spraying will be all over every single thing outside. I don't know what part of that you don't understand.
Originally posted by Sek82
At daybreak on May 6th, the contrail situation off the west coast seemed little bit different, a little bit odd.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/df7d8b79ab80.gif[/atsimg]
If your train of thought is anything like mine, you may be thinking "X marks the spot".
Anyone care to guess the width of contrails such as these, nevermind the length? This is from 22,300 miles above earth, mind you - They began forming late the night before.
So then, knowing we have access to satellite imagery with cool contrail enhancing features, our X will be sure to stand out, since of course they should be normal, high altitude contrails, right? Note the many small contrails radiating out from the Bay Area.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/932751d86c7e.jpg[/atsimg]
But the X pattern 'contrail' does not get enhanced. Why not? Not high altitude, nor cold enough? The rest of the contrails are clearly seen.
Originally posted by firepilot
What is sinister about aircraft trails crossing at angles that appear to be 90 degrees? Would you be happier if those were changed to be 60 degrees?
Originally posted by UrgentInsurgent
Originally posted by firepilot
What is sinister about aircraft trails crossing at angles that appear to be 90 degrees? Would you be happier if those were changed to be 60 degrees?
I see, I have to break it down for some.
If one would want to lay a grid to cover an area, it would make sense to have intersections at 90 degree angles.
It seems that flight paths are somewhat straight lines from A to B for the biggest part.
It is a bit coincidental if locations A/B ,C/D, E/F and G/H have paths between them that intersect at 90 degree angles.
Especially when I see them at different parts of the sky at different times.
Originally posted by adigregorio
How did they get the sattelite to stay still for so long whilst it orbited the Earth?
I mean that is a time-lapse photo right? Or is it a photoshopped photo? Before mentioning the sattelites that are fixed, keep in mind that the entire planet rotates as well. So if that is a time lapse photo where are the other celestial objects? (Sun, moon, etc)
reply to post by firepilot
Why would you want a grid anyways? Do you think cropdusters spray in grids? Do you think insect control is done in grids? No actual spraying with aircraft like those uses a grid system.
Flight plans are not neccesarily all straight lines, unless ATC grants a direct clearance to destination, and you have a GPS to get you there.
Originally posted by Uncinus
The animation of ship trails is from a geostationary satellite (one that stays above a fixed point)