Originally posted by Sly1one
ok so we as the people who hire the president have a right to fact check every single nook and cranny of his life that corresponds with the JOB
QUALIFICATIONS in which we are hiring...
Allow me to list the “job qualifications” then, as per the Constitution (Article II Section 1 cl.
5): must be (1) a natural born citizen, (2) at least 35 years old and (3) a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
The first birth certificate released by Obama,
months before the election, was sufficient to answer the first two conditions. And the third had
already been answered, and was never disputed.
These are the only “job qualifications” prescribed by our Constitution. Obama fulfills them, and publicly showed proof of them — dispute not
being under any legal obligation to do so — months before the election.
Every single one of your allegations not related to these is extraneous and irrelevant, regardless of how you feel about Obama’s father, mother, his
childhood or academic performance.
at any time we the people can do this and for ANY REASON conspiracy theory or not...that is a condition of his employment as POTUS for WE THE
PEOPLE...
Don’t frame this as an attempt to prevent or opposing you for asking questions. I have never opposed people asking questions, nor
have I seen people advocating that no one should ask questions about this.
The point I, and others, are making is that questions were indeed asked, but they have been answered. They have been answered to the liking of every
reasonable and sane person.
But, and more importantly, they have been answered to the liking of the relevant authorities, especially Congress, that certified Obama’s election
without a single objection — last election that happened was 1996 — and no one in Congress has ever officially raised the issue, by demanding the
President to formally present his documents, initiate hearings or introduce legislation addressing it.
IF everything was answered with clear cut no BS answers in a timely manner with LEGITIMATE conclusive evidence and documentation then I think
this issue would die like the dead horse that it is
It was. The President doesn’t have to indulge every unreasonable or crazy demand a
minority of people ask of him.
If you remain unpersuaded by the documents presented so far, don’t vote for him. That’s how things work in a democratic system.
edit on 8-5-2011 by aptness because: (no reason given)