It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fox News reported OBL's death DAYS EARLIER!!!

page: 50
302
<< 47  48  49    51  52  53 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2011 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Epiphron
 


Twitter shows you the time stamp relative to YOUR time zone. when she posted it on the 28th she was on PT. now, she is with a sick family member in a state on ET, so when she looked it up now, her "relative time stamp" would have changed.
I can see how this COULD create confusion on her part as in " I guess I posted it later than I thought" only for her to retract it later.

and where was it established that she posted it at 10:43am? I saw where it was mentioned, but who said it first and what time zone were THEY in? the OP stated it was early evening. so, 7:43pm PT makes sense.
edit on 8-5-2011 by jazkaat because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 8 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by jazkaat
 


Except the pakistani guy was tweeting on the 30th, so, you still have a day in question



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:02 PM
link   
Interesting: from May 1st - scroll down the tweets to the date


keithurbahn So I'm told by a reputable person they have killed Osama Bin Laden. Hot damn. 1 May


(Urbahn is Chief of Staff, Office of Donald Rumsfeld, Navy Reserve intel officer) - Link


edit on 8-5-2011 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:04 PM
link   
while it looks like we may not get any clarification as to the fox ticker, ATS did succeed in blowing up the internet...AGAIN!

googled: april 28 fox news ticker



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:09 PM
link   
reply to post by ahmonrarh
 

Amazing. When I first joined this thread last night there were three. Then a fourth about an hour later.

This is very concerning and dangerous on one hand. There is now unsubstantiated information embedded in many minds as fact. But it is very good on the other hand. With more people looking, chances of finding the ticker increase. I believe the good outweighs the bad. Now how to track everything to find out the truth.

From DawnoftheGeek:

All we need is for someone to have recorded the news broadcast that day for empirical evidence. I can see no possible reason for this Twitter user to have posted this for fun, it wasn’t in the media spotlight like it is now or it wasn’t a talking point that this was going to be aired.


Indeed, this is all we need. Evidence.

I agree that it was probably not for fun.

I agree there is every possibility still open that she saw what she said she saw. Evidence seems to be accumulating that there was miscommunication (off topic but a lot of which has been posted here for further research and debunking).
edit on 5/8/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:10 PM
link   
reply to post by ahmonrarh
 




And isn't it funny that GLP have nicked the story too...



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by LosLobos

Can we get back to real conspiracies?


Here's a conspiracy for you.

If I start reading a thread and it's obvious that it is of no interest to me I stop reading and look elsewhere.

Why keep reading if you don't like the thread?

You protesteth too much.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by HumanPLC
Earlier on in this thread someone stumbled across a news story from the 28th via AFP that referred to the his death however i have not seen this mentioned again, is there some reason for this?

Here is the link to the article in question:

www.google.com...


Ive also embedded an image of the page, just incase it gets taken down...




Much Love
edit on 8/5/11 by HumanPLC because: added image of page/link


The date in question has to be wrong. Look at where the Dow was on 4-28-11 then look in the link you posted and where it stated it was at


The Dow closed at another new high of 12,763.31, up +72.35 (+0.57%) and intraday high of 12,776.14.


Source



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Something interesting.... just googled "BACKDATE TWITTER" and got a few hits.


Specifically this


twitter.com...#!/datatoy/status/1749334978


so maybe it IS possible to backdate...


Not that this changes that the news agencies also reported this.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by ahmonrarh
 




And isn't it funny that GLP have nicked the story too...

that made me feel all warm and fuzzy that GLP filter feeds from here...lol j/k.

and lucidity, there are pros and cons to this level of exposure...hopefully the good will substantiate what the OP posted here, since there are more eyes on it than just ours.

or, it will show that she....and i hate to say it....made a mistake.

when i first came on this thread, it was no where NEAR the amount of pages it is now...matter of fact, when i was google-ing vids just last night, the only hit i got were from this thread....4 links...all ats pages.

but if the OP wants to help, all we need to know is WHAT PROGRAM WERE YOU WATCHING....



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mikey84
I think I know how this happened,

On April 28th, it was reported (on many news sites) and on the Fox Ticker that they found plans that

"Al-Qaeda planned to unleash a nuclear disaster in Europe if Osama Bin Laden Killed" and

"Al Qaeda had hidden a nuclear bomb in Europe that would be detonated if Osama bin Laden was killed"

That was reported on the 28th, and on many stations before (just do a google search realtime and go back to the date and you can see people were talking about it).

So maybe the OP seen the ticker speed past and only caught the end that said "Osama Bin Laden Killed" or "Osama Bin Laden was killed" and tweeted about it.


Just my thought.

edit on 7/5/2011 by Mikey84 because: (no reason given)


Mikey84 hit the nail on the head with the above post on page 20. Why is this thread still going?

The OP was, in her own words, not really paying attention to the news and obviously mis-read the ticker and tweeted about it. Bin Laden actually being killed a few days later was just a big coincidence. The OP either realises that she mis-read the ticker in the first place and is just playing along now for the attention or she still genuinely believes she saw the 'Bin Laden is dead' ticker. Either way, she is obviously mistaken - it is the most logical explanation by far.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:20 PM
link   
I would like to suggest that anyone searching for relevant information try to use the advanced search options on google. The more we are investigating and posting on this, the more information we are creating pertaining to the subject. Some very vital information could be being buried as a result of increased hits on google. So try to refine your searches.

thanks.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:21 PM
link   
Lurch:

well, after seeing that post, i guess i'll leave it here for now.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 

Exactly.

Again, maybe the most important thing here is that more eyes are looking at this and that improves the odds of proving if it is true, which in turn will allow it to become a most critical piece of evidence in the time/date discrepancy.

I'm probably the only one that has a concern about what it means if it's never proven to be true but becomes part of the mythology that will feed disinformation. Hard to keep your eye on the greater good and tactical goals.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by ~Lucidity

Originally posted by Morpheas
Oh that makes sense.. PT 10:43, MT 11:43, CT 12:43, and ET 1:43... correct?


I believe what Morph is/was referring to is PT 10:43 AM, MT 11:43 AM, CT 12:43 PM, and ET 1:43 PM?


Originally posted by megneverlands

Originally posted by Morpheas
Oh that makes sense.. PT 10:43, MT 11:43, CT 12:43, and ET 1:43... correct?


I just checked the timestamp for myself and you are correct. I suppose I did post it later than I had thought. Which could mean two things now... I either saw the ticker later than I thought, around 10:43pm PST on April 28th (1:43am on the 29th EST), instead of between 6:30pm and 8pm, or I just posted it later and saw it earlier that evening. I wish I could remember the exact time I SAW the ticker! I was busy packing, worrying about my cousin, doing laundry and whatnot, and then getting ready for a royal wedding party for late that night / early morning of the 29th. It's a big hard for me to remember over a week later. Sorry that I'm not precise on the time. If it's any consolation, I'm overly confident of what I saw/read!


Hope this clears up the time issue.


The PT 10:43 AM, does not match the story you have told here in this ATS thread.

This is not personal. It's just attempting to discount all possibilities.

In addition? You posting a new Twitter right now so we can verify this time zone thing, on the off chance that you two are not the same person, will no longer now prove anything as you could adjust the time zone.

And if by chance this is some sort of hoax or hack job we cannot be certain that someone following this thread would not make that post, which the real person who owns Twitter megneverlands may or may not notice and may or may not take action about. Action like searching out this thread and maybe setting a higher level of privacy? Or maybe action like really joining ATS and posting here.

But I see that might be a moot point now anyway, as the page has a higher level of privacy set

Again, this is not personal. It's trying to eliminate all discrepancies. And this is really all you have, barring finding proof that this ticker was in fact shown.

Even other people now seeing this thread here in ATS or reposts anywhere else and claiming that they saw it tool will probably not help the case. Particularly as there's no additional information to corroborate (like which show it was) and there appears to be a time discrepancy in the timestamp on the tweet and the time you said it happened here.

Finally (for notw) if dantaylorjr wrote a tweet that both you and jeremyscahill retweeted, where is it? Where is dantaylorjr's original tweet. Where is your retweet of it? (I may have missed this.) And where is jeremyscahill's retweet of it? .

Sure we may not not exactly how Twitter works. But we're learning

edit on 5/8/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)


You are correct it was in the morning, early afternoon depending on time zone!!



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:31 PM
link   
It looks like who ever was messing with her account scared her away.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju



This screenshot was in the material i found in the hacked files.


I love that screenshot!

The reporter has that "Doh!" look on his face with the caption.



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:34 PM
link   
Guys, is there a thread dealing specifically dearling with and focused on the date/time issue? I've seen it mentioned in this thread, but did anyone create one? Thread title...simple question. When did the OBL raid occur?

We've seen it debated, sometimes with evidence and sometimes not, in almost every thread including this one.

If there isn't one, we need one. We can't attack this as a big messy pile. We have to chip away at it bit by bit so that our foundation for debunking the official story is more solid that the story is.


Originally posted by Morpheas
It looks like who ever was messing with her account scared her away.

That seems like the simple answer, yes.

But it may not be the answer.

I think we could well have a mission accomplished.
edit on 5/8/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by megneverlands

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by ~Lucidity
 



I think my assessment that Twitter megneverlands and ATS megneverlands may not be the same person is still in the running too, no? Still an unanswered question or two there.


Well I hate to say it, but "doxing" Megneverlands twitter account shows me her real name, her state, and age (she's pretty young) and phone number. It could be confirmed that it is indeed her, but I don't want to cross any lines about contacting a member in this fashion.


I don't know what you're doing to my Twitter account, but I'd appreciate it if you stopped. My real name doesn't need to be floating around the Internet. I don't know why I even bothered to post this. I was trying to get info out there, but all that's happened is I've been attacked.

I'm 24. That IS my Twitter account. Can we leave it at that? I'm not the one on trial here. We should be asking why Fox News had this on their ticker.


edit on 8-5-2011 by megneverlands because: (no reason given)


This Blackmarketeer guy scared her away.. Meg please come back and help us understand the timestamp issue.. Thanks



posted on May, 8 2011 @ 02:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Morpheas
 

Sorry, I added a reply to your post in my previous post as you were typing too. I'm not so sure.




top topics



 
302
<< 47  48  49    51  52  53 >>

log in

join