It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fox News reported OBL's death DAYS EARLIER!!!

page: 13
302
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:24 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.




posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Castaway65
reply to post by superman2012
 


Hey ASS the OP hasn't even responded to questions no need to answer your stupid question because there is NOTHING there except what your small mind sees..



Ok little man, it doesn't matter. You and your little buddy aren't responding to my questions, and you are actually here! What does that say about you? Now stop skirting the issue and start answering my questions or leave. Your questions have been answered.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


No need to debunk something that isn't there just the FACT that the OP is not responding is enough for any normal person,he or she is sitting back laughing at YOU and the rest of you..OO wait maybe the men in black took him or her ahh?



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
reply to post by Elsek
 


megneverlands Meg
RT @blcsfo LOOK AT HOW FOX NEWS REPORTED BIN LADEN DEATH j.mp/jDzGnI
1 May

The image is is dated too. (the link in the may 1st tweet j.mp... )

Nika Watts☀ | IamNikaWatts
This is the Fox pic I'm ranting about. Very inappropriate!!!
05/02/2011 via UberSocial


Ban the troll IMO..
lockerz.com...

Obviously the edited the tweet or knows of a way to change dates. How IDK...
edit on 7-5-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: (no reason given)


Or maybe he's telling the truth. You can't just hack tweet.com.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ex_CT2
Look at that. It says "OBAMA bin Laden"....


That is a typo...Fox had to put a quarter in the "accidently said obama instead of osama" jar...(I think I have tossed about $23 worth of quarters in the last 2 years. heh)...anyhow, thats off topic. the topic is the tweet timestamped at the 28th



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
reply to post by AntuA
 


Probably The Fox Report with Shepard Smith...but of course, this page only goes back to April 29.

www.foxnews.com...
edit on 5/7/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)


All her tweets surrounding that one were royal wedding and he was covering the royal wedding that night!
edit on 5/7/2011 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
reply to post by Laokin
 


Its not hosted on there own computer ... wtf are you taking about ...
IT WAS UPLOADED on the 2nd ... and it is in a May 1st tweet ,,
edit on 7-5-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: (no reason given)


Man, if you don't STFU. Are you inbred? It was posted on the 28th. In between her excited tweets about the royal wedding.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
Coms on guys, stop feeding these disinfo trolls, or whatever they are.....


+2 more 
posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
Instead of all the flim flam that this thread is becoming, for those not seeing what we are, can you please give a clear, concise, and on topic rebuttal of this?

Do not simply make fun of those who are interested in the topic. That is neither debunking or rebutting. It's simply acting immature.

I just want to get to the truth there. If there is a factual reason you believe the information in this thread is false, please explain it clearly so I can consider it and understand your arguments. I am not going to know why you do not believe this when all of your points boil down to 'This is stOOpid. You are a CT tard for believing this. haha.' etc.

If you disagree, clearly state why.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Castaway65
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


No need to debunk something that isn't there just the FACT that the OP is not responding is enough for any normal person,he or she is sitting back laughing at YOU and the rest of you..OO wait maybe the men in black took him or her ahh?



Debunk it...just debunk it. Matters not...the ops may have had a stroke, or went bowling...it doesn't matter at this point as the information is pointed out.

So...debunk it. Thats all you have to do. And until you do, you are acting like a child. Deny Ignorance
Unless the ops is also a very high level administrator at twitter, then they simply cannot change the timestamp (even then I am not sure).

So there it is...debunk it or remain quiet while the adults talk.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:29 PM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 

"Moron" and "troll" are kinda harsh aren't they? I assure you sir, I'm neither. OP may have thought they saw something on the ticker and was mistaken. Isn't that possible? Also not explained as pointed out by other ATSer's is....why was the OP allowed to start a thread on her/his first post? Maybe a mod can explain that?



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Castaway65
 


Mods if this isn't enough reason to ban someone I don't know what is, there is no way a human capable of connecting to the internet is this incredibly stupid. Can't believe I'm biting on this troll bait.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by AshleyD
Instead of all the flim flam that this thread is becoming, for those not seeing what we are, can you please give a clear, concise, and on topic rebuttal of this?

Do not simply make fun of those who are interested in the topic. That is neither debunking or rebutting. It's simply acting immature.

I just want to get to the truth there. If there is a factual reason you believe the information in this thread is false, please explain it clearly so I can consider it and understand your arguments. I am not going to know why you do not believe this when all of your points boil down to 'This is stOOpid. You are a CT tard for believing this. haha.' etc.

If you disagree, clearly state why.


I think rebuttals with no actual valid method of debunking and using just humiliation tactics should be considered off topic...perhaps some admining to get back on topic?



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:30 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:30 PM
link   
reply to post by AshleyD
 




Ashley they wont even be able to read your reply properly, let alone respond.
They can't even read the thread and see what's being discussed?



Grrrrrrr




posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
reply to post by Laokin
 


Its not hosted on there own computer ... wtf are you taking about ...
IT WAS UPLOADED on the 2nd ... and it is in a May 1st tweet ,,
edit on 7-5-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: (no reason given)


Link to the picture.

100% that it's either an avatar or it's a redirect....

My point was explaining how you could have a new picture posted on an old post. Sub out your own server, for any server you have admin access to, and blamo.... same result.

Images are usually hosted by Imagehosting sites like imageshack.us or photobucket....(A.F.A.I.K. Twitter does NOT host images) they then link back to the imagehost to display the image in any post. If I had access to my own imagehost (my own computer if I wanted it to be) all I would have to do is swap the files of the image... which isn't editing the actual post, but is replacing the image at the end where the link tells it to look.

I don't know of any more clear way to say it....

If you don't understand how filehosting works, you really aren't a credible source of information.

What I'm saying now in plain english is, you're wrong. If you wish to make a mockery of yourself, go ahead and post the link to the backdated image.

It will prove you don't understand what you're talking about.

Like.... Duh, Obviously....

(Smells like an agent of disinformation to me)
edit on 7-5-2011 by Laokin because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by blupblup
 

"Moron" and "troll" are kinda harsh aren't they? I assure you sir, I'm neither. OP may have thought they saw something on the ticker and was mistaken. Isn't that possible? Also not explained as pointed out by other ATSer's is....why was the OP allowed to start a thread on her/his first post? Maybe a mod can explain that?


How can the OP mistakenly see something. No one knew Osama was dead until May 1st. Its either true, or the OP can see into the future. Where would OP get the information to tweet about Osamas death 3 days prior?



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:32 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 





I think rebuttals with no actual valid method of debunking and using just humiliation tactics should be considered off topic...perhaps some admining to get back on topic?


Please hit alert on posts that are in violation (this is what I am doing as well). Staff is not allowed to moderate threads we participate in as members so we don't get accused of bias or targetting posts we disagree with. lol

Since I am participating as a member, I cannot action them. Just hit alert.



new topics

top topics



 
302
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join