It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Naked news arouses anger

page: 3
8
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Adyta
 



Yes, we are animals, but it doesn't mean we should "embrace" that fact and start acting like savages.
I;m not saying we should embrace the fact, I'm saying we shouldn't forget that fact.


If you saw a man walking down main street completely naked, which thought would pop into your head first? "Wow, look at him. What a free spirit, I admire that guy" or "WTF is wrong with him?".
I would probably think he was crazy and free...but the crazy part of my thoughts comes from conditioning through living in a society where we are so absolute about wearing clothes.


Besides, if we were all to walk around naked... where would we keep our wallets?
I'm not saying we should all just go around naked...I'm simply saying we should be allowed that choice.


edit on 7-5-2011 by BlahBleh because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 7 2011 @ 07:21 AM
link   
To combat this, Governments are planning on making it illegal for any mother to give birth to a naked baby.

Anyone caught violating this rule will have to deal with the authorities and the gnashing, howling mobs of the politically correct.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 07:50 AM
link   
reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
 


No. Its about feminist using young kids to make their point. Has not one thing to do with kids watching naked women read the news at all. The kids parents should be raising kane if this were an issue at all, instead we have a collection of feminists using this "issue" to gain a little attention.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 07:55 AM
link   
Naked News, of course, as opposed to the "adult content" that was normally on in that time-slot. What's "worse"? If you want to put it that way.

I live in South Africa, and a while back I was having a nice chilled night with my brother. Playing some game. Watching a dvd. And the next, we flick through the channels, and find a naked woman reading what they called news.
Slightly disconcerting, of course. But then again, as I said, this is in a time-slot that was quite famous for it's late-night movies. And having only four public channels does make one glaringly aware of all of this, so you can't really remain oblivious to it in any case.

Whether it brings up moral agenda's though, I don't think so. In an age where every child can easily use the internet on his phone to look at whatever he likes, having only to click on a button that confirms he's older than eighteen; this does not merit outrage. Surely, woman showing nothing more than their breasts, does not constitute wide-spread panic for our children's well-being. And cementing a chauvinistic belief that women are sex objects? Yes, maybe. But then what about Playboy, FHM, etc. Take your pick.

Maybe my take on it is a bit lackadaisical, but then I would question why you're letting your children watch television at midnight? And it's not just naked news by the way, but watch television too late in the evening with your parents, and you're plagued with cellphone adds that blatantly advertise pornography anyway.

My point, past all of this, is that severing the mere fingernail of the problem, won't solve it. If you have a problem, figure out a way to restructure our current society as a whole. I'll even join you on that one.
And if you don't have a problem, well, then you probably aren't reading much of this anyway...



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 08:09 AM
link   
At what piont between a baby having a breast in its mouth feeding and that same human turning 18, is it not okay to see a naked woman?

Its actually fine for kids to see sex related parts etc, just keep the baby making info under wraps till they understand.... we got this far right with these rules right?

my overall thoughts: It is YOUR OPINION of what is appropriate for your child, if you expose them to (or fail to prevent) anything YOU dont agree with, it is YOUR fault.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 08:12 AM
link   
reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
 
Forget the news part just bring on the strippers.

PS arouse anger
I thought it would arouse other things

edit on 7-5-2011 by acrux because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 08:28 AM
link   
reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
 





This is about young kids being exposed to nudity. Not about mature men watching the news for some fun.


Throw the kids from a bridge, problem solved.

Anyways, wtf is wrong with all those peoples saying constantly " oh my god think about the kids" is our society is centered around kids or what ?

If you dont want your kids to watch the naked news DO YOUR WORK AS PARENT and prevent your kids to watch thoses news !!!



On another subject, feminists can burn in (potential) hell

Notice how feminists want to establish more and more rules against their old enemies , mens ?
Feminists , or i should say feminazis...

The day men and womens decide to understand each others,that day the world gonna change a bit in a good way.






edit on 7-5-2011 by Conciliatore because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 09:37 AM
link   


the stereotype that women are sex objects

They are!!

Humans are not asexual as (most) Dandelions; sexual preferences targeting the opposite sex are pretty much plain natural!

For heterosexual men women are sex objects, just as for heterosexual women; men are....



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 11:32 AM
link   
People get all bent out of shape because someone has their clothes off.

If God wanted you to have clothes you would have been born in a nice pair of slacks and dress shirt.

This is a non issue that people are wasting their time on.

If it bothers you that much then don't watch.

Case closed.

Maybe their should be some hot naked guys on there to shut up the people complaining.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 11:43 AM
link   
If anyone remembers L!VETV in the uk they used to do this and other stuff like topless darts etc.

Was terrible thinking back at how crap the station was and some of the content they had on.. Though seemed great when we were younger


The trampoline midget weatherman



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   
I understand the simple logic of "everyone should be naked" from the hedonists, but I think it's terribly flawed. There is reason for society to frown on nudity.

First off, it's a sign of barbarism. We evolved to shape our immediate surroundings towards our benefit. I'm talking about clothing. It helps us to keep cool, or not be sun burned, or acts as a layer of shielding between objects and our body, etc..not wearing clothing would mean....something is off with you.

But that's not a good enough reason for shunning these people. I honestly think it comes down to eugenics and population control. If everyone was walking around naked, men would have boners 24/7 and be much more promiscuous. The more partners we have, the more weakened our species becomes from STD's. So it's a means of steering our species in the right direction.

People don't think deep enough about these things, and give up. They don't see reason in what used to be common sense. At one point, we learn the lesson the hard way, then forget over the generations, but keep with the "common sense" bit. Well, we become so off on so many things, that we lose our moral compass, and the common sense becomes eroded. So the social structure collapses, and the cycle repeats.
edit on 7-5-2011 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   
reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
 


Naked News is terrible! Those poor women always being treated as pieces of meat!

I'm sure glad men are never used in such a sexual fashion! Oh...:


What a load of bollocks!

Update re:

If everyone was walking around naked, men would have boners 24/7 and be much more promiscuous. The more partners we have, the more weakened our species becomes from STD's. So it's a means of steering our species in the right direction.


I disagree. Our taboo'ed treatment of sex and the human body is the reason it's such an arousing thing. If it were commonplace and treated as normal and health, like at nudist colonies, it would effectively become boring and a non-issue. Studies mentioned on Mysterious Universe (sorry I don't have them handy at the moment) have shown that nudist teens are typically better adjusted as well as more comfortable with their own bodies. Our prudishness yields a 'forbidden fruit' aspect.

You also have to consider that most people, sadly, are not actually all that attractive naked. When's the last time you ever heard of rampant orgies or sexual breakouts at nudist colonies? How about those 'brutish' natives that tend to go mostly naked? To me, it seems as though they live both more in touch with the world itself, as well as less paranoid about the human body than we do.

Score for them.
edit on 5/7/2011 by Praetorius because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by unityemissions
 





If everyone was walking around naked, men would have boners 24/7 and be much more promiscuous.


I dont think so. If everyone was walking around naked, then naked body would not be so strongly associated with sexuality, and people would maybe look beyond superficial body attributes for attraction. Just look at nudist communities, or those tribes where being naked is the norm.




They don't see reason in what used to be common sense. At one point, we learn the lesson the hard way, then forget over the generations, but keep with the "common sense" bit.


Blacks being subhuman or homosexuals being imprisoned also used to be common sense. Contrary to popular beliefs, past generations were more stupid, naive and brainwashed than we are. If there is no more reason for something other than tradition or "common sense", then it is probably BS vestigial from the darker past.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
I like it as long as the woman isnt a dog....who wants to watch Janet Reno or that Naplitano creature do the news nude?
edit on 5/7/2011 by Homedawg because: sp



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Adyta
Typical feminist crap. If women were so insulted about being so called "sex objects", then they wouldn't be doing what they do. Women willingly put themselves in these situation, and are being paid for it.

Nobody is forcing women to report the news naked, or have sex on film, or wear revealing clothing at Hooters, etc. If a woman doesn't want to be looked at as a sex object, then it's their job as an INDIVIDUAL to not behave like one.

It's not just women that report the news for this program naked. Men do as well. Men also have sex on film, model in revealing clothing, etc. We aren't looked at as sex objects.

This is a blatant double standard, and the reason nobody will take feminists seriously. Ever.


Just because some people are WILLING to do something does not make that a good thing for society.
If people would use their brains they would realize there are some things that build a strong society that moves it up and somethings that drag it down until it goes the way of the Roman Empire.
Only the ignorant will not understand that the road we make our main highway effects the path of us all.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
Most of you seem to be missing the point guys.

This is about young kids being exposed to nudity. Not about mature men watching the news for some fun.

VVV


Parents, watch your children and dont let them watch shows you think are bad for them.

The end.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   
When are we going to start taking responsibility for the things we expose not only our children's minds to. Not just the children but our adult minds as well?

The women are doing it because they are getting paid to do it and the men perpetuate it because they are the ones supporting the behavior. Both sides are responsible and its pointing fingers is ridiculous.

EVERYTHING we watch and listen to on TV, or the radio etc is effecting how we learn and how we are teaching our children to learn.

SEX is good but it should be a private ordeal and not flashed in front of individuals who are to lame to go out and get their own......NUFF SAID!



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   
I've got an idea........Shut off the T.V. and go outside. Do some yard work, mow the grass, tend to the garden, play fetch with the dogs............nude


As hung up as people are about nudity, it's a wonder that they even procreate at all.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by unityemissions
 





If everyone was walking around naked, men would have boners 24/7 and be much more promiscuous.


I dont think so. If everyone was walking around naked, then naked body would not be so strongly associated with sexuality, and people would maybe look beyond superficial body attributes for attraction. Just look at nudist communities, or those tribes where being naked is the norm.


And how long would this conditioning take? And how much damage would be done in the process.




Originally posted by Maslo


They don't see reason in what used to be common sense. At one point, we learn the lesson the hard way, then forget over the generations, but keep with the "common sense" bit.


Blacks being subhuman or homosexuals being imprisoned also used to be common sense. Contrary to popular beliefs, past generations were more stupid, naive and brainwashed than we are. If there is no more reason for something other than tradition or "common sense", then it is probably BS vestigial from the darker past.


Just because you don't see the reason behind a tradition, doesn't mean it's not there. The thought that mass public nudity wouldn't harm humanity seems to stem from not so good reasoning.



posted on May, 7 2011 @ 03:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
Most of you seem to be missing the point guys.

This is about young kids being exposed to nudity. Not about mature men watching the news for some fun.

VVV


"And there they were. Naked as God had created them. It must be the Devil's work."

Naked News is just about the nicest way any young person could be looking at a naked female. Nothing sexual is going on. It is only the pleasing view of a naked female body.

Should we ban the classical paintings that show nudity? Should we ban the great sculptures that show nudity?
Of course not.
What we should ban is the fear of nudity.

Sexual exploitation like we see on car shows, tractor pulling, boxing, Lingerie football etc. should be banned.
And we should do the same with the BEEP on TV when somebody swears. We all know what they say (including the kids) and we should ban excessive swearing rather than swearing itself.

The Naked News women are not exploited. They look good (well - one or two of them do).

And for those who feel women are exploited against their will:
When a woman has spent a long time in front of the mirror fixing her looks. When she has put on a low cut shirt. When she wears revealing clothing. She knows exactly what she looks like. And it would be an insult not to savour the sight.




top topics



 
8
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join