Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
So, from this, we are to assume that the neighbor had access to the inside of the compound and had conducted a thorough search of the entire premises
for no apparent reason....just so we are clear, are we supposed to believe this?
No we're not supposed to believe this. We're supposed to believe any preposterous claim which is put forth by the Government and their media mouth
pieces without providing any supporting evidence to back it up. Get with the program already!edit on 7-5-2011 by SphinxMontreal because: (no
reason given)
More importantly NOT ignore relevant eyewitness objective testimony and becoming polarized by ignorance of even allowing entrance as an exhibit to
objective testimony of an investigation unless it's a commoner who just stole some bread to feed his kids then it's relevant. Or if his testimony is
biased correct then it is entered and accepted as.
Why did you ever bail out those wanker bankers........? because no objective testimony of the wanker bankers has been allowed since 1913.
edit
on 7-5-2011 by Opspeculate because: spelling.......
This guy had an objection.....
Executive Order 1110 gave the US the ability to create its own money backed by silver. ...
www.john-f-kennedy.net...
www.rense.com...
Turned out not so good for JFK....
That the Executive Order was never repealed by any U.S. President through an Executive Order and is still valid. Why then has no president utilized
it? Virtually all of the nearly $6 trillion in debt has been created since 1963, and if a U.S. president had utilized Executive Order 11110 the debt
would be nowhere near the current level.
Because it's just not allowed....
edit on 7-5-2011 by Opspeculate because: (no reason given)