It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Media Scrambles as Bin Laden Story Crumbles

page: 9
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in


posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:04 PM
Just a personal theory;

Pakistani and American 'authorities' had known BL's whereabouts for years. They also knew he had surgery in SA and bought dialysis machines.

BL died of renal failure and the 'authorities' were notified. Cue the 'operatives' living next door to swing into 'action'.

The body was, reportedly, dumped at sea to avoid post mortem exam that would have revealed the true cause of death.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:04 PM
they needed 9/11 to set up the patriot act and seize oil in afghanistan and to keep the mighty gears of war turning their trillion dollar defence budget. now they are socially programming you for the next false flag attack with confusion and fear. we will be moving into a police state again soon as they continue to bombard you with a controlled media. Im starting to lean towards the school of thought that he actually did die back in 2001 as military insiders are saying on prison planet. and activist post and numerous you tube posts. And the fact taht obama is getting whiplash seems like a planned or predicted event according to the illuminati's card game. it shows a black president having food thrown at him while standing behind a podium and another card called teflon coating that uses the media to counter the whiplash card. there is a seperate thread on this subject but I thought it worth mentioning here. most likely the media will slowly leak out targets discovered on osama's harddrive creating fear milking it for all its worth before executing the next big one.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:07 PM

Originally posted by IAMDOA
Interesting thing to note is: The gentleman in the Video who claims to live next door and takes walks by the compound daily said that you can't even get in that area without showing your ID and answer questions as to why you are in that area?

They flew a silent chopper there, bypassing any would-be security checkpoints.


posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:09 PM
I’m afraid that when the US Air Force misplaced their Minot-to-Barksdale Nukes (that shows that their nuke accounting system is getting sloppy on purpose) to build up a hidden off-the-books stock-pile of nukes that will someday be detonated on the 111th floor of Larry Silverstein Sears Tower for a devastating false-flag Nuclear Air Burst. Blame it on a North Korea to Alcaida connection. Man business is really gonna be picking up in MIC and security. Someday, I think we’ll get it up to a million gumint workers with TopSecret clearances.

Hows that for paranoia? This SH*T is really getting into my head too. We have a changed national psyche since 9/11.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:09 PM
I was in a coma for a few yrs...but I swear to god in 2001 wasn't Bin Laden on dialysis and about to kick the bucket?

And didn't the Taliban offer him to the US in 2001? I just looked it up and yep, they did. So why didn't the US take him back then? W-T-F happened? LOL

edit on 7-5-2011 by TheLegend because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:13 PM
Let's go over the evidence. The video where he was watching himself on TV....that was the last time I saw him alive. I have seen no other evidence suggesting any different.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:29 PM
the think that flouridating our water, gmo foods, chemtrails/ the dumbing down of education will keep our memory spans limited to a 4-5 year span. apparently it takes a guy who in a coma some years to be able to remember. now isnt that interesting?!

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:30 PM

Originally posted by Aeons
I believe that they killed him.

However, there are problems in the "official" story. Here is a good one, so simple. Go to the wiki on Bin Laden. His death is listed as May 2.

They announced it May 2. Did it HAPPEN May 2?

I will tell you what's wrong with the official story. The WH is hiding the fact that POTUS was really not into this mission, but he needed the poll numbers. A WH insider apparently has leaked some info and it turns out that Leon Panetta was mostly in charge of the mission. The WH is trying to do damage control. I don't care much for Hillary, but she was for the mission apparently and Valerie Jarrett was talking the Prez out of it. It ties in perfectly with Glenn Beck's expose on Jarrett.

Check out this statement on Atlasshrugs

As Obama continues to politicize and mine the takedown of Osama Bin Laden and the outrageous "Islamic burial" that followed, new details emerge of his reluctance and refusal to sign off on the mission. It is the height of hypocrisy and crass opportunism to draw out the release of the death photos so as to prolong the news cycle on the story, and to neglect the tornado-ravaged parts of the country -- instead, Obama campaigns at Ground Zero on Thursday for an "O-victory lap," while it appears that in fact Obama had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the OBL operation.

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts

source: html

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:37 PM
when big brother makes plans apparently they are so elaborate they label them as 50 year plan or even 100 year plans. look at nasa they have had plans and projects than span 100 years. its no surprise how stupid we are compared to the powers that be, when we can only remember a few years back. I really like the coma post in this thread to illustrate my point. the only dude on ats who remembers the osama incident in 2001 because he was sleeping a few years and his brain was still fresh thinking he was waking up in 2001. this is solid proof how amnesia seems to control our lifes and how the government uses our stupidity against us. we are like insects to them! expendable containers as on elite called us.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 05:44 PM

Originally posted by hawaii50th

Originally posted by Watts
I just wanna know why there wasn't this same fervor with Bush's Iraq war and the blatant lies. That whole country is wrecked for the forsee-able future and everyones fine with it.

Maybe because with what Bush had done and failed to do, peoples hopes were high when Obama entered the stage. Then as big as Obama was on the stage he ended up acting just like the old boss, and disappointed everyone with false hopes.
So, what we end up with is disillusionment and less faith than the little we already had in government. Now everything the government does is a conspiracy.
Time for huge change, but what kind of change is the million dollar question? Maybe I should have said trillion dollar, million is so outdated these days.

Makes sense... kinda like "Oh HELL no! Not this BS again!!" eh?

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:03 PM
reply to post by burntheships


posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:12 PM
So something like this might apply.

While a good lie always has a string of truth running thru it. A better lie would be obscured by that string of truth.
So that even if the lie was dicovered ? Just trying to communicate the fact would make you look like your nuts.

edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:15 PM
They want you to be confused. They want everyone in the world to have a different story of the accounts. Why? It is because they want you to forget about the greater truth that this is all nothing but a pack of lies and instead argue amongst one another which specific lies might be true and which ones might be lies. They want you to think that it was the news itself and the bureaucrats that misinformed the public and not the government itself. They want you to get side tracked with this story or that instead of being able to stay focused on the greater whole that they are all a pack of lies.

They only truth so far that can be proven is that they have given no proof whatsoever that Osama Bin Laden was ever even there and that the government refuses to provide any actual facts to prove it.

You are being lied to about the largest cover-up in American History by your own government. The only other conclusion would be that no one in the media or government is competent in their jobs, not even the Navy Seals. Cover-up, or absolute incompetence? Of course it is a cover-up and your government is doing nothing but lie to you so that you will never discover the actual truth.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:16 PM
Ya, might as well toss this one out there again.

I captured a Bigfoot the other day but I had to drop him in the ocean. Don't believe me ? Tuff sht.

Also we need to ask ourselves what is the alternative to these lies ? Why do they bother with fabricating all this stuff? I can't believe a week ago I thought I understood a big part of the picture..

edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-5-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:29 PM
I believe, and I may be totally off base here, that the death of OBL will be the final impetus for invading Iran. Obama's White House will say "of all the information garnered out of the computers and hard drives confiscated from OBL's compound, we have discovered, MUCH TO OUR HORROR, that OBL was closely planning with IRAN an even bigger attack on the USofA with NUKES built and supplied by that nemisis of Israel and OURS: IRAN!!!
This may be the smokescreen that has been put up preliminarily for the invasion of Iran. TPTB have been beating the Iran war drums for months if not years and this may be the contrived catalyst needed. And, the sheeple will fall for it lock, stock and barrel.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:33 PM
BBC Now Admits Al Qaeda Never Existed

') ('

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:34 PM
I like your pose very much.
I think he may be alive.
so they can question him.

have you notices that a big pop star
when they die, they become s big thing.
They could not let Ombama just die a sick old man.
he had to be a martyr.

they could have kept it a secret they way they killed him.
but they let it get out.
they could have easily keep it a secret.

some thing is not right with all of the things like this on the news?
Them! are not ammeters. so why do they keep messing it up?
are they doing it on purpose?
its like this are trying to keep us occupied.
about 4 layers of deception. or more.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 06:59 PM
One thing I have noticed about this particular story is there is a lot of hearsay. Every day, whether it's solicited or not, I am told some new fact or piece of the story. It seems like the facts are so vague that the story is turning into a composite rouse/urban legend. The facts are so scattered and non-existent that I don't know what is real and what isn't. I kind of don't care but it is unsettling when the powers that be try to pass some bull$h!t right in front of you. Personally, I believe he has been dead for some time.... just sayin'

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 07:02 PM
reply to post by NightFlight

That seems like a worst case scenario. I don't feel that the "terrorists" had as much at their disposal as everybody imagines.

posted on May, 7 2011 @ 07:10 PM
i didnt see this thread before i started this one asking the same thing!!

I challenge YOU!!!

i m gonna go through this thread for fresh ideas..

edit on 7-5-2011 by heineken because: (no reason given)

top topics

<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in