It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deltaboy
reply to post by PsykoOps
Why would the CIA talked about their so called failed mission? You believed that?
A suspected CIA drone strike targeted a militant stronghold area in the North Waziristan region of Pakistan’s borderlands yesterday, killing 15 people, according to news reports.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Jakes51
I think it's time to revive the "Great Game thread"
The pieces have been moved
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by tristar
They knew OBL was in the compound because they had the CIA spying on the building not because of drones.
Except that the cia op was a failure. They didn't know he was in there. Which would explain the op instead of just droning the place or sniping him.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Jakes51
I think it's time to revive the "Great Game thread"
The pieces have been moved
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by tristar
Please don’t patronise me I know what surveillance teams do and don’t do. The simple fact is there is no way that the Americans would have tipped of Pakistan about this operation, you seem to be struggling to accept that. For the rescord however it is possible SAD where involved in the raid
Originally posted by tristar
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by tristar
They knew OBL was in the compound because they had the CIA spying on the building not because of drones.
Except that the cia op was a failure. They didn't know he was in there. Which would explain the op instead of just droning the place or sniping him.
I doubt it was a failure for obvious reasons. Before you go on, surveillance teams do not engage targets, they are there only for surveillance, units that engage do not do surveillance, two different units for two different purposes.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by tristar
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by tristar
They knew OBL was in the compound because they had the CIA spying on the building not because of drones.
Except that the cia op was a failure. They didn't know he was in there. Which would explain the op instead of just droning the place or sniping him.
I doubt it was a failure for obvious reasons. Before you go on, surveillance teams do not engage targets, they are there only for surveillance, units that engage do not do surveillance, two different units for two different purposes.
I know what the difference is. My personal belief is that they failed in the op to ID him before taking action. Wikileaks revealed that his personal courier was compromised. That forced the issue and they had to go in without being sure if he was there. That's why they went in with a team instead of using a sniper or a drone.