Do you think the picture on the American Dollar bill is related to geometrical optics theorized by such theorist as Plato, Aristotle, Euclid and
Ptolemy? That we transmit ocular beams or visual eyes through our eyes, to touch distant object, that radiate in cone shapes. This is how we can feel
when someone’s 'eyes are on us'. The symbol is related to 'extramission'?
Maybe the image is also about opening up the third eye and has multiple meanings?
I'm in University and two of my classes this Summer are 'The Meaning of Life' and 'Understanding Colour'. In 'The Meaning of Life' classes I'm
learning a lot about ancient philosophes and 'Understanding Colour' is a class related to the Science of how we see colour.
I will write more about explaining geometrical optics, extramission and ancient theories later; for those who don't know them already. Right now I
have a headache; I guess this question is for those who already know these theories. Can you see a connection like I can? I found the connection
through both of these classes teachings and pieced them both together.
edit on 6-5-2011 by inanna1234 because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-5-2011 by inanna1234 because: Added Picture
I posted a link to the picture. Notice how around the eye (top triangle part) light is being emmitted from it? Platos theories are about light being
transmitted from our eyes us in cone shapes... and that is how we can see
edit on 6-5-2011 by inanna1234 because: (no reason given)
Of course they are related, they work the symbols as they have always have, to the rest of the uninitiated everything looks like a mess, nothing is
connected, we are alone, but once from the depth we have risen and through the mud traveled, a symbol appears as much more than it is, our connection
gets cleaned and one can begin to fathom some of the mysteries, and believe me there are plenty!
here some links with load of info for your journey!
everything is related, there are tons more, later we can begin the connections, but you need to know what we are talking about in a broader sense than
what can possibly taught in school
dont believe in anything you read! doubt your ears, question your eyes!
Thanks so much for the links! I will look at them soon, I love learning! There are a few other symbols that I have seen that I've made connections
to. One of the symbols is extremely ancient and very rarely talked about. The few times I've heard mention of it on T.V. they always explain it as
something different (and very far out there) but to me it's as clear as the geometric sign on the bill. I will message you after I view the links and
see if you also see the connection I've made
I guess this question is for those who already know these theories. Can you see a connection like I can?
Yes, so what. I challenge you to build an applied use for the theory of extramission. I know of one, and the guy was is a genius.
And everyone here has seen the results of his work. He became very rich. And his work completely overturned all of Renaissance science and classical
mechanics. But even he hasn't realized it yet. Neither has anyone else. Except me.
Why do I spout so much ego?
Well... we are talking about extramission aren't we.
Plato held that the reason a Greek can see a hammer is that the hammer itself is throwing off hundreds of tiny little hammer pictures, and that one of
those tiny hammer pictures strikes the eye of said Greek, allowing them to see it. So I'm throwing off bunches of tiny little ego statements in the
first paragraph. But I ask you, has it helped anyone see what the answer is? No it hasn't.
Plato's theory, while close, suffers from the same fundamental flaw. For it to work every object would have to have it's own ego, it's own self
image, so that it could throw them into the eye of observers. And any object could become invisible merely by wishing not to be seen and humbling
Further, what is suggested in the opening post is that the occultic imagery on the dollar bill; in a very literal sense is casting the all seeing eye
and pyramid into the doorway of our souls every time we look at it. The implications of this, if believed by the ultra elite; are that they would
never want to handle or see money themselves, and that it was designed to be handled and seen by the lower classes. Namely everyone but them.
On those grounds, yes. It's possible that some small cadre of ultra elite manipulators through history have both believed in and continue to use
extramission. But the genius I hinted too did something entirely different. His model doesn't require that every object in visible existence has an
ego, a self image, nor does it require them to all continually agree to not become invisible. Ever, not even once, in the history of all creation.
Originally posted by TheOneEyedProphet
of course inanna1234wants to know more, after all we all got here for a reason!
The standard model of light and vision on the surface of the earth is that the sun produces light, that light strikes a hammer, it bounces off at an
angle, and then strikes the eye of the observer. So we have light source, object, and observer. This model reduces the number of ego's required
from three (one for each party) to one. For the observer to be able to comprehend what they are seeing in comparison to themselves.
Lets look at the history of simulating this on a computer. It's called ray tracing. A light source has to put out thousands upon thousands of light
rays. All of which go off in slightly different directions. Bounce around a bunch of times striking various objects and having it's color changed
by absorption/refraction and the few, very few, rays that strike the camera lens generate the image.
The image generated by ray tracing has these automatic advantages built into over other, faster, rendering models like the painters algorithm, z-sort,
and such. It automatically does hidden surface removal, generation of shadows, and reflections. The problem with ray tracing is how computationally
intensive it is and how many rays of light are "wasted."
In this video the ray tracing is done by mainframe computers that took minutes or hours to generate each frame of which at least 25 were
required for each second of image. The original movie Tron required a room full of main frames working about 2 hours to generate a single second of
In fact it was so intensive, and computers so slow, that in 1990 prominent computer scientists went on record saying that "real time 3D rendering on
a desktop PC is not possible." Well a couple of young kids in Shreveport Louisiana didn't know it wasn't possible and did it anyway. They
released a game called Wolfenstein 3D in 1992. These days no one doubts that real time 3D rendering can be done on a computer, even a tiny desk top.
Hell even on a hand held.
But there is a big difference between most 3D these days, which is based on z-sort, and the John Carmac engine which is actual ray tracing. This is
why games like World of Warcraft lag, and have rendering artifacts, but games like Doom 3 have no artifacts, real time dynamic lighting, and
blindingly fast render times.
Even the big brains in the computer graphics world haven't fully grasped what Carmac did. At least not yet. Most graphics card companies have gone
the route of parallel processors and just stacked lots and lots of math coprocessors on their cards to do all the division problems of the z-sort
algorithm. Nvidia, when approached by Carmac, rejected his requests for chip support of his engine and went with the z-sort model. Fools, all of
them. The x-box works cause there are more processors in there than were in all of NASA for the first 20 years of its existance. It's a brute force
Yes, I'd love to know more. Everything your writing is very interesting
So what did Carmac really do.
He flipped the model. Instead of light going from the sun, to the hammer, to the eye; he traced the ray from the eye to the hammer. This reduced the
number of rays from near infinite to just one for each pixel wide the screen was. About 320 at the time. Even better, once the ray struck an object,
like a wall or hammer, the ray tracing stopped, and what ever color found was drawn to the screen buffer.
This allowed for real time 3D rendering that did hidden surface removal automatically, and had startling realism to where even a photo on a wall was
automatically tilted and scaled correctly.
A level of detail that had never been even approached prior to this. I would also like to note that none of the computer scientists who said this
was never going to be possible issued any retractions. I guess they made their egos smaller and disappeared in true Platonic fashion.
All Carmac has to do to add reflections is allow the ray to continue a few more bounces and then test if the ray is aimed at the light source. If it
is the final color is rendered to the screen buffer, if it isn't the first color found is rendered instead.
The most startling thing about this, and to sum it all up in one sentence. The hint all this contains about the fundamental nature of reality, that
no scientists that I'm aware of have begun to study. And how this all relates to what Plato said about extramission is as follows. It even touches
on what Heisenberg himself said.
Light may actually start from the observer.
A candle or a sun, may actually be a collection point for the rays generated by all observers. In this sense the ultra elite using their mind tricks
in their symbols and subliminals are actually attracting all those negative consequences to themselves. They just haven't reached a high enough
level of understanding to realize it yet. I almost feel sorry for them.
If light starts from the observor do you think we could all possible be light?
If the elite that you talk about are bad... and that the symbol they use actual reflects negativity back towards them... do you think the symbols were
originally used by other people to reflect negativity back at them? Or dd the elite themselve place symbols everywhere unknowingly reflecting
negativity back towards themselves?
If the elite that you talk about are bad... and that the symbol they use actual reflects negativity back towards them... do you think the
symbols were originally used by other people to reflect negativity back at them? Or dd the elite themselve place symbols everywhere unknowingly
reflecting negativity back towards themselves?
I think they are like someone who is playing with technology they didn't create and don't fully understand. The reason I imply they are bad is that
history shows that they tend to take their frustrations out on the common people when ever these symbols and their use don't get the results they
expected or desire. On top of that, for some reason, they believe that the best results are gained when the people are more ignorant, and less
informed than they are. Hence the reason for so many secrets.
Professor Feynman tells an interesting story on just this point in his book
"Surely you're joking Mr. Feynman" where he talks about heading up the Manhattan Project and inventing The Bomb. The calculations required were
massive. The army had given them an old style punch card main frame, very modern for the time, with three army techs to operate it. Each calculation
had to be hand punched into the cards, the cards stacked in the exact right order, then manually loaded into the machine to run.
Well these hard charging American Army techs were demoralized. There was a war going on, and here they were in a room under tight security punching
meaningless little holes into meaningless little pieces of paper. They had no idea what the project was all about.
Mr. Feynman went to the General and said, look I have _got_ to tell these guys what they are working on. This is taking too long. We will never get
done with the calculations being completed at this rate. After wrangling for a while, the General finally gave in and upped the techs clearance.
Mr. Feynman told them about The Bomb.
The next day the Techs had figured out how to run three calculations simultaneously by alternating sub batches as they were punching or feeding, or
taking read outs. The project was finished ahead of schedule, and America won the war.
The one sentence way I say it these days is ...
People are exactly as smart as you treat them.
edit on 6-5-2011 by davidgrouchy because: (no reason given)
Well I think everyone on this planet is ignorant in someway...There isn't anyone who knows everything
For some reason I don't think a lot of these symbols are "occult" maybe these symbols got a bad name from Christians??? And maybe certain things
have been kept "secret" from fear of others... look what happened to Socrates, he was killed... think back to when Europe was colonised into
Christians... If you didn't adapt to their ideals, you were murdered and called a witch
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.