Al Qaeda Confirms Osama Bin Laden's Death!

reply to post by Chadwickus


I'd just like to say that there is, or was a website and not just a chat room

news.bbc.co.uk...

The most recent, posted on a website known to be used by Islamist militants, strongly criticised the US and coalition forces in Iraq and ordered a jihad, or holy war, against them.

So there you have it, the terrorists do have a website but the link is not given. This news article is from 2004, meaning they've been carrying on with this fake al qaeda website without providing a link for 7 years.

You see, they are now doing it over "message boards" because the website myth is falling apart.

Oh, so a random message board confirms this, and you take that at face value? How many times have we hard "oh it's just a youtube video" or "it's just a blog" but now that the msm says it it has to be true, yeah right!

No link = no proof.

reply to post by filosophia


I wouldn’t be so quick to call it a hoax. If this has came from website that encourage violence I can understand who media outlets would argue that they have a corporate responsibility to not post a direct link.

Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by wcitizen

 

I have done, and I have reached the conclusion that any connection between Al’Qa’ida and the CIA during the 1980’s was negligible and from the 1990’s onwards there was no connection what so ever.

not true !!!

the CIA visited Bin Laden in the hospital
in Dubai, the same week of 9/11.
That was as late as 2001.

That was from my first link I posted in
an earlier post.

Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by filosophia

 

I wouldn’t be so quick to call it a hoax. If this has came from website that encourage violence I can understand who media outlets would argue that they have a corporate responsibility to not post a direct link.

For 7 years they "protected the public" by shielding the website give me a break, look if they didn't want Americans to think about al qaeda they wouldn't be plasting Bin Laden's face on the t.v. and they wouldn't be talking about al qaeda website and chat rooms. This is a hoax, I have no doubt about that.

There are plenty more violence websites out there than al qaeda, like for instance websites that show pictures of war, or how about the death cult porn websites, oh right let's not get rid of that just al CIA da.

reply to post by filosophia

Find me a link to this suppose website or internet message where they confirmed bin laden's death otherwise this is no proof of confirmation.

Why don't you just look for the link yourself?

Then once you find it you can make a thread on how government law enforcements are investigating you.

You can start with this Google Translator

I suggest Arabic

Osama Bin Laden is not dead, there's no body, pictures, or the prized AK-47. It's all Hollywood CIA drama getting everyone ready for the next invasion of a another foreign country, that's all.

Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by filosophia

 

Find me a link to this suppose website or internet message where they confirmed bin laden's death otherwise this is no proof of confirmation.

Why don't you just look for the link yourself?

Then once you find it you can make a thread on how government law enforcements are investigating you.

You can start with this Google Translator

I suggest Arabic

No point looking because it doesn't exist. I did start a thread about this but it was closed down because it was too similar to this thread even though I explained why it wasn't. So you're stuck with me now. In a way I can see how it is right to do this in this thread and not its own: a claim was made that al qaeda confirmed Bin Laden's death "in a chat room" but no link to the chat room thus this is not a trustworthy confirmation.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
What there is though, are forums and chat rooms that members of Al Qaeda visit.

and that would be exactly like 4chan
where anybody can log in and claim
to be whomever they want. Does not
confirm the poster(s) was Al Queda.
That could have been a CIA Agent
posing as Al Queda. So, still not
confirmed

Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Chadwickus

 

I'd just like to say that there is, or was a website and not just a chat room

news.bbc.co.uk...

The most recent, posted on a website known to be used by Islamist militants, strongly criticised the US and coalition forces in Iraq and ordered a jihad, or holy war, against them.

So there you have it, the terrorists do have a website but the link is not given. This news article is from 2004, meaning they've been carrying on with this fake al qaeda website without providing a link for 7 years.

You see, they are now doing it over "message boards" because the website myth is falling apart.

Oh, so a random message board confirms this, and you take that at face value? How many times have we hard "oh it's just a youtube video" or "it's just a blog" but now that the msm says it it has to be true, yeah right!

No link = no proof.

I totally agree, filosophia. It's amazing how some debunkers and skeptics at ATS demand proof for extraordinary claims in the form of links to REAL websites and poo-poo mere allegations and hearsay evidence, yet are quite happy to accept similar flimsy evidence in the forms of unsubstantiated claims by newspapers and TV channels.

Hypocrisy at its finest!

reply to post by filosophia


A forum is a website....

Here's one place I've found that's said to be used, it called Shumukh al-Islam forum.

reply to post by boondock-saint


This is the problem you all believe what you want to believe. Go read the accounts form the CIA guys who were first in during the Afghan conflict, they had no contact with OBL its just a myth created by conspiracy theorists to fit in with their 9/11 theories. In December 2001 Dalton Fury (Delta Force commander) was listening to OBL over a radio then he either went further into Afghanistan or most likely into Pakistan. How did he also manage to be in Dubai at the same time to get some Kidney Dialysis and a visit form the CIA

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by filosophia

 

A forum is a website....

Here's one place I've found that's said to be used, it called Shumukh al-Islam forum.

once again, that is not a link. I typed it into google and got this

www.jihadica.com...

Nothing about the confirmation there.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
Al Jazeera are posting this information too, and they're known for reporting Al Qaeda/Osama stories and messages.

Al-Jazeera is ALSO funded by the George Soros
propaganda machine.

Can we get some sources in here NOT
tied to a media run by Soros propaganda ???
thanks

reply to post by kevinunknown


Wrong, al Qaeda is not a myth created by conspiracy theorists, al Qaeda is a myth created by Zibigniew Brezinski

www.youtube.com...

Yes, go on and say "but that's just a youtube link"

Well at least it's A link to something, as oppose to a link to NOTHING.

reply to post by filosophia


I think the point is that these websites are used to recruit terrorists, its not exactly ethical for a journalist to tell us about these sites just like details of a head of states security. So I can understand why they are not giving out the link, but I think we could find it if we have a look

reply to post by filosophia


Sorry but there is no way I will change my educated views on Al’Qa’ida based on a one minute long video. It is an insult to my intelligence to assume I would

Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

This is the problem you all believe what you want to believe. Go read the accounts form the CIA guys who were first in during the Afghan conflict, they had no contact with OBL its just a myth created by conspiracy theorists to fit in with their 9/11 theories. In December 2001 Dalton Fury (Delta Force commander) was listening to OBL over a radio then he either went further into Afghanistan or most likely into Pakistan. How did he also manage to be in Dubai at the same time to get some Kidney Dialysis and a visit form the CIA

link please ???

no link - no evidence
it's hear-say

Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by filosophia

 

its not exactly ethical for a journalist to tell us about these sites

Well I got news for you, they just did tell us about it, by saying a confirmation came from these websites.

So, it's not ethical for a journalist to give a link to a source for their audience, but it is ethical for a journalist to tell their audience about what they found on their "secret" link.

So, I read a book by a scientist saying the world will end tomorrow. Don't believe me? You must be a conspiracy theorist. You want the link? Sorry, it has sensitive information on it, and you can't see it

Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by filosophia

 

Sorry but there is no way I will change my educated views on Al’Qa’ida based on a one minute long video. It is an insult to my intelligence to assume I would

at least it's a minute long compared to NO MINUTES LONG

So, where is your one minute long video showing al qaeda confirming OBL's death?

reply to post by boondock-saint


Sorry? Where did I say it was confirmed?

Is AFP part of your boogey man Soros conglomerate too?

They're reporting a telephone interview they had with a member of the Yemen branch of Al Qaeda, who they claim have confirmed his death.