It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
.....Conspiracy theorists are patriots, and wouldn't be necessary if the mainstream media did their jobs instead of taking dictation and passing it off as "news and analysis."
I am a "conspiracy theorist" -- and proud of it.
THE TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY FROM OUT OF THEIR OWN MOUTHS
“We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalize them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood.”
Carl R. Rogers, former president of the American Psychological Association
“Through strong, painful impressions we capture the patient’s attention, accustom him to unconditional obedience, and indelibly imprint in his heart the feeling of necessity. The will of his superior must be such a firm, immutable law for him that he will no more resist it than he would rebel against the elements.”
Johan Christian Reil (who first coined the word psychiatry) 1810.
“We must aim to make [psychiatry] permeate every educational activity in our national life… We have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the church; the two most difficult are law and medicine.”
John Rawlings Rees, a British psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation for Mental Health, when defining psychiatry’s goals 1940
The family is one of the major obstacles to improved mental health, and hence should be weakened, if possible, so as to free individuals and especially children from the coercion of family life.”
One of the entrenched “policies” of psychiatry from the International Congress on Mental Health, London 1948. clareswinney.wordpress.com...-456
...The Rockefeller family sponsored research and donated sums to universities and medical schools which had drug based research. They further extended this policy to foreign universities and medical schools where research was drug based through their "International Education Board". Establishments and research which were were not drug based were refused funding and soon dissolved in favor of the lucrative pharmaceutical industry.
In 1939 a "Drug Trust" alliance was formed by the Rockefeller empire and the German chemical company IG Farben (Bayer). After World War Two, IG Farben was dismantled but later emerged as separate corporations within the alliance. Well known companies included General Mills, Kellogg, Nestle, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Procter and Gamble, Roche and Hoechst (Sanofi-Aventis). The Rockefeller empire, in tandem with Chase Manhattan Bank (now JP Morgan Chase), owns over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the United States.
It is the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world. Since WWII, the pharmaceutical industry has steadily netted increasing profits to become the world's second largest manufacturing industry; [3], [4] after the arms industry....
Auschwitz was the largest mass extermination factory in human history. However, few people are aware that Auschwitz was a 100% subsidiary of IG Farben. On April 14, 1941, in Ludwigshafen, Otto Armbrust, the IG Farben board member responsible for the Auschwitz project, stated to board colleagues:
"our new friendship with the SS is a blessing. We have determined all measures integrating the concentration camps to benefit our company."
Thousands of prisoners died during human experiments, drug and vaccine testing....
After WWII, IG Farben attempted to shake its abominable image through corporate restructuring and renaming. So great has been their success that the public has no idea that it many of the men responsible for such atrocities, were able to carry on their work even after the collapse of the Nazi regime. Namely, a medical paradigm that relies almost exclusively highly toxic drugs. Such men were in control of the large chemical and pharmaceutical companies, both well before and after Hitler. The Nuremberg Tribunal convicted 24 IG Farben board members and executives on the basis of mass murder, slavery and other crimes. Incredibly, most of them had been released by 1951 and continued to consult with German corporations. The Nuremberg Tribunal dissolved IG Farben into Bayer, Hoechst and BASF, each company 20 times as large as IG Farben in 1944. For almost three decades after WWII, BASF, Bayer and Hoechst (Aventis) filled their highest position, chairman of the board, with former members of the Nazi regime..... www.sourcewatch.org...
I'm not so certain I agree with your assessment about Alpha males and female.
Not in regards to genetics at least.
I do agree the Alpha male and female is not often found....
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
....So many people claim we had no foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor or 9/11.
This is a completely false claim due to those lost pieces of history many are too lazy to sift through....
Someone did do the sifting through history. I do not know if what he is saying is true because I have not chased down the original documents but it is certainly an interesting read.
Days of Infamy and
We can even see the same tried and true formula shown in the article being implemented today. I cover it in Napolitano sets stage for False Flag Terrorist Attack
We are? Playing sports and the nonsense we're seeing today? I don't see much of a correlation.
Neither I nor my sisters nor my children were trained for this from childhood. This is much too broad a statement, and I'm thinking this is a different beast.
...Their plan was so effective and so faithfully executed by its operatives in the US government that by 1974 the CED couldn't help but congratulate itself in another agricultural report called "A New US Farm Policy for Changing World Food Needs" for the efficiency of the tactics they employed to drive farmers from their land.[5]
The human cost of CED's plans were exacting and enormous.
CED's plans resulted in widespread social upheaval throughout rural America, ripping apart the fabric of its society destroying its local economies. They also resulted in a massive migration to larger cities. The loss of a farm also means the loss of identity, and many farmers' lives ended in suicide...
www.opednews.com...
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
When I was talking of genetics I was speaking of the species as a whole. You get Alphas in lions, wolves, coyotes, humans or any other social species. You do not get Alphas that is "leaders of the pack" in tigers because they are solitary.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
Of those animals who do form packs, you get two types. The first is one dominant male and a group of females and sub-adult offspring. In this case all adult males are driven off or killed. In the second type the dominant male will allow submissive adult males (sibs or sons) to live.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
Humans belong to the second type which means there is a "submissive gene" in our make-up. The elite of whatever era have breed for submissiveness. Serfs, Slaves, feudalism or similar "class" systems made sure the unwashed masses knew their place and did not get "uppity" If you believe Proto's All Roads Lead to Rome you could say the elite have been breeding submissiveness into the human race for 2000 years or more on an intentional basis.
Originally posted by crimvelvet
Is leadership learned???
Originally posted by crimvelvet
Yes I think so. From what I have seen very dominant human males often produce submissive offspring or they drive off their adult offspring. It is probably why the elite send their kids away to be educated. A dominant male is going to have a bit of a problem raising another dominant male unless he is very very self-aware.
I saw the challenges in my family between my father and brother but being female I never took part. Actually I just quietly went my own way and kept my mouth shut, much easier
Originally posted by crimvelvet
While on the subject of Alphas I would like to bring up the subject of the pseudo-Alpha. I really really hate these people because they are SOooo dangerous.
The pseudo-Alpha is not a real leader. He wants the position of authority because he is ego tripping. He often has the charm and charisma to grab a leadership position from a real leader but is usually lazy, shallow and not particularly intelligent.
I have seen a lot of these people in social organizations and in industry. They alway leave a mess behind for others to clean-up but they always charm their way out of any blame. Unfortunately I think these pseudo-Alphas often show up in politics.
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
....So many people claim we had no foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor or 9/11.
This is a completely false claim due to those lost pieces of history many are too lazy to sift through....
Someone did do the sifting through history. I do not know if what he is saying is true because I have not chased down the original documents but it is certainly an interesting read.
Days of Infamy and
We can even see the same tried and true formula shown in the article being implemented today. I cover it in Napolitano sets stage for False Flag Terrorist Attack
[color=ffff000]The formula for all False-Flag Operations is the Hegelian Dialectic.
Abstract, negative, concrete.
Introduce an abstract idea.
Create a negative hype and decry repercussions.
Then it happens and cements that those in power were right all along.
Even if they used deniable assets to work their terrorism.
There have been prominent figures throughout history attempting to educate us to this illusion of freedom, and somehow they all end up silent:
Hey phatpackage! Good to see you posting and asking the high quality questions.
but I hope it will not offend
You have recognized and seen both sides of the coin so to speak
Why do both fields of thought seem to mimic the other in the end?
We can agree to disagree right?
Why is that when we see a rise in diversity of opinion, a segment of ATS members automatically assume some nefarious reason?
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by crimvelvet
There's one group who defines everything as black or white, left or right, and so one. But what I would just love to know is why some people don't. Why do we see a different picture than they do?
I realize that I'm in my own head and know I make an effort to understand the partisan way, but I can't. Not really. I'm not wired that way. So what is it that makes us different? What caused it?
Critical thinking is a rarity.
Embrace your gift.
...Also, in reading this it came to me that perhaps being part of a "group" or being "agreed" with or acting out of character to be "like" simply isn't as important to some as to others....
Originally posted by xuenchen
Perhaps much like the agendas in the Israel / Israel's Enemies Hegelian Dialectic.
The world sees many false flags on all sides in the Middle-East .... BOTH end up profiting somehow !
the MSM tweeks the stories with the "Tri-View" trick ...... TV and newspapers always show:
1. pictures
2. words that don't match the pictures
3. captions that match "none of the above"
it's a classic "view".
Quote from : Wikipedia : Overton Window
The Overton window, in political theory, describes a "window" in the range of public reactions to ideas in public discourse, in a spectrum of all possible options on a particular issue.
It is named after its originator, Joseph P. Overton, former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Dialectic : Hegelian Dialectic
...
The formula, Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis, does not explain why the Thesis requires an Antithesis.
However, the formula, Abstract-Negative-Concrete, suggests a flaw in any initial thesis—it is too abstract and lacks the negative of trial, error and experience.
The same applies to the formula, Immediate-Mediated-Concrete.
For Hegel, the Concrete, the Synthesis, the Absolute, must always pass through the phase of the Negative, that is, Mediation.
This is the actual essence of what is popularly called Hegelian Dialectics.
...
Originally posted by crimvelvet
reply to post by ~Lucidity
...Also, in reading this it came to me that perhaps being part of a "group" or being "agreed" with or acting out of character to be "like" simply isn't as important to some as to others....
Yes I think that is very true.
I was about eight or nine when I made the decision I rather be my own person than conform to a group just to be liked. I can remember sitting at the kitchen table and having a long discussion about it with my Mom.
(Gee, I guess you were right about learning to be a leader, or at least independent SpartanKingLeonidas)
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
that is a great "snap shot" of the main theme of Hegelian philosophies.
it takes two to tango (or three, or four, etc !).
the Israel and their enemies dilemma is a bit unique.......many "operations" simultaneously occurring in a limited area.
and I always thought Beck's twists were familiar !
thank you