It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Justice Department under President Barack Obama has taken a harder line against anti-abortion activists accused of trying to block access to clinics, suing at least a half-dozen of them under a federal law that lay mostly dormant during the Bush administration.
The lawsuits "send a very strong message that extremists are not going to be able to make threats, much less carry out threats, without consequences," Spillar said. "The sooner and more diligent the response, then you don't get a ratcheting up and ultimately a horrific act of violence."
Congress has been voting every year since the 1970s to prevent federal funds from paying for abortions.
Originally posted by jefwane
You know I think Eric Holder is probably the worst most corrupt Attorney General ever. A Bankster Cartel blackmails everyone in America via Congress and Hank Paulson and not one major criminal prosecution of anyone in any of the bailed out entities. Yet this Justice department seems to focus on cases that are politically divisive like abortion and race.
The ineptitude of this Attorney General is enough reason for me to make sure I do all within my capability to make sure Obama doesn't get a second term.
Originally posted by Loki
I'm a realist, and sometimes people like me need to remind you about the reality of the situation.
Originally posted by Loki
The comparative cost of abortion vs. the cost of placing a child in foster care as a ward of the state for 18 years is miniscule. Clothes, food, doctor visits, montly stipends, school trips, emergency care, it's all money money money. Kids are ludicrously expensive.
Originally posted by Loki
Unwanted orphan children that become the responsibility of state governments and taxpayers.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Abortions also fall on the laps of taxpayers, why not allow taxpayers to decide which route they would prefer?
Originally posted by rogerstigers
But abortions *don't* fall into the laps of the taxpayers, as I pointed out in an earlier post...
Congress has been voting every year since the 1970s to prevent federal funds from paying for abortions.
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 251 to 175 Wednesday to permanently ban that funding.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Well they have all the rights to protest and voice their opinion. They however don't have the right to block venues of travel to / from the places.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Well they have all the rights to protest and voice their opinion. They however don't have the right to block venues of travel to / from the places.
They do have a right to protest, but once they verbally assault or physically block someone from entering the venue, it is no longer a protest, it is harassment and possibly criminal mischief.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Well they have all the rights to protest and voice their opinion. They however don't have the right to block venues of travel to / from the places.
They do have a right to protest, but once they verbally assault or physically block someone from entering the venue, it is no longer a protest, it is harassment and possibly criminal mischief.
And cutting a breathing unborn human being from its host and barring their entry into this wondrous world is just medical procedure I guess.
So hands up those who say their is no kife before the first breath outside the womb....you know that for sure?
Because many people remember existebce in the womb, our spirit is tested there,or do we all just believe what we are told, not what we experience?
So much passion to defend the practice of mass abortion, some hear have spoken of God s word.
The question we should all ask perhaps is "Would you have wanted your Mother to have terminated your journey into this life?
So what makes you different than the millions upon millions of spirits who have had their chance for life stopped mid stream?
Are we so stupid as to believe that given a choice that unborn would rather have had life over death regardless of poverty or foster life?
Some people have had wonderful lives despite childhood neglect, poverty ect.
Who are any of us to say stopping any life is OK?
Abortion may be the right of those raped or mentally unable to go the term, but should it be encouraged?
A quick fix and another pot of Gold for the Doctor?
IN Australia Muslims mothers regularly have multiple children, they are encouraged to make life and cherish it, the Christians are encouraged to make life , but only cherish it if you tick all the optimum boxes.
Otherwise it will be best for the unborn child to kill it, or God forbid it may grow up poor or with a single parent.
The hypocrisy of this so called civilised world truly could make Angels Puke.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
And cutting a breathing unborn human being from its host and barring their entry into this wondrous world is just medical procedure I guess.
...our spirit is tested there...
...some hear have spoken of God s word...
...truly could make Angels Puke...