Commandos told to kill Osama bin Laden because of fears he was wearing suicide vest, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 5-5-2011 @ 08:08 AM by micpsi
Originally posted by ImBlake
New poster, long-time lurker here (6 years ha). If 9/11 was an inside job like MANY claim it to have been, and bin Laden was America's scapegoat, the one to blame for the attacks, then they had to kill him, not capture him. It could have come out that he was working for the US gov't and the US gov't couldn't have that. They said "Let's put an end to this 9/11 chapter by finally taking him out. We're at a low point in America at the moment, and this will help to re-patriotize (?) our people." But he could not be taken alive... if the whole "9/11 was an inside job conspiracy" is true.

Looking forward to contributing to the boards folks!


Yes, you are absolutely right. However, another scenario is that this was not Osama but one of his many lookalikes, used over the years by the CIA to make the occasional video or audio tape whenever the CIA wanted to put more life into the phony war on terrorism. Remember how Jack Ruby silenced the patsy Lee Harvey Oswald before he could reveal that he was working for the CIA as a double-agent spying on pro-Castro people and that he did not shoot JFK? I agree that the same motive was behind this attack, but I am not sure it was Osama. It could have been one of his lookalikes whose contract with the CIA was suddenly "terminated with extreme prejudice" because the CIA had decided they did not want the world to believe that Osama was still alive. That would explain why his body was dumped at sea - no body to be returned to Osama's relatives for them to uncover the deception. And, of course, why no photos were released of the man's body.


reply posted on 5-5-2011 @ 08:29 AM by Britguy
reply to post by newcovenant


Just who are we all sticking up for here?
All we want is the truth of the matter, not contradictory ever-changing "facts" and spin. So far, few "facts" have been presented that have not been withdrawn or proved inaccurate.
The whole "fog of combat" excuse is laughable too. This was not some bloody raging battle, it was a small incursion against a house with a few occupants. If they cannot present a full and accurate accounting of a brief period of time from a few players within minutes, then there is something seriously wrong and we are being played.


reply posted on 5-5-2011 @ 08:36 AM by ShaunHatfield
reply to post by mr-lizard


Alive? Sorry Pal, dead is the only way that this waste of breath should have been taken. Wrap his corpse in pig skin then inject swine guts into his body.. ON VIDEO!

I see allot of people speaking up and saying OBL wasn't responsible for 9/11 and this was an illegal assasination.

Lets get past that portion... (Even though, I feel he is responsible for 9/11 also)
1) 1992 bombing of the Gold Mihor Hotel in Aden
2) Bin Laden funded the Luxor massacre of November 1997
3) November 14, 1995 truck bombing of a U.S.-operated Saudi National Guard training center in Riyadh
4) 1998 United States embassy bombings in Africa;

The world is a better place without this SCUM !!

The US offered the body to the Saudi's (which i wouldn't have) They didn't want him... Why would we bring the body back? Feed it to the pigs!

Alive you say? So we can spend Billions on security and the court fiasco it would turn into. Some of you will say that the US govt. doesn't want him to have a speaking platform... really? Like the man couldn't have released a video AT ANY TIME, saying anything he wanted to. Lord knows, the media would have aired it..

Some others, with mental deficiencies, keep saying "He didn't do 9/11 and they don't want him to tell the world that"

Really?
Osama Bin Laden 2004

"We decided to destroy towers in America," he said. "God knows that it had not occurred to our mind to attack the towers, but after our patience ran out and we saw the injustice and inflexibility of the American-Israeli alliance toward our people in Palestine and Lebanon, this came to my mind."



Guilty as charged... "Hey Osama, can you feed the fish for me?"


reply posted on 5-5-2011 @ 09:22 AM by AshleyD
reply to post by Aggie Man


The OP article says it was a double shot to the head, which is totally consistent with a belief that OBL may have been wearing an explosive vest. The article makes no mention of a shot to the chest.


Google 'Osama shot in head and chest' for the original story. THIS article may make no mention of a chest shot but others do.


reply posted on 5-5-2011 @ 09:24 AM by Aggie Man
Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by Aggie Man


The OP article says it was a double shot to the head, which is totally consistent with a belief that OBL may have been wearing an explosive vest. The article makes no mention of a shot to the chest.


Google 'Osama shot in head and chest' for the original story. THIS article may make no mention of a chest shot but others do.


Obviously! My point is that if the OP article is inaccurate in one aspect of it's story, then how can we blindly accept the remaining portions of it?
edit on 5-5-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 4 days ago with 94 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 8 days ago with 73 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 6 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags
3 NATO Protesters Face Terror Conspiracy Charges
  Posted 10 days ago with 46 member flags