It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama "overruled" in decision to kill Osama

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Obama "overruled" in decision to kill Osama


www.colony14.net

NewsFlavor.com’s infamous unnamed White House insider provides Ulsterman with more behind the scenes details of the decision to kill Osama bin Laden. He states, “I was told—in these exact terms, ‘we overruled him’ (Obama). I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how [CIA director] Leon Panetta worked around [Obama’s] ‘persistent hesitation to act.’ There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by …Obama, simply because there was no specific position from [Obama] to do so.
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:20 PM
link   
Hey everyone, Colony14.net has a great Obama time-line going and I stumbled upon some interesting news there. Apparently Barack Obama never made a decision on whether or not to kill Osama and after a long wait military officials gave the go ahead. I found this pretty funny since he's spent the last couple of days gloating about "his" victory. I believe the information was leaked by Hillary and her team.

www.colony14.net
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:32 PM
link   
I've never heard of your source before, but I could definitely see Obama hesitating to take action, any action, since he's done it before.

The BP oil spill and Libya come to mind (not that I agree with the Libya action, but he definitely sat on his hands).



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:39 PM
link   
Obama knows his place.

The neo con PNAC crusade is alive and well and on schedule.

www.rawstory.com...

The youth of America need to be preparing for new and glorious wars.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:55 PM
link   
The "White House Insider Ulsterman" has already been debunked as a fake source.

In fact ATS's own Outcast Searcher has proven this "source" is fictitious;
About this "White House Insider"...What do we know? (abovetopsecret.com)
edit on 4-5-2011 by Blackmarketeer because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


I just did a quick read through of the thread and it seemed like people were saying there was no reason to believe him/ no information about him. This doesn't necessarily mean he's not completely correct though, right? Someone compared him to Deepthroat and even though there wasn't any reason to believe what he was saying he ended up being completely correct. I'm still new here and maybe I missed something on that thread so please let me know if I did.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   
So I guess it's true about the president not being the highest official, looks like the President isn't in charge anymore. He's just the guy with a mouth to his ear and a teleprompter to his face.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:55 PM
link   
um. no. Deep Throat's information was passing through a respected journalist at the Washington Post, who would have known if the information was reliable or just ramblings. By the time said information reached the public it had been vetted.

Anyone can blog all the B.S. they want on the Web, it's unvetted and pure fiction. You notice all his "insider information" is strictly reactionary and largely jumps on whatever anti-Obama sentiment is being circulated about in the right-wing blogosphere. Another hater cranking out fake stories.
edit on 4-5-2011 by Blackmarketeer because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
The "White House Insider Ulsterman" has already been debunked as a fake source.

In fact ATS's own Outcast Searcher has proven this "source" is fictitious;
About this "White House Insider"...What do we know? (abovetopsecret.com)
edit on 4-5-2011 by Blackmarketeer because: (no reason given)


And yet people will skip this fact and continue to post foolish jargon.
Thanks for the heads up.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by BrianC
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


I just did a quick read through of the thread and it seemed like people were saying there was no reason to believe him/ no information about him. This doesn't necessarily mean he's not completely correct though, right? Someone compared him to Deepthroat and even though there wasn't any reason to believe what he was saying he ended up being completely correct. I'm still new here and maybe I missed something on that thread so please let me know if I did.


Well since you are new it is ALWAYS prudent to vett your source as credible. If truth is on your side it can withstand great scrutiny otherwise your source will be eviscerated by astute ATS members and you will be accused of spreading disinfo which in my humble opinion you are doing right now.

Bottom line : Always consider the source.

Nice work Blackmarketeer.
And Big hat tip to Outkast Searcher.
edit on 4-5-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by BrianC
 


But dont feel too bad about being accused of being a "disinfo agent" its kind of like a rite of passage. If you DONT get accused of that at some point, you arent contributing enough.

Welcome to ATS.


And dont let anyone tell you what to post, either. Conformity is highly overrated. Even things that end up being discredited have value to someone. If only to teach them what NOT to read.
edit on 4-5-2011 by Illusionsaregrander because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:06 PM
link   
ok, sounds like I screwed up here and I definitely don't want to be accused of spreading disinfo, is there a way for me to delete my post? Sorry about this again, I'm new and love this site so hopefully I can bring some real news in someday



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 

I'm calling BS on the way you used the term BS as you did

deep throat may have been part of the planned disposal of NIXON
that was not honest journalism
it was theater

like the investigation of who murdered KENNEDY bin laden


Silent Coup, is a bestselling 1992 book written by Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin in which they contend that former Nixon White House counsel John Dean orchestrated the 1972 Watergate burglary at Democratic National Committee headquarters to protect his future wife, Maureen Biner, by removing information linking her to a call-girl (prostitute) ring that worked for the DNC. The authors also argued that Alexander Haig was not Deep Throat but was a key source for Bob Woodward, who as a Naval officer had briefed Haig at the White House in 1969 and 1970.[49][50]

en.wikipedia.org...

and thats just ONE set of differing evidences from the OS of nixon
you believed an OS
shame on you



edit on 4-5-2011 by Danbones because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-5-2011 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:11 PM
link   
My - what a nice cover story to protect him as an asset with an extensive network of his own contacts into these groups.

Does it work well? I assume it does, since so many people buy it without a moment's hesitation.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:13 PM
link   
reply to post by BrianC
 


having an opinion
and spreading disinfo are two different things

we know obama can't even talk without a teleprompter
It is so well known that that is why his pre election polls show him in the UBER basement


edit on 4-5-2011 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 


I actually figured this was theater in a political sense as well. But I figured the information came from Camp Hillary (as a lot of great information against Obama does) as an attempt to snub Obama making the message correct but the reasons behind it dishonest and politicized. Anyways, it turns out I was completely wrong as to the source and its validity so I'm going to do more research since the story sounds incredibly plausible



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:14 PM
link   
reply to post by kinda kurious
 


Outcast's post on this "WH insider" is an excellent example of critical thinking and not simply accepting at face value anything that gets published to the Web. Glad you appreciated it!


reply to post by BrianC
 


Lol, don't feel bad, my first post on this site was from a source that also turned out to be less than honest. The Web is a great medium for keeping us all connected but it also allows every crackpot the chance to spread dis-info and vitriol disguised as "news".

Before posting on a topic I'll research it thoroughly, Google is okay as a starting point but don't forget to screen it for hoax or bias; snopes and factcheck.org can also help in those regards.

Anyways, welcome to the site.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:19 PM
link   
reply to post by BrianC
 


there is so much confusion
that everthing has to be examined

just the disinfio from the white house alone should have disqualified them as a source of everything
but you still see people using them as sources

I mean look at OBAMA's track record
ppppft

one tactic for disinfo is to put good inf out through a known shill to discredit the truth
before it gets out from a quality source
so everything has to be examined carefully



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 11:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 


So... if Deep Throat was B.S. then why'd Nixon resign? "OMG they're printing a fake story about me I'd better resign!"

Deep Throat's identity is also known now and he was indeed a "Washington Insider", FBI Associate Director Mark Felt. The information he provided was about Watergate, and that, my friend, was a true conspiracy perpetrated by Nixon.



posted on May, 5 2011 @ 10:38 AM
link   
hmmmm.. so now 'they' are backpeddeling to distance obama from the 'action'.....


In March Barack Obama began chairing a series of five national security meetings. At the last of these, on Friday 29 April, while the world's attention was on the royal wedding taking place in London, he gave the order to mount an operation.





At that meeting, at 8.20am in the diplomatic room at the White House, Obama met his national security adviser Thomas Donilon, counter-terrorism adviser John O Brennan, and other senior national security aides to go through the detailed plan to attack the compound and sign the formal orders authorising it, the New York Times reported.


source

this is saying he sat thru a detailed plan of attack 2 days BEFORE the attack

BUT didnt this latest report say obama knew nothing about the raid?!?



"Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order."

AND

"There was not going to be another delay as had happened 24 hour earlier. The operation was at this time effectively unknown to President Barack Obama or Valerie Jarrett and it remained that way until AFTER it had already been initiated. President Obama was literally pulled from a golf outing and escorted back to the White House to be informed of the mission."


source

and they wonder why nobody believes obama or the rest os washington.....backpeddeling to distance obama since alot of people dont seem to be happy with the outcome and they dont have any real verifiable thrid party verification that osama was killed

there is no hope



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join