reply to post by TheDarkestHour
i have been personally exploring the idea that not all humans are actually self-aware. The moment when an individual decides to... "think about
what they are thinking," is possibly when such a self-aware entity is formed. To clarify, by "entertain" i mean i have simply thought about it as
and not an inevitability. Certainly many people would not openly accept such an idea, and i have to admit, its not a comfortable
idea to this one either. Interesting though..
Such an idea is based in my own explorations of the actual avenues that things manifest here. This led me to see our body (and its products) as one
part of our being, and the "spirit" or "observer" being the other half. By "being" we allow both sides to balance and co-exist, but as we get
caught up in one or the other, or specific resultant systems (most commonly, thought processes) as being the sole experiential form of "being,"
balance and growth can not occur. i see that the observer is an electromagnetic body that exists here, in this material world, only through the
magnetic bonds formed through what has been referred to as "chakras" throughout some religions. i suspect that such things, if they exist, are EM
pools that are created by the chemical/electrical impulses of our body. These magnetically link the observer into the action, or the body. i also
feel that these EM bodies (spirit/observer) follow the same orbital structure pattern as everything else we can observe at the "edges" of our scaled
perspective, though perhaps in a different area of time and space (not the best analogy, but i think it gets the "concept" across for those who are
willing to go beyond their own context to try to understand what i am saying).
So,a little explanation to get to the point
The magnetism and "pull" of some systems can easily string along others that are not conscious of their own movement. Just as many are not able to
feel the earth moving around the sun, many are not able to feel their own movement on many levels. There is no "balance," or base state. Decisions
about what we see are already defined in such systems, which i personally refer to as the "yea/nay" phenomena. This could be a result of "being"
solely in one part of our system, which is relegated specifically to duality. Most frequently this is the mind, and other resultant experiences of
that system. Structurally, i feel this can be compared to the difference between say a planet or a star, and an asteroid belt. When a body (say a
comet) moves through an asteroid field, it picks up many "followers." In this way the orbits of the involved systems (the "stupidity of the
mass") may be a result of actual pulling and moving by some systems that have more pull, for a variety of reasons. Sometimes done intentionally,
sometimes not. When many systems get together, the pull of the overall system tends to drive the "experience" for all partial systems involved.
When one is not able to be "self-aware," in this context, the decisions have already been made and there is no room for growth. Such systems will
simply be swept up by other systems orbits, as we may similarly see with the formation of various celestial bodies.
To control the masses, all one needs to do is present a well-thought out yea/nay scenario that is designed to create division instead of co-operative