posted on May, 3 2011 @ 05:51 PM
We provided a great deal of information with great haste in order to inform you … about the operation,” Carney said during a briefing, in a
concession that administration officials have erred in their details of the raid on bin Laden's compound outside of Islamabad, Pakistan. “Obviously
some of the information came in piece by piece and is being reviewed and updated and elaborated on.” Reading from a script carefully crafted by the
Defense Department, Carney clarified that bin Laden was not armed with a gun when he was killed, contrary to some reports that he fired back at U.S.
military operatives. In addition, White House counterinsurgency adviser John Brennan was wrong when he suggested Monday that one of bin Laden’s
wives was killed serving as a human shield for bin Laden during gunfire.
Yea, I know it is hard to release factual breaking news, but in regards to the history of the government I think we can error on our side. That is if
it smells fishy, it probably is in some manner not the real and plausible facts.
This will be just as the 911 incident, and the recent Birth Certificate issue, an ever ongoing debate as to what really happened, what is really
factually true, and are you a sheep or a independent thinker that realizes we never will get the real truth on any issue, at least not from our
government. That does not mean there is not any truth in the statements, only that it is plausible that we will not get the total facts of the
Personally, I think the story and timing is suspicious. I also think the burial at sea is a complete fallacy to put a Obama " I am your muslim
brother" muslim spin on the event.
If we had a spine, we would say we killed him!!! Here is the body, and then dispose of the corpse any way we think is appropriate. If a muslim burial
was appropriate, then we should have had a muslim religious leader do it, televised with commercials, otherwise give the fellow a christian burial and
let God deal with his soul.