It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Next 3 Presidents of the US

page: 2
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by HoonieSkoba

Originally posted by MindWarrior
The masses wouldn't be able to handle the first woman president also being the first black president.


I think this statement is amazing condescending and a load of crap.


Roger that HoonieSkoba, the logical thinkers, who are growing in numbers are rejecting the party line and actually thinking for themselves...


This is a GOOD sign...

m...




posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 01:11 PM
link   
If we're NOT careful, it will be Bush, Bush & Bush. This administration is not willing to leave White House and if they do...they will be kicking and screaming on the way OUT.....Be careful what you wish for...you just might get it.....



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 05:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by MindWarrior


People keep saying Bush has lied, when Kerry has been the one that we keep catching telling lies..oops flip-flops, almost everytime he makes a speech.

If Kerry wins, the American public will never know the truth about anything, everything will be a flip-flop with Kerry

Kerry is a liar but Bush is a bigger one. Would things be better under Kerry? Yes, but nothing will *really* change... just some things on the surface.




I really think Bush will win again

You forget, he never "won" in the first place. He "stole".






Exactly how did he "steal"?



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 05:37 PM
link   
I still like my idea of bi-partisan collaberation to let Kerry kill Bush 2004, McCain kill Kerry 2008, the Edwards kill Hillary in 2012 primary...

And see what happens with Edwards versus McCain in 2012. Would it matter? A simple procession of elimination of each party's perceived "extremists" moving ever closer to TimeWave Zero in 2012 when all novelty ceases to exist and we run carbon copy candidates against each other.

Imagine even trying to get mad about McCain or Edwards (though the brain candy media will try). My moderate conservative is better than your moderate conservative!!!


I think this is the plan. Probably all laid out by Bilderberg already.


Then it's Obama time! The first black conservative democrat President that officially ends all novelty and diversity in the Universe.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 05:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by MindWarrior

Kerry is a liar but Bush is a bigger one. Would things be better under Kerry? Yes, but nothing will *really* change... just some things on the surface.

You forget, he never "won" in the first place. He "stole".


What did he steal?...can't people get it already? he won, let it be already.... The votes were counted and recounted and still Bush won... just get over it...


And please....give a list on what Bush lied about....


[edit on 31-7-2004 by Muaddib]



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 06:09 PM
link   
The globalists have already declared it.

Kerry wins 2004.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 06:37 PM
link   
if presidents are selected not elected...what would the elite do? afterall, kerry is skull and bones like george.
so there may really be no difference in the overall agenda, just the delivery.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 06:37 PM
link   


I think this statement is amazing condescending and a load of crap. The country isn't perfect, but 'the masses' are much more accepting of diversity than 30 years ago. I have met very few people who would vote against someone because they're black or a woman, regardless of their political affiliations.

The fact of the matter is there is so much blind hatred in the US.. so much misguided anger. A society based on zero-tolerance has adapted that principle to include anyone whom they disagree with. I don't think skin color should matter but it does, that is a fact.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 06:44 PM
link   


Exactly how did he "steal"?

The things that happened were well documented. Im not going to get into it all in this thread.. assuming you can spell and type, go to google, and search for "2000 stolen election"

-minority voters denied their right to vote because of false-felon lists sent from Texas
-Georgie's brother taking care of Florida on the inside
-Cheneys fishing buddy, Scalia, taking care of the surpreme court on the inside

It's quite clear what took place in 2000 with Florida, the only people who think Bush was actually elected are the ignorant and/or the uninformed.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by MindWarrior


Exactly how did he "steal"?

The things that happened were well documented. Im not going to get into it all in this thread.. assuming you can spell and type, go to google, and search for "2000 stolen election"

-minority voters denied their right to vote because of false-felon lists sent from Texas
-Georgie's brother taking care of Florida on the inside
-Cheneys fishing buddy, Scalia, taking care of the surpreme court on the inside

It's quite clear what took place in 2000 with Florida, the only people who think Bush was actually elected are the ignorant and/or the uninformed.


Well, if it is on Google, it must be true!

Explain the "false felons" claim.

How about the the fact that all major news networks declared Gore the winner before the western part of Florida's polls were closed (which is coincidentaly Replublican).

How exactly did Jeb take care of Florida from the inside?

I guess Scalia was responsible for the other votes on the Supreme Court?

The fact is, Bush won the election. While it may not be popular, by the laws of this country he is the President of The United States.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:01 PM
link   


Well, if it is on Google, it must be true!

Come on, are you inept? Google crawls the whole web. With correct keyword searches you can find information on about anything. It doesn't mean that information is accurate, only pertinent. If you're interested in learning about the subject then you'll do the research yourself.




Explain the "false felons" claim.

Mostly young black males (whom statistically vote democrat) sent on a list of felons from Texas to Florida (Bush-to-Bush) whom were turned down at the polling center. The problem was none of them were felons. I don't remember the exact number but I believe something like 60,000.




How about the the fact that all major news networks declared Gore the winner before the western part of Florida's polls were closed (which is coincidentaly Replublican).

How about the fact that a cousin of Bush who worked for FoxNews was the first to make the declaration and the rest of the media, not wanting to be late with the news, followed suit. Subsequently the court process was turned, by the media, into "Al Gore the Sore Loser"



I guess Scalia was responsible for the other votes on the Supreme Court?

The vote was along party lines and Scalia is the face of Fascism in the Supreme Court (which is why he was used as an example).



[edit on 31-7-2004 by MindWarrior]



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by MindWarrior


Well, if it is on Google, it must be true!

Come on, are you inept? Google crawls the whole web. With correct keyword searches you can find information on about anything. It doesn't mean that information is accurate, only pertinent. If you're interested in learning about the subject then you'll do the research yourself.




Explain the "false felons" claim.

Mostly young black males (whom statistically vote democrat) sent on a list of felons from Texas to Florida (Bush-to-Bush) whom were turned down at the polling center. The problem was none of them were felons. I don't remember the exact number but I believe something like 60,000.




How about the the fact that all major news networks declared Gore the winner before the western part of Florida's polls were closed (which is coincidentaly Replublican).

How about the fact that a cousin of Bush who worked for FoxNews was the first to make the declaration and the rest of the media, not wanting to be late with the news, followed suit. Subsequently the court process was turned, by the media, into "Al Gore the Sore Loser"



I guess Scalia was responsible for the other votes on the Supreme Court?

The vote was along party lines and Scalia is the face of Fascism in the Supreme Court (which is why he was used as an example).



[edit on 31-7-2004 by MindWarrior]


I have done the research. Bush won. He is President.

Texas has a list of 60,000 black males who live in Florida? Does Jeb have enough power to get this list and prevent them from voting?

If the election were fixed, would a "Bush Cousin" really call the Florida election before the western part of the state polls were closed?

Imagine the vote being on party lines. I guess that is why they are selected by the President and confirmed by the Senate.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by SIMPLEMIND
project_pisces, that was perfectly funny! Maybe they were separated at birth!



thats sam neil isnt it?



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:42 PM
link   
Badnarik said on his site that if Bush wins, Hillary will win in 2008. I'd have to say I agree.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:51 PM
link   
I have to say, if ever the Hillary in '08 scenario materialized, possibly for 8 years, what I would find more scary is the scenario of two families dominating American politics for a full quarter-century - the Bushes and the Clintons. Bush 89-93, Clinton 93-01, Bush 01-09, Clinton 09-17... is this democracy or oligarchy?

I have the utmost respect for Hillary Clinton and what she stands for... but if she wins in '08, it'll be an unprecedented stretch of family rule in the U.S... the Bushes are bad enough. And there are plenty other excellent politicians to carry on Bill and Hillary's legacy.

I'm beginning to think that Americans didn't get rid of monarchy as much as they thought in 1776.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:51 PM
link   
The trith of the matter is that Bush stole the election and he's preparing to steal it again. If 80 percent of the nation voted for Kerry, Bush would still win since the tally counters are HUGE contributors to Bush and the Republican party. It is common knowledge that the "voting" machines can be mocked with, and WILL be tampered with. Take it to the Supreme Court? ha ha ha!!! Republicans....

By the way...have you people read that our president is on antipsychotic medicine for his erratic behavior??? The news source of this is none other than Reuters.
I would seriously consider this small matter. The president of the United States of America should be of sound mind and body in order to lead this nation properly. Its very scary to me that our leader is hearing voices from God, quoting bible verses, etc. Not the norm.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 10:54 PM
link   


I have done the research. Bush won

I doubt there is a cure for what ails you.



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 11:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by MindWarrior



I have done the research. Bush won

I doubt there is a cure for what ails you.



And what is that, reality?



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 11:19 PM
link   
maybe kerry will be elected twice, but, he will be assinated the second time, and who takjes over the term when a pres is dead? the vp, and then hilary... i think that last one is a long shot, did you have a vision, or is this a guess?



posted on Jul, 31 2004 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by MindWarrior

It's quite clear what took place in 2000 with Florida, the only people who think Bush was actually elected are the ignorant and/or the uninformed.


Perhaps the only people who are ignorant, or uninformed are those who think Bush stole the election....


Do a search on google about the recount on Florida.




top topics



 
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join