posted on May, 2 2011 @ 08:57 PM
With the actual reporting of Osama Bin Laden dead, the US government and the media is going to use it to try to build up the we are winning the war to
draw attention away from what it is really doing. This is the oldest trick in DC and that any government has at its disposal. For years they have
used such to direct the publics attention, knowing that they can not censor information in the US or the world for that matter, and the truth never
stays buried. So lets look at what all is going on and try to make a guess at what the next move would be, if it is not what we have been lead to
believe and what could be the possible target by the powers at be.
The use a nuke would undoubtedly bring the worlds attention not only to the country that had the event happen but also to those who would lay claim to
such. It would be a large show of force and cause more problems than create solutions. If for example a nuke was used, within 2 weeks the rest of
the governments and ultimately the world would know what country that the device came from, as each country, with nuclear material would have its own
signature on it, and it could be traced back to the original country, as that is what all we have been led to believe. An atomic weapon is one that
is very complex and pretty much not something you can smuggle in or get into any country, let alone hide, as the radiation would be a dead give away.
Some poor schmuck would have to be around to guard and die in the process, so if that is not the case, then it would have to be from one of the
countries with nuclear capacity to do such, thus they run the risk of world wide condemnation.
So if you were going to nuke something in a country, getting only one shot, maybe 2 at the most what targets would you aim at to do the most damage
and possibly freeze the entire country? New York is not a target, as it would not do much to the country, that is only stocks. If I were to make a
target with a nuclear weapon, knowing the state of the world, and having the capacity to do such, it would be right where the backing of the currency
happens to be, where the money is and attack that, in one form or another. So follow the money, as that is where the next attack is going to be,
either on the area where the backing for the money is, say Fort Knox, or if you have more long term plans, and so far everything that is shown, turns
out to be long term plans, say approach a country with a large amount of any countries debt, and in this case I will use China as an example. If I
had the money and the backing to do it, either purchase the US debt that would be in the form of bonds, and use them as hostage to make the US do what
I wanted, or convince the Chinese government to demand repayment of the trillions that is owed to it, no longer desiring to have the paper, and that
said repayment would be due in a certain amount of time and it would have to be substantial, such as gold, emptying out the US reserves as repayment,
thus further devaluing the currency. As the US is on the brink of collapse, as a country, then publicly offering assistance to prevent such through
another country with conditions, strings attached, and dictate policy.
If that is too far fetched, there is one other way to do such and it would be more sneakier, and underhanded and that would be to use nature as an
advantage. Many areas are drought ridden, fires could easily be set and grow out of control, forcing many states to declare emergencies and all while
appearing to give aid, setting conditions to further have the citizens fully dependent on the federal government, forcing them to either comply and
get aid, or not comply and receive nothing. In either case it will prove for we the people to watch the news and see not only what they want us to
see, but what they do not want the public to see and notice.