It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Just Chris
Just beat me to posting this!
It's hard to tell. I believe it's legit, and eagerly await the debunkers on this one...
But why do you believe it's legit?
We know that CGI exists.
We know that it's entirely possible to fake this kind of video.
We know that there are plenty of people out there willing to do so.
There is no rational reason to believe this is not CGI. Unless you can find something in this video to prove otherwise, all intelligent people would have to go with the more plausible explanation, and no matter how much people might protest against it, the most plausible suggestion is that this is a fictional video created using CGI.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Just Chris
Just beat me to posting this!
It's hard to tell. I believe it's legit, and eagerly await the debunkers on this one...
But why do you believe it's legit?
We know that CGI exists.
We know that it's entirely possible to fake this kind of video.
We know that there are plenty of people out there willing to do so.
There is no rational reason to believe this is not CGI. Unless you can find something in this video to prove otherwise, all intelligent people would have to go with the more plausible explanation, and no matter how much people might protest against it, the most plausible suggestion is that this is a fictional video created using CGI.
It looks like it was shot in the 1950's, though we have no proof of that, and no CGI before the mid-90's could achieve that life-life of an effect.
The pulsating blood vessels in the head and neck would be extremely hard if not impossible to achieve in decades past, maybe today it is possible.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Just Chris
Just beat me to posting this!
It's hard to tell. I believe it's legit, and eagerly await the debunkers on this one...
But why do you believe it's legit?
We know that CGI exists.
We know that it's entirely possible to fake this kind of video.
We know that there are plenty of people out there willing to do so.
There is no rational reason to believe this is not CGI. Unless you can find something in this video to prove otherwise, all intelligent people would have to go with the more plausible explanation, and no matter how much people might protest against it, the most plausible suggestion is that this is a fictional video created using CGI.
It looks like it was shot in the 1950's, though we have no proof of that, and no CGI before the mid-90's could achieve that life-life of an effect.
The pulsating blood vessels in the head and neck would be extremely hard if not impossible to achieve in decades past, maybe today it is possible.
So you claim that because it looks like it was shot in the 50's then it must have been shot in the 50's?
Why do you think this? We know that any video can be made to look aged. This is just another CGI effect and lends absolutely no credibility to the video.
You can create a video now which looks like it was filmed in the 1940's, it's no different to using CGI to create the "alien".
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
I did say above we had no proof it was shot in the 1950's, I guess you missed that.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
EVEN IF it is CGI, it is very good CGI, very professional. If it were so easy, why don't we have amateurs making videos like this all the time? They do with UFO's....many hoaxes I agree, but occasionally there are verified UFO's.
Why has no one taken claim? Done more? Why don't more people do similar videos of aliens if it is so easy?
originally posted by: Rocker2013
The best explanation I can see is that someone wants a job in such a field and spends a couple of months creating something which successfully fools potentially millions of YouTube viewers - what better advertisement and example of their skills?
Whoever made his video could go to a studio tomorrow with prof that they made it and be in a highly paid career the very next day.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
Great point. However, to use this to advertise your skills, one must take credit for it. Use it on one's website, or post it on an individuals facebook site. Kind of defeats the purpose if one were to make it to showcase one's skills, yet remain anonymous? Do you see a logical flaw in your premise?
And this was released almost four years ago, and nothing indicating a claim of ownership has ever been found.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
So you flat out deny the possibility of this being real, given the fact that UFO's exist (and I mean truly unexplained aerial phenomenon)?
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
Anyway, as others have said, just because the footage is real, doesn't necessarily mean the being in the video is "alien".
originally posted by: seattlerat
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
I haven't read this entire thread yet so I hope someone has not already provided this, but I found a 10 minute video posted Summer 2014 that provides some interesting information, that, if true, in my opinion, adds even more credibility to the footage being discussed.
Basically, a UFO researcher vouchers for the media leak's integrity, and shows a (redacted) email that gives some tantalizing tidbits that I had not heard before, such as it possibly having a KGB origin, and the existence of an unedited version.
Also, I am still waiting for someone to replicate this! With the popularity of fake UFO footage being produced, I find it difficult to believe that there is nothing that I am aware of that depicts a creature purported to be an ET that comes close to the "realistic" style of the Skinny Bob film.
originally posted by: AthlonSavage
It looks real. If it is CGI then its good GGI.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
One thing that gets me about these alien greys with massive heads and tiny shoulders is could a frame that small support the weight of a head that large?.
I just can't see how it could walk and stuff without having the muscle to support its head.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
Found a good analysis of the video and it mentions ATS and it's members.
(nolink)/analyzing-the-latest-alleged-et-video-675/9517
Had trouble with the link put www. before it.
Hhhm must be a banned site from ATS.
Anyhow it says it is a fake.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: Sunraged
Did you not see where the tape came from?.
A known hoaxer and liar.
I would love it to be true also but I will not let my hope for ET being real cloud my judgement when looking at the evidence.
Through his investigation, Cameron determined that this Judy Fältskog is the same Judy Fältskog who, in 2010, claimed to be an astronomer working for NASA, and announced that she had intercepted and deciphered an intelligent signal from a nearby star. As Cameron points out, Fältskog’s credentials and claims turned out to be false. And research into Fältskog revealed interesting results including a history of hoaxing, identity changes, and even a sex change.