According to what I read, is that it's supposedly in respect to the Muslim faith. Wether this is true or false I cannot comment on, other than I find
it very convenient for them to do this. It's far too easy to just say that "yeah sure... it's him, we check... dna or such... you know, csi."
I dont buy it...
Some guy tried to debunk the Bhutto interview from 2007, a month before she was murdered, but I think she stepped in a hornets nest and was murdered
because of that. So in other words, Bin Laden was dead already back in 2001.
Omar Sheikh needed his ghost to stick around because of its charisma towards their cause, and the coalition needed him to be alive because of the huge
revenue that's tied into the war on terror. (heck... maybe Omar is even tied in with the cia just as Osama was)
10 years is a long time to keep a ghost alive and both sides knew that, so next step was to be taken:
Kill the ghost, make people believe that the most extreme cells of al qaeda now is in a mood of revenge, and carry out a new false flag / staged
attack in Europe or the US, so that the war machine can keep running.
Since Osama was already dead, they needed a pansy and this is who they'll be tossing in the sea one of the coming days. The only proof we'll ever have
that they really killed Osama Bin Laden is word of mouth, constructed evidence and some paid off residence in neighborhood where they "killed" that
The masses will buy this... already have, and the icing on the cake will be the (televised?) burial of this body at sea where noone can get near
The deception will go on, and none of us will rise to oppose it.
edit on 2/5/11 by flice because: (no reason given)
2/5/11 by flice because: (no reason given)