It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Osama Buried at Sea...within 24 hours. Really?

page: 10
103
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   
quoth the internet, "pics or it didn't happen."





posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   
As far as I know Osama Bin Ladin used to be a CIA employee until his death from a naturally occurring kidney disease in 1999 or 2000. He was even being treated for his disease in a CIA facility. Since that time the CIA are simply using his persona as a part of their propaganda.

Now assuming that this Osama Bin Ladin character is real, which obviously is being doubted, but none the less, that this operation took place not far from Islamabad, so near to the Pakistani Military Academy, is also highly incredible. If true it would thus mean that the Pakistani establishment were protecting him ? Is this once again another example of a "red herring" cast into our path so as to lead us away from the truth about 9/11 ? Did Pakistan orchestrate 9/11 ? Was 9/11 a Pakistani military act of war against the USA ? With or without Osama Bin Ladin is it possible that Pakistan orchestrated 9/11 ? Perhaps it was Pakistan who were operating all the propaganda war against terrorism, but all along being the terrorism ?

That this corpse of Osama Bin Ladin is simply tossed over the side of the ship ? Very idiotic since everyone will wonder why do that.

It reminds me of the controversy surrounding the Russian Bolshevik assassination of the Romanov royal family. Did it really happen. Why bury the proof of their death in an unmarked location. Why bury them at all ? Why not take their dead bodies back to Moscow so that all could see that the Romanovs were dead ? Is it possible that Russia is being ruled by its Royal Family living in a subterranean base in Siberia ? Such that the Soviet Revolution was a pretence ? So that all the anti-royal activities were being organised by the royals ? This continues ?

AVE RAEGINA CAELINA LA DEUS NOSTRA CAELI LA VERA DEUS
edit on 2/5/2011 by CAELENIUM because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheBlueShiroux
NOONE PAYS ATTENTION TO ANYTHING I SAY.
D:
i feel so ignored



heres some mood music to go with the wine

tunein.com...=53128&
(SomaFM: Doomed !)


oh well try this link: tunein.com...

click the Doomed yourself, the hyper link wont work


nice screen name there
what were you saying anyhoo?
edit on 2-5-2011 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
ok so when i hear this info i jumped right on aljazeera/english, their anchor woman stated this happened a week ago by a drone attack... at a palace in Pak.

if He was wanted by the US, why was he not buired in a Gitmo/Ft. Leavenworth cemetery...? or anything
like that for Absolute "justice"...???

even though its not, Absolutely True that he masterminded the attacks on the US (911)...

so when the POTUS came on he mentioned there was a firefight.... where is the disinfo coming from:

that is the real question we should be looking into....



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
bin Laden is dead, buried at sea so as not to have to go through the bs of finding a country that would accept the body for burial and to prevent the burial site from being turned into a shine. Simple enough and works for me. Now should he turn up in Kansas two weeks from now, boy will my face be red!

edit on 2-5-2011 by yrwehere1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
It's quite simply a cover up. Every aspect of Obama is fishy, from Financial reform to his birth certificate and now the proof that you actually had Bin Laden when you said you had him. No proof, just more lies. What happen to transparency? It has all but vanished. What happened to change? What, into socialism and bankrupcy. I have zero confidence in this administration. It's corruption and dishonesty cuts to the bone.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:05 PM
link   
I understand this is the place the nut jobs like to come. But, from my perspective the only group marginalized by his body being sent to sea are conspiracy theorists. Short term it might not seem that way, but long run they made the proper decision.

Also, a few notes I need to try to get out (though many before me have tried unsuccessfully)

-there will be video/photo evidence of death, this was insinuated at the press briefing today
-the picture currently circulating with "dead Osama" is the product of some guy in his house with Photoshop installed, nothing more



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   
Hahahaha
I'm sorry, but again, a BIG LOL at the americans!



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by soldita
 


that fake picture is being passed around as the real thing on MSM news sites, too. it's a bit embarrassing, and only seeks to feed people on the notion that this is all a sham, along with the "burying at sea" thing. it's been on the internet for a little over a year now. :3

just because i wasn't invited to picture-day doesn't mean it didn't happen, so i'll give pictures/video another day or two before i start calling people names. i didn't expect them the day they came out, anyhow. if we parade around the deaths of our hated enemies with videos/photos of their body, or even the body itself(like some have suggested), shortly after the death happens, we'd be no better than barbarians and it'd justify every attack against america.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:25 PM
link   
It's funny but my mother who doesn't believe in conspiracies at all said "no I don't believe that" when the news said this evening that his body had been buried at sea after they verified it was him".

Anyone else thinking TPTB are slipping or letting us see such discrepencies on purpose if "regular" people are even pointing out the glaring errors and ridiculousness of the official stories floating around?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:28 PM
link   
I'm curious as to whether his family also wanted no part of the body. I mean, the US was apparently tight enough with the Bin Laden's to allow them to leave the country by air when no other air travel was allowed after the attacks, and now, we kill him, test his DNA, and bury him at sea with no mention of their wishes? Did they disown him?
I, personally, have always felt that we allowed him to escape and that if he died, it was most likely from his kidney disease and his family let him die and be buried without fanfare. He served our purpose and still is. I can't help but wonder if this "new development" will lead us into a false flag event that will in turn cause us to wage war in a different country.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:31 PM
link   
I've been out of the loop lately due to other projects I've been working on and I haven't been haunting here near as much and my TV has been off. They just found this last night; is that right? Or did they find out he was dead a couple of day ago?

The reason I ask is because I turned the news on about 1/2 hour ago or so to MSNBC (first channel with no commercial lol) and the reporter was talking about how they confirmed his DNA as 100% his.

And he said, (and i'm paraphrasing here), that 'a couple of days ago, we weren't really sure but today, we're 100% sure due to positive DNA tests.' So two questions about this, really--one, was he found a couple of days ago? And two, doesn't it take more than a couple of days to test DNA?

I might be off base but I'm just going off my understanding. I am probably really lost. lol

Thanks.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:43 PM
link   
Why should the government provide evidence to you people? No matter what they give you, you all will say it's fake or doctored. If they provide photos, you will say they are faked. If they provide video, you will say it's edited. Hell, if the kept the body and invited you to examine it in person you all would say it has been kept preserved so they could use it to cover up some big scheme that is being planned.

No evidence the government provides will ever be good enough... so why bother trying?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
"A U.S. official said the burial decision was made after concluding that it would have been difficult to find a country willing to accept the remains. There was also speculation about worry that a grave site could have become a rallying point for militants.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive national security matters.

President Barack Obama said the remains had been handled in accordance with Islamic custom, which requires speedy burial, and the Pentagon later said the body was placed into the waters of the northern Arabian Sea after adhering to traditional Islamic procedures — including washing the corpse — aboard the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson."

news.yahoo.com...



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Stupe
 





No evidence the government provides will ever be good enough... so why bother trying?


To give ATS something to talk about.

BTW, I say they buried him in Crawford TX.
Just kidding



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by CoherentlyConfused
 


where all lost with you. There saying the DNA match up was with a sample they have of his sister



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:51 PM
link   
The DNA has been matched. The White House says DNA results will be in soon. There were two helicopters, there were four helicopters. The raid was a week ago. The raid was today. OBL, not a Muslim, was given proper Muslim burial...at sea(!) Others were present at the house and uninjured. (where are they now?)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by neowakko
There's nothing in the muslim practices that would require one to be buried in the sea.

Muslims believe that Adam was made from soil/earth. When one dies, they are to be returned to the earth. 6 feet under.

Never heard of dumping in the sea. Not in any known sect of islam.


It's called disposing of "evidence", hmm where did a quick disposal of evidence happen before, again, it escapes my mind.....



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by camaro68ss
reply to post by CoherentlyConfused
 


where all lost with you. There saying the DNA match up was with a sample they have of his sister



So for all we know it could be one of his many siblings?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by FuGGer
 


I don't know where this came from, but I have NO doubt its fake. I am 100% certain. If this was released by the Gov't, then this story is complete bull$%$. I have been working in Photoshop for almost 20 years, day after day, and it is obvious that this was pieced together. Besides the exact match when placed on top of one another, and the fact that every highlight and every shadow is identical, check the blur on the beard and compare to the scarf or whatever that is in the background. The scarf would more blurred than the beard, not sharper as it appears.

I think he was toast about 9 or more years ago, and they didn't want to admit it because then we would have to go home. And the whole water story smells like low tide.

Gee,I wonder what this did for O's ratings.....



new topics

top topics



 
103
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join