It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Will Osama's capture end the 9/11 theories?

page: 1
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:43 AM
link   
does this prove he is guilty?

what do you think?



Mod Note: Starting A New Thread

Mod Note (This Appears On Every New Thread/Post Reply Page):
Please make sure every post matters.
Refrain from 1-line or very-minimal responses.
Edit-down your quoted posts to the important part.
Don't use "txting" shorthand in posts.
Use snippets and links for external content.
Provide meaningful comments for links, pictures, and videos.



edit on 2/5/11 by argentus because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:47 AM
link   
Unless he wrote a letter confessing and slapped it on his chest before he died, then his death doesn't prove anything.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:48 AM
link   
At the time I'm writing this, I think your post should be more than two lines.

Second.

~Namaste



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:48 AM
link   
He wasn't even wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks.
2nd.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:48 AM
link   
reply to post by descartes90
 


"Will Osama's capture end the 9/11 theories?"
Why would it?

"does this prove he is guilty?"
How so?

"what do you think?"
You first.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by descartes90
does this prove he is guilty?

what do you think?


Innocent people have been executed in prisons.
Does that prove they are guilty?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by superman2012
He wasn't even wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks.
2nd.


Osama is irrelevant to physics.

If a single airliner could not obliterate a building 2000 times its mass then who was flying it is totally irrelevant.

psik



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:56 AM
link   
reply to post by descartes90
 


It's very convienient that he was killed before capture dont you think??

It doesnt prove anything really, it just proves that the US has been hunting him and they got him.



Although it seems strange he was killed in the fight, why not try everything possible to capture him alive? The news reports have been saying ' there was a firefight and after he was killed and they took possesion of his body''


Why not try to capture him alive and put him to trial?



edit on 2-5-2011 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 12:59 AM
link   
Nah the OS is what is in question really.

It's obvious it wasn't BIn Laden and his crew, unless he managed to convince the US government to help cover up the obvious controlled demolitions.
edit on 5/2/2011 by ANOK because: some animals are more equal than others



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by descartes90
 


It's very convienient that he was killed before capture dont you think??

It doesnt prove anything really, it just proves that the US has been hunting him and they got him.



Although it seems strange he was killed in the fight, why not try everything possible to capture him alive? The news reports have been saying ' there was a firefight and after he was killed and they took possesion of his body''


Why not try to capture him alive and put him to trial?



edit on 2-5-2011 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)



My thoughts exactly. Would it have been so difficult to capture him knowing the amount of intelligence they had? (a week ago by some accounts) I'm sure the victims family's of 9/11 would have loved to see him hang like Saddam Hussein. Seems a bit convenient to me in amongst all this birth certificate controversy.



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:04 AM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 


OS?


I came across this twitter feed in another thread from someone nearby the incident in Pakistan, you should have a read - go through back to about 8 hrs ago -

Twitter Feed



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:06 AM
link   
reply to post by walltofloor
 


yeah it's strange, we had this discussion in the main Osama thread but that is moving to fast to talk properly.

What about the supposed DNA test?

The claim the confirmed his ID by DNA. Now i dont argue the fact a DNA test can be done that quick in this type of situation, but my question is; how did they have his DNA on file to compare it?

They either needed his, his parents or siblings DNA???



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by ANOK
 


OS?


Official story, the NIST report etc...

What has the incident in Pakistan got to do with that?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:10 AM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 


oh ok yup.


Well Pakistan is where he was killed apparently, and the incident on the Twitter feed is talking about bombs, helicopter crashes etc from someone living nearby the incident.

If you read through it, you can see it unfold.


It starts 8-10 hours ago with a bomb blast a helicopter crash and other things. There is rumour and reportts of a training excersize untill the White house announces they had Bin Laden.


The Twitter feed is from someone living near where he was supposedly killed.
edit on 2-5-2011 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Havick007
 


Don't forget the Bin Laden's and the Bush's go way back. They were once literally in each others pockets. I have to admit i haven't heard of the DNA test, thanks for that. I thought they took weeks to process?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Havick007
 


OK thanx I'll give it a look, sounds interesting....



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:30 AM
link   
reply to post by walltofloor
 


oh yeah i remember after watching farenheit 911 i was shocked that the only flights leaving the US after the attacks were Bin Ladens family...



Yeah that was in the press release, that they had confirmed his ID via a DNA test.

No they can be done fairly quickly now, although a hospital or even police will take time because of back logs or red tape / paperwork etc.

It can be done very quickly nowadays.



Still though i find it hard to beleive they had previous DNA on file?



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 01:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Havick007
 


Yeah, couldn't believe that when i heard it either. The whole thing stinks if you ask me. I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens now in the coming months. Surely there's no reason for our troops to be over there now though eh? Yeah right.....as if thats going to happen anytime soon.
Thnx for the DNA info



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 02:10 AM
link   
reply to post by walltofloor
 


lmao it's funny you mention that, even though they got Bin Laden the administration still thinks there is more to be done in Afghanistan....


Here are some quotes from Obama in regard to the capture/killing and Afghanistan;







Bigpond News

 


Osama bin Laden killed in Pakistan

Monday, May 02, 2011 » 03:27pm



Al-Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden has been killed in a US operation in Pakistan, President Barack Obama has announced.
Bin Laden was killed in a mansion outside the capital of Islamabad nearly 10 years after the September 11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon killed more than 3000 people.



'Yet his death does not mark the end of our effort.'

'There is no doubt that al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us'.

'We must and will remain vigilant at home and abroad.'

Obama reaffirmed that the US was not at war with Islam.

'I've made clear just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11 that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a muslim leader, he was mass murderer of Muslims.'

'So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.'

Obama said cooperation with Pakistan had helped lead the US to bin Laden.Obama said the United States people understood the cost of war, but would not stand by if threatened.

'As a country we will never tolerate our security being threatened nor stand idly by when our people have been killed,' he said.

'We will be relentless in defence of our citizens and our friends and allies.'





They are not finished in Afganistan at all.....





edit on 2-5-2011 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2011 @ 03:04 AM
link   
What amazes me is that all the news and even Obama himself seem to talk about it like they targeted Bin Laden as an assination not a capture mission.

They say Bin Laden fired back and that he was shot in the head and that his son was also killed in the attack.

Still though it was like a targeted attack to killl him not capture him



The 6PM news is reporting it here now, and the US corresponant first said the strike was to kill him.

It seems strange, why did they set out to kill him and not capture him?




top topics



 
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join