Osama Bin Laden Killed in U.S. Raid

Originally posted by naraku
reply to post by Darth_Prime

 

Responsible for the 9/11 attacks

No He Wasn't...

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by SaturnFX

 

"they" "their" "them"

Your entire post is full of ridiculous generalities. I haven't been watching CNN or MSNBC on this, so I don't really know if "their" pro-Obama rhetoric requires "them" to accept the killing of Osama at face value.

edit on 2-5-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

Actually, I am overall cautiously optimistic that its real...but want to see the evidence overall before I commit to belief.

I am pretty straight forward with my angle on it...I don't have to go through mental gymnastics on how to justify my mind...and you know what...I am not freaking out about GWB or Boehner in the meantime

my mind is quite calm...and slightly amused.

sitting back watching how it unfolds

I can be comfortable in my stance in giving the benefit of the doubt, however wanting proof..because I know it will come out, else there will be a uproar..and they aren't that stupid.

Originally posted by Darth_Prime

Originally posted by naraku
reply to post by Darth_Prime

 

Responsible for the 9/11 attacks

No He Wasn't...

Who was?

Gah, disregard this.
I don't want to get involved in the 9/11 conspiracy theories stuff.

Originally posted by GhostLancer

Great observations. I agree. Mainly, why the ALMOST IMMEDIATE burial at sea?

From the Haditha (Sayings and teaching of Mohamed):
“Hurry up with the dead body (for its burial), for if it is pious, you are speeding it to goodness and if it is otherwise, you are laying an evil off your necks.”


By a speedy burial, we were showing respect to Islam. It's obviously in our best interests to respect Islamic customs rather than parade his carcass around for all to see.

Pro tip: We're trying to win good will with Muslims, hearts and minds, and all that.

Do you really think there is much to be gained by pissing all over Islamic tradition? Yes it would satiate you conspiracy theorists...okay who am I kidding, you guys would never accept the truth regardless of any images or photos released... But I don't think Obama is too worried about fringe internet nerds being upset that he hasn't met their standard of truth.

Osama Was Not Responsible For 9/11

Originally posted by Darth_Prime
Osama Was Not Responsible For 9/11

correct, the gregorian calender is
but he was responsible for the world trade center attacks, the many attacks on the us embassys around the world, the uss cole bombing, etc

reply to post by SaturnFX

Actually, I am overall cautiously optimistic that its real...but want to see the evidence overall before I commit to belief.

I would love to believe that they really got him and we can all move on from here. I'd love to see the real evidence and not just some pics of blood on a Persian rug, while his body has been cast to sea. There is nothing you can say, however, that would make me trust this POTUS.

...

he was not Responsible for the World Trade Center Attack on September 11th

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by SaturnFX

 

Actually, I am overall cautiously optimistic that its real...but want to see the evidence overall before I commit to belief.

I would love to believe that they really got him and we can all move on from here. I'd love to see the real evidence and not just some pics of blood on a Persian rug, while his body has been cast to sea.

aha, and there we can meet and shake hands/bury hatchet
you have your opinions on politics, I have mine, but at least we can agree that the beard being (potentially) dead is a good day no matter what.

Well...good day is an overstatement...closure is good for the soul..both facist/theocrat/corporatists and socialist/communist/secularists can agree

Originally posted by Darth_Prime
...

he was not Responsible for the World Trade Center Attack on September 11th

Dude, there are terms and conditions you agreed to to make quality posts..more than one line.

So, enough with this silliness...yes, you are a truther, got it..now move along, this thread isn't for you.

Originally posted by Tosskey

Originally posted by GhostLancer

Great observations. I agree. Mainly, why the ALMOST IMMEDIATE burial at sea?

From the Haditha (Sayings and teaching of Mohamed):
“Hurry up with the dead body (for its burial), for if it is pious, you are speeding it to goodness and if it is otherwise, you are laying an evil off your necks.”


By a speedy burial, we were showing respect to Islam. It's obviously in our best interests to respect Islamic customs rather than parade his carcass around for all to see.

Pro tip: We're trying to win good will with Muslims, hearts and minds, and all that.

Do you really think there is much to be gained by pissing all over Islamic tradition? Yes it would satiate you conspiracy theorists...okay who am I kidding, you guys would never accept the truth regardless of any images or photos released... But I don't think Obama is too worried about fringe internet nerds being upset that he hasn't met their standard of truth.

That is really very telling. If by some remote chance our POTUS is really a closet muslim then it makes all the more sense for him to martyr Osama and give him a speedy burial while taking credit for himself. I do not trust anything he does, and it's obvious the extremists have no problem with other members of their cult being matryred for the cause. on the other hand, if he really is just NWO front guy, then he can martyr Osama and still take credit for being the good guy.

Compare the not-so-speedy trial of Saddam and the oh-so-speedy burial at sea for Osama the martyr. (hint:even Sunni didn't like saddam much).

Originally posted by Threadfall
For people who dispute that Osama is dead, I have one question: "What about Fox News?"
I mean you can't believe that mass media outlets are complicit in doing their handler's bidding and not wonder why Fox News, the most anti Obama mainstream right wing media conduit out there, is just letting Obama 'get away with it'?

In fact they are confirming it too. There are too many disparate parts saying the same thing. Osama is dead! But I'll concede not all details are known, nor will they ever be

edit on 2-5-2011 by Threadfall because: grammar

Are you serious? Fox News presents the other side of the coin on most issues, in order to keep us polarized and make it seem that we have a choice in this two-party tyranny. But when it comes to the big stuff like this, 9/11, and the erosion of our civil liberties, they're entirely complicit

Originally posted by Darth_Prime
If you believe the governments variations to this tale... then you must believe the FBI when they said there are no ties with Osama and 9/11

Yeah the FBI said there was no connections between Osama and 9/11.

Oh wait...

From Dale Watson, the Executive Assistant Director of the FBI over counterterrorism and counterintelligence:

The evidence linking Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden to the attacks of September 11 is clear and irrefutable.

reply to post by Darth_Prime


That Is a bold statement

Please provide your facts and evidence supporting your claim

Originally posted by bacci0909

Originally posted by Threadfall
For people who dispute that Osama is dead, I have one question: "What about Fox News?"
I mean you can't believe that mass media outlets are complicit in doing their handler's bidding and not wonder why Fox News, the most anti Obama mainstream right wing media conduit out there, is just letting Obama 'get away with it'?

In fact they are confirming it too. There are too many disparate parts saying the same thing. Osama is dead! But I'll concede not all details are known, nor will they ever be

edit on 2-5-2011 by Threadfall because: grammar

Are you serious? Fox News presents the other side of the coin on most issues, in order to keep us polarized and make it seem that we have a choice in this two-party tyranny. But when it comes to the big stuff like this, 9/11, and the erosion of our civil liberties, they're entirely complicit

I would agree with you on this. I mean, the Saudis do actually have some financial interest in Fox.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
That is really very telling. If by some remote chance our POTUS is really a closet muslim then it makes all the more sense for him to martyr Osama and give him a speedy burial while taking credit for himself. I do not trust anything he does, and it's obvious the extremists have no problem with other members of their cult being matryrd for the cause.

Actually, burial at sea was one way to ensure he DID NOT receive a martyr's burial.

They even washed his corpse, which is NOT supposed to be done for martyrs.

The whole they got Osama show was just that a big show with many actors. If people think this is going to make things better, than they are dreamers.
All the sleep walkers need to wake up, there's a cliff in front of them, and their going to go over that cliff if they don't wake up.
The view looks pretty hopeless at the moment, I don't think it's going to improve anytime soon. Too bad.

reply to post by Tosskey

Actually, burial at sea was one way to ensure he DID NOT receive a martyr's burial.

Well, I see what you mean, being he will not be given a shrine for his worshipers. But it appears that burial at sea is also speedy. Where else would they bury him? I am guessing it was faster than bringing him back to the States, and safer than taking him to those nearby mountains. I heard the Saudis didn't want the body.

From the fbi website:
Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world

Notice they don't mention 9/11

Originally posted by naraku
reply to post by Darth_Prime

 

That Is a bold statement

Please provide your facts and evidence supporting your claim

That Osama wasn't responsible for the Attacks on the Trade Center?

and you have facts and evidence to support your claim?

when was he ever proven guilty?