posted on May, 1 2011 @ 09:04 PM
Heres a direct link to the video that was previously posted.
I remember this one, and I'm pretty much 100% convinced it's a hoax. Why? Because the damage that isn't present.
First, I noticed that there isn't any debris from the UFO. I realized this could be explained by unmalleable, indestructible alien alloys though.
Second, I noticed that there is no crater or disruption in the surrounding soil. Something that was able to imbed itself in the ground five feet or so
would generally cause a bit more, sorry, a LOT more disturbance to the imbedded area. I suppose this could be explained by soft soil, or mud.
What I finally realized, which make the aforementioned factors irrelevant, is that there is no damage to the trees. At the very start of the video you
can see how tall these trees are. I estimated about sixty feet, easily fifty feet though. If you look at the trees near the UFO, there is absolutely
no damage. At the angle the UFO is imbedded (60-70 degrees) and the distance it is from the trees (10-15 ft), the highest point it could've hit these
trees at is around the 40 ft mark, at least breaking the tops off. The fact that there is no damage at all is irrefutable proof that this UFO could
not have traveled through the trajectory that the evidence stipulates it does.
As I said, I'm not 100% convinced because there are always situations that the evidence can't account for, but in terms of the evidence that's
present, I'm convinced it's fake.