In the book "Conversations with Nostradamus" by Dolores Cannon (vol 2) 1990, we find a few bits of an interesting discussion.
Normally, regression has been used in order to be able to 'communicate' with the past, but in this section 'progression' is used and we find
ourselves apparently having a conversation with someone who is in the year 2087 and on there way to a system somewhere way out at Sirius...
The conversation goes on about how there are not so many Humans left on Earth, how the land mass has drastically reduced, the pole caps have melted
and a 300 square mile radius zone has been evacuated due to a nuclear meltdown.
Also, there is a 'one world government'.
Some of these things would not take a rocket scientist to work out as part of a 'story' from the future.. but what could be considered striking is
this nuclear accident.. Are they talking about Japan and the Fukushima reactors?
Has the pole shift begun (or as a part of it) with the recent earthquake there?
She says as a result of a tragic nuclear accident,one huge area in what was Asia- she calls it the Asian island- has no land that can be used. She
says,"We've been thinking of flooding this area,but we know it would poison the ocean."She says it's 300 square miles of "radioactive city." No
one lives in this area except people who don't want to change or who want to go back to the old system. As a result there are some types of mutations
that take place among their births.She's showing me the area ...it's somewhere in Asia.
D:What caused this nuclear accident?
J:It happened during the shift. It wasn't a nuclear war,
but an accident.
When the Earth shifted, it broke up an atomic reactor.It went almost completely down into the core before it calmed down. As a result, it poisoned the
whole area.
D:I thought it might have been something that happened before the shift.
J:No.In her sense of history there was no nuclear war. She says the threat was always there,but it didn't happen.
www.scribd.com...
The actual date for the shift and the nuclear accident is given as around 2029, but I cannot help but wonder if there is more to the Fukushima
accident than we are being told.
Yet some other things mentioned do seem to be very close to the now, rather than later..
Either way, it is an interesting read, no matter your point of view...
i like the idea of progression instead of regression.. if the past is linked with now, then why can't the future be linked to now also?