It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TiredofControlFreaks
Personally, speaking as a woman - I would gladly give my place to a couple of kids. But as an older woman who has already lived, given birth and seen my grandchildren into the world, I would also give my place to a younger man.
This isn't about manners or chivalry - I have given life and would die to preserve it! That is my birthright as a woman. It is the choice I claim for myself.
So thank you guys - I love love love you all for your gallantry - but you serve my purposes and values best if you survive to bring children into the world. Love them and protect them as men are meant to do.
TIRED OF CONTROL FREAKS
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
As you probably know, there are some controversial rules around. One of the most controversial ones, and probably one of the most pervasive, is definitely the ''women and children first'' rule. What do you think about it? Do you think this rule is sensible or has become a nuisance, something no longer viable in modern society?
Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
reply to post by inanna1234
so then...if you're capable enough to attack a grown man...why are you not capable enough to fend for yourself? by your statement you obviously feel as though you can not only equal a man's might, but also defeat it.
again people...women only scream equality when it suits their purpose. this, of course, is a blanket statement that will offend some, but there are plenty of women who will also agree that women turn the equality switch on and off at their discretion. so yeah...if you think you can mustar up enough testosterone to take me down...well then my fair lady...you can mustar up enough testoerone to swim.
thanks for keeping my spot warm, though.
Originally posted by Stratus9
Women - because they bear the next generation.