It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AngryOne
Note that ethnic pride doesn't count; I am speaking of racial pride - they're two different things. And as for response "It's because White Pride is racist" - nonsense. There is good and bad in every movement; in case you didn't know, Black Pride is no exception.....yet nobody has a problem with Black Pride. Why's that?
Basically what I'm asking is this: Where is White History Month? Oh, would that be too racist?
Originally posted by daskakik
How convenient to exclude ethnic celebrations. Of course you don't want to include them because they blow your proposition out of the water.
White History month doesn't exist because most of the history classes already focus on white history. It doesn't exist because it would be redundant.
The problem with White Pride is that the term was highjacked by racist groups. The words themselves have nothing wrong with them but the association with white supremisists groups does exist. Blame them. Also many do have a problem with Black Pride even some blacks when they specifically mean hate groups like the Nation of Islam and the Balck Panthers for the same reason.edit on 13-5-2011 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by tom502
Completely untrue. Who owns the media? The fact is that it's corporations and corporations don't have a race. Many of these are publicly traded so the owners are shareholders.
So who runs them? Well of the top of my head Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner pop up as two important players in the media that are white and I'm sure the board of directors of many of these corps. include many people that are white.
Originally posted by JR MacBeth
It's pretty well known that Jews run the "show" so-to-speak, when it comes to entertainment, and the media.
You can probably call them "white", but that might not help much. Neither does invoking modern corporate ownership. We still have to look to "who" is at the controls.
The fact is, Jews don't consider themselves merely "white". Their own writings confirm what anyone should recognize as a very "supremacist" attitude. They're literally "above" white, in the mindset I'm talking about.
Of course, not all Jews feel that way, but most seem to, by all appearances, based on articles from their publications, things issued for their own consumption.
Something to factor in to the discussion maybe.
Originally posted by inforeal
reply to post by AngryOne
Your premise is absurd and a lot of your statements in your op are false.
First, white people control the media. Do you think they want to destroy themselves?
Black people are often labeled as criminals in the media, that’s why a racist like PANDA X is deceived that all blacks are criminals. He gets that from the way the WHITE media portrays blacks.
There are many movies that have racist blacks in them. Check out the TV movie of 12 Angry Men.
The reason 98 percent of villains are white males is because in movies about 98 percent of the actors are white.
Up until very recently just about all of serial killers were white. Just recently more blacks have become serial killers. Though the vast majority of serial killers are still white.
And as for history, well they rarely teach in schools anything but white history therefore we learn practically only white history whether its them doing good or bad.
Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by daskakik
In postmodernism it's not what you look like, it's how you identify.
I could find pics of people accepted as Native American, Hispanic or Black in the US, and they look white.
Now that there's casinos, and cash to be made from affirmative action a lot of people bring out their one-eighth baggage. So identity often follows the cash.
Those photos are selective, but ultimately the Jews choose to call themselves "Semites".
So I suppose one should take it up with them - why should it be up to whites to say: this is a Jew, and this is not a Jew?
Actually already mentioned earlier in the thread.
Jewish isn't a race. They may consider themselves above the rest but many are still white so I don't see how they stand to gain from demeaning the white race as the OP proposes.
I think I gave 2 good examples of "who" is at the controls that are white male christians.