posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 11:17 AM
reply to post by Ahabstar
Yeah that was one of my suggestions in another thread. To view any person illegally entering the country while in possession of a fire arm should be
viewed as an armed incursion. Designating that though would allow the shoot first and ask questions later situation.
Im alos in favor of making the entire southern border a military training free fire zone. They might think twice about crossing when the order of come
left 5 degrees and fire for effect is given to the military.
As a side note, and no offense intended at all. Not all 10 amendments are applied to the people.
The 4th amendment, protection against search and seizure, applies to the Government and not the people. If you search someone for no reason, its an
assault. If Law enforcement does it, its an illegal search, a violation of the 4th as well as 42 USC 1983.
The 7th amendment, which is a guarantee of trial by jury in some civil cases, has never been incoroperated and applied to the States.
Either or, SCOTUS ruled the Government can regulate the sale and manufacturing of weapons. I just see this legislation, coupled with the ATF fiasco
and the attempt to restrict guns because of the Rep Giffords incident, as being ripe for abuse.
Its difficult to put pandora back in the box.