It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xavi1000
reply to post by gandhi
What security ? Why are you mixing things ? This law is good ... We have science and scientists which is their job to warn us if Nibiru,Elenin, or some other crap that will put us in the danger. Or you think every scientist is goverment cover up agent.Nobody can predict exact time , location and strentgh of quakes till now ,especially not some blogger who thinks he is a God and scaring ordinary people and messing up with their lifes.Just hit them in the pocket .
Originally posted by xavi1000
Finnaly fines for prophets and good law ..... just hit them in the pocket ...i hope this law will be implemented in US soon
Originally posted by Solsthime331
Originally posted by xavi1000
Finnaly fines for prophets and good law ..... just hit them in the pocket ...i hope this law will be implemented in US soon
it wont because too many people in the US believe in 2012. 99% of these pophets are considered "Crazy" or "Wrong". but as most people dont realise most psychic abilitys best hits *as an example im going to use names* are the first letter of a name not the whole name.
Originally posted by bluedrake
Originally posted by prof7
Originally posted by xavi1000
i hope this law will be implemented in US soon
free speech a bad thing for you? What other rights would you like to remove also?
Freedom of speech is not a bad thing and should not be taken away... but then again there are to many sheeple in this world to go around fear mongering. A line has to be drawn somewhere
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
reply to post by schuyler
I don't think that you can directly compare someone shouting ''fire'' in a crowded theatre with someone making a fake apocalyptic prophecy.
The idea that every single person who starts one of these threads should be fined - on the off-chance that some highly impressionable reader may take them to be truthful - is ludicrous.
Originally posted by schuyler
For example, if my spouse became enamored with your "teachings"..and as a result she killed herself, ...then I have grounds to sue you.
Or, if I'm not prone to court suits, I might just take you out, and that would be the basis of my defense.