It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
You're mistaken, which is not understandable why you'd be wrong about something so easy to Google. Gravitational acceleration on Earth is about 32.2 feet per second per second.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
If I.m not mistaken the free fall velocity on earth is 11 ft/sec.
Wonder if any1 has already done this with the film.
Originally posted by meeneecat
The documentary states that Nixon supposedly went to the director, Stanley Kubrick, who still had the set from "Space Odyssey" and asked to film a faked "moon landing". In the documentary, there are interviews with Kubricks wife which seems to confirm this. There is also a picture of the "moon landing set" (i.e. inside the studio) with a photograph of Kubrick laying on the ground.
Hi meeneecat, sorry to me a meanycat myself but you really fell for that one. Didn't you get suspicious when the guy said he was going to let his children play with the guys dead body? That's what gave it away for me, that they couldn't possibly be serious.
Originally posted by meeneecat
There's some more information on the theory here if you want to read about it...again I'm not claiming that this is, in fact what happened, but the documentary shows some very convincing evidence.
www.realitysandwich.com...
There's also a link here and a google video, I think the documentary that I saw was called "Dark Side of the Moon". I'd have to rewatch the video just to confirm, but I'm pretty sure this is the one:
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
You're mistaken, which is not understandable why you'd be wrong about something so easy to Google. Gravitational acceleration on Earth is about 32.2 feet per second per second.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
If I.m not mistaken the free fall velocity on earth is 11 ft/sec.
Wonder if any1 has already done this with the film.
Yes I do. But I'm not sure if you do. Earth has a gravitational acceleration. What makes you think objects falling in earth's gravity have a fixed velocity?
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
There you go again. Dont you know there is a difference between velocity and Accel.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Some objects can have a terminal velocity, but that varies widely with the shape and density of the object. That variation explains why the feather and hammer experiment performed on Earth yields different results where the hammer falls at a faster terminal velocity.
So it doesn't make any sense to talk about a universal velocity for falling objects on Earth, and where did you get 11 feet per second anyway?
Lol. Would make more sense if wiki is replaced by education I would imagine.
Why would the terminal velocity be any different for feather and steel ball if expt performed on earth in vacuum?edit on 29-4-2011 by Angelic Resurrection because: Typos
Originally posted by Pilgrum
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
It was dealt with in this thread based on that hammer & feather demonstration video.
Oh how we do miss JL
Your'e still not making any sense.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Why would the terminal velocity be any different for feather and steel ball if expt performed on earth in vacuum?
In fluid dynamics an object is moving at its terminal velocity if its speed is constant due to the restraining force exerted by the fluid through which it is moving.
That thread mentioned the same estimates I did. Estimated height about 4 feet high, and time a little over a second (the other thread says 1.2 seconds) which is about right for the moon.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
So wts the verdict in the thread you quote. Was it verified if the landings were real or faked.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'll add "terminal velocity" to the list of things you don't understand.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
[ quote]Your'e still not making any sense.
I'll add "terminal velocity" to the list of things you don't understand.
That's why we need to talk about acceleration
That thread mentioned the same estimates I did. Estimated height about 4 feet high, and time a little over a second (the other thread says 1.2 seconds) which is about right for the moon.