Swift Boat Veterans Oppose Kerry, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 29-7-2004 @ 05:54 PM by donguillermo
Originally posted by madmanacrosswater
Kerry had 13 members of his swift boat with him heading into Boston. Who is this joker.

It is probably Ralph Reed a Bush "strategist". Anyone see him last nite on CNN after Edward's speech? He was former head of the Christian Coalition and I now realize why he moved on. He is a born liar.


The driving force behind the Swift Boat Veterans is John O'Neill, a partisan Republican hack who has been dogging Kerry since Richard Nixon was President.

Here is some background from
Salon. You will have to get the free day pass to read the article.

Houston attorney John E. O'Neill, the Navy veteran who has emerged recently as a harsh and ubiquitous critic of John Kerry's military service, tells reporters that he has never really been interested in politics and isn't motivated by partisan interests. In the media, O'Neill is often described simply as a Vietnam vet still enraged by the antiwar speeches Kerry delivered more than 30 years ago. That was when O'Neill first came to public attention as a clean-cut, pro-war protégé of the Nixon White House's highest-ranking dirty trickster (aside from the late president himself), Charles Colson.

Now O'Neill has emerged from those decades of silence, roaring denunciations of the man who will become the Democratic nominee for president this summer. "I saw some war heroes," he told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday. "John Kerry is not a war hero."

To establish his nonpartisan credentials, O'Neill assured the CNN anchor that he was "never contacted" by the Bush-Cheney campaign. What he didn't mention, however, is that his law firm boasts long-standing and powerful connections with the Bush White House.


If you visit the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth website, you will see that John O'Neill is on the Steering Committee. You will also see that the group is a "tax exempt non-partisan public advocacy '527' organization." LOL. Non-partisan. Who do they think they are kidding?

I wonder if it is possible to find out where the money is coming from. It wouldn't surprise me at all if it is coming from the Bush-Cheney campaign or the Republican National Committee.


reply posted on 29-7-2004 @ 06:27 PM by ZeddicusZulZorander
Originally posted by donguillermo
Perhaps you can provide me with an example.


Sure.
The Tenth Brother from Time.com



Over the next three years Gardner served as gunner on four different Swift boats, each with a different commanding officer. His least favorite was his last: Lieutenant (j.g.) John F. Kerry of PCF-44. When describing Kerry he unloads choice adjectives, “opportunist” being his favorite. His most colorful phrase is claiming that all Kerry wanted to do was “save his lily-white ass.” Up until now he has kept his resentment mostly to himself. “I’ve told a few of my friends that he was an asshole,” Gardner says. “But I’m not looking to make news.”

No two men remember combat exactly the same way so Kerry has been extremely lucky that 9 out of his 10 crewmen have almost identical stories about his valor during various firefights and skirmishes. But memories can vary from person to person; Gardner insists that the Kerry he knew in Vietnam was a singularly un-heroic figure. He dismisses the glowing eyewitness accounts of his crewmates Jim Wasser (Radarman), Bill Zaladonis (Petty Officer), Drew Whitlow (Boatswain’s Mate) and Stephen Hatch (Boatswain’s Mate) as bunk. “Kerry sat some of them down and convinced them to buy into his side of what happened over there,” he explains in bizarrely conspiratorial fashion with no evidence to back him up. “When you’re as persuasive as Kerry it’s not hard to make a guy change something that he saw.”



reply posted on 29-7-2004 @ 08:21 PM by Seth Bullock
Off-topic rant

Originally posted by donguillermo
You are quite the Republican propagandist aren't you? Why don't you stop spamming ATS with Republican talking points?


You have got to be kidding me!?! The person that starts a thread on every anti-Bush article or website on the entire internet? ATS is not a site dedicated to removing Bush from office. Nor is it a site for liberals only. Yes ther are a lot of people here that do not like Bush, but there are some that feel differently and their opinion is just as valid as yours.

In another thread you accused me of posting only rhetorical BS. I'm sure to you it may seem that way, and perhaps there is some truth to that. Back in the old days, when I first came here (only three months ago, but the difference is startling) there were threads where issues were debated.

We debated taxes, gay marriage, abortion, school prayer. We talked about the differences in the parties, and the good and bad of both. Then, things changed. The political debates became just the same old Bush bashing arguements, one after another. I lost interest, started spending more time on the ring hunt (which paid off I guess) and the more "esoteric" threads because just tossing insults back and forth is not my idea of debate.

So yeah don, maybe my posts don't live up to your (or my) standards anymore. But I must say, the purely negative posts by yourself, and gmcnulty before you, are some of the reasons.

Off-topic rant over
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Dictator Is The Solution.
  Posted 2 days ago with 15 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 16 days ago with 5 member flags
So, is it really a female choice?
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags