posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 02:04 PM
Originally posted by lucysadvocate
it all looks very clear, and concise, there doesnt seem to be anything out of the ordinary with obama's birth certificate. not that I am a staunch
supporter of obama its just I dont see where all this hype stems from.
Nothing out of the ordinary? Well, reduce the brightness and increase the contrast in an image-editing program and THEN you will see things that
should not be there. Like:
1. different sized pixels in the background green sheet and in various words. That's impossible, if the document was scanned.
2. some words/characters are pixellated, some are not. This is impossible, and indicates that images have been added.
2. faint words (e.g., OAHU, SEX, Hour of birth, OBAMA) from the short form appear on the long form where they should be on the short form. But, a
block of illegible text appears in the "signature of attendant" box which is NOT in the short form, so bleeding of text through the paper during
scanning cannot be the cause.
3. characters and words appear on different layers. Moreover, they are bitmaps with no chromatic aberration around them, whereas all text that has
been scanned will show coloured fringes around it.
I could go on and on. But perhaps if you understood the technicalities of image-editing, you would understand that it is NOT hype but very serious
issues. They do say "ignorance is bliss".....