Obama's LFBC has CIA-61 handwritten on it - ATS Exclusive

This is getting as bad as the "symmetrical lines on his palms" thread

Originally posted by Hawking
This is getting as bad as the "symmetrical lines on his palms" thread

more bleed over deciphered

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c7160dd6cb78.jpg[/atsimg]

pointing to Immigration and Naturalization of the USA
April 22, 1964

Obama was 2 yrs old

could this be why there is a VOID on
Obama's Short Form ???

or am I just seeing things again that ain't there ???
lol

wow, and then there was silence.
must be an error huh ???

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by Hawking
This is getting as bad as the "symmetrical lines on his palms" thread

more bleed over deciphered

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c7160dd6cb78.jpg[/atsimg]

pointing to Immigration and Naturalization of the USA
April 22, 1964

Obama was 2 yrs old

could this be why there is a VOID on
Obama's Short Form ???

or am I just seeing things again that ain't there ???
lol

You still havent answered why you think the VOID would be so tiny. Tinier than the print of the document.

Originally posted by Furbs
You still havent answered why you think the VOID would
be so tiny. Tinier than the print of the document.

how the heck would I know ???
If it was an archive copy they voided,
then they probably thought it would never
be seen by the public so no need to make
it huge. Just guessing though.
Or like I said earlier, maybe it was
somebody's first day. Who knows ???
You're asking me to speculate on a decision
made by somebody else.

However, I do find it ironic that the VOID was
just over BARACK. So it may have something
to do with his name on the document. Maybe
a name change and they voided it for that
particular infraction. But it's a guess at present.

reply to post by boondock-saint


Hi Boon,

I have been following this thread from the beginning, s&f from you!

Well keep up the good work, I am sure this has them squirming.

I cant wait to see what else you uncover!

Originally posted by boondock-saint
or am I just seeing things again that ain't there ???
lol

I think that might be it. You didn't get the first level of bleed-through right, so I think your odds of getting subsequent levels right are not good. Your interpretations seems like a big stretch.

It's clear the short form was under the long form when photographed. If you look at the image of the short form provided in the same press handouts, you'll see more bleed-through:



You don't even need to mess with it to tell that the page under the short form is the correspondence sent to the Hawaii director of Health, requesting the certificate:



I think anything you're seeing is either misinterpreted bleed-through from those documents or digital noise.

if you are seriously attempting uncovering of a presidents BC fraud, then grasping at straws and making ATS look like clown school isn't the way.

This is a very good find boon..I always felt his birth certificate was a fraud ..keep up the good work but you know we will probley never find out the ultimate truth on this matter S&F

Originally posted by nataylor
I think anything you're seeing is either misinterpreted bleed-through
from those documents or digital noise.

while I do thank you for your time and attention
to detail in that post. I just do not concur with
your assessment. Mainly for 2 reasons.

1) Background noise making an exact replication
of VOID all in capital letters all by itself with no
surrounding noise and be directly wrapped
around existing text would be very highly
improbable. Plus, VOID is not hand written
on the press short form in the link you
provided, so you are comparing apples
to oranges.

2) The INUSA 22-4-64 revealed directly underneath
the date stamp is highly suspect due to it's location.
One date directly hand written below a stamped date
with no other noise surrounding it means there was
something written there. If it was all background noise,
we would see this type noise all over the document,
not just in key locations relevant to where key
information is in the document. It's where the noise
is located in relation to the other text on the page.

So with that, I have to disagree with your assessment.
But I do appreciate your time you spent looking into
this very strange anomaly. And I'll even give you a
star for your hard work

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
if you are seriously attempting uncovering of a presidents BC fraud, then grasping at straws and making ATS look like clown school isn't the way.

dude, ATS was the first to uncover this anomaly
and it's subsequent findings. I don't think that
makes ATS look like a clown. But a very well
tasked and competent team of researchers.

I think the communication breakdown is occuring because so far you are the only one that can see void. I can't see it and I don't remember anyone else commenting that they saw it. So you are trying to convince us of something we aren't able to see; Even though you originally stated in the thread that you have bad eye sight and remind us frequently of it.

You ask us if you are just seeing things, we say yes then you argue our reply. Do you really need anyone else in here or are you just entertaining yourself?

Originally posted by sputniksteve
I think the communication breakdown is occuring because so
far you are the only one that can see void.

ya know that is a wonderful idea.
I do need to take my computer in for
an annual eye exam. Dem pixels could
be going bad, lmao.

the picture is becoming clearer as to why the April 22, 1964 date
is relevant to the VOID on Obama's BC.

Obama's father was kicked from Harvard and told
to go back to Kenya near that same date.

Harvard had asked the Immigration and Naturalization Service to delay a request by Barack Hussein Obama Sr. to extend his stay in the U.S., "until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him," immigration official M.F. McKeon wrote in a June 1964 memo.

m.apnews.com...

and we have confirmation Obama Sr. was kicked out of Harvard
and went back to Kenya and the corresponding date on Obama's
BC which was hand written with INUSA, Immigration and Naturilization
of USA.

reply to post by boondock-saint


Interesting. So they voided Obamas birth certificate because his father got kicked out of Harvard? Im not entirely sure what the correlation is though. Also are you as certain about this as you were about CiA? Because that is what im gauging my belief on now. Your certainty.

Originally posted by sputniksteve
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

Interesting. So they voided Obamas birth certificate because his father got kicked out of Harvard? Im not entirely sure what the correlation is though. Also are you as certain about this as you were about CiA? Because that is what im gauging my belief on now. Your certainty.

I am just relaying the info as I find it. You are free
to believe what you want to believe.

But it appears from the article that Harvard had contacted
Immigration partly due to Sr's finances and having multiple
wives. If Sr already had a wife in Kenya, then his marriage to
Ann Dunham would have been void as well. Which may be the
reason why we can't find a marriage license between Sr and
Ann Dunham. So if his marriage was voided, then any child
from that union probably would have been voided as well.
It is no coincidence that this incident with Sr was at the same time
of the Obama Jr's void BC. He was basically kicked out of the
country as well as Harvard.

EDIT TO ADD: He may have lied on his Immigration
paperwork. They may have asked if he was married.
If he had stated he wasn't and this new info of his
previous marriage came to light, then Sr would have been
guilty of forging Immigration documents.

please note I am just pointing out the close proximity of the date
to Obama Sr being kicked out of Harvard and the US
and the date appearing on Obama's BC. they are within
2 months of each other.

reply to post by boondock-saint

I get no hits in google for INUSA..

To me it looks like the IN is larger than the USA..

So it reads IN usa...

one of 2 things to note:

either this was one of the biggest screwups
in US History

or

Either somebody is hanging Obama out to dry
intentionally

either way, it's not good for Obama Jr.

and makes him an illegitimate president
if his BC was voided due to his father's
immigration status and an illegal marriage
to Ann Dunham.

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

I get no hits in google for INUSA..
To me it looks like the IN is larger than the USA..
So it reads IN usa...

yes, ur correct
it is larger
but realize this was an internal document
not to be released to anyone. They could
have marked it any way they wished or according
to dept. protocols. I do not know how agency
names are supposed to appear on archived
documents. All I can say is the acronym for
what I found could point to Immigration and
Naturalization of the USA.

so basically they were writing it
for their eyes only and would know
what INusa meant.