It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Yeah, great another fascist. Cooperative programs are what will happen, with or without money. No one can take care of themselves. Women died by the scores in childbirth, lifesaving operations. No one should have to pay hundreds of thousands for treatments. Medical treatments for the rich sold as responsibility!!!!
The best countries in the world have good medical programs.
What a joke. He hates collectivity.
The trillions to the bankers and the wars are the problem. social spending is peanuts and the very reason for taxes. I support venus project grass roots run, no money, but not dog eat dog have and have not style, it would wed collectivity and freedom as things should be.edit on 28-4-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
Originally posted by skull_bones
I think he is 100% accurate.
However, he will never get elected by campaiging on making cuts to social programs like, SS, medicare, medicade, welfare, etc....
YES but he needs to let the people know, cause most seem to NOT understand, is that all he can do is get the House to propse these... and vote on them.
He needs to CLEARLY explain the alternate when these people "opt-out".
Originally posted by jam321
Ron Paul- Great man who uses a lot of common sense.
However, I have a big question about him running for President.
If Ron Paul can't get his fellow Congressmen and women to see the light, how will he make basically the same Congress see the light if he became president?
Originally posted by aravoth
Originally posted by Unity_99
Yeah, great another fascist. Cooperative programs are what will happen, with or without money. No one can take care of themselves. Women died by the scores in childbirth, lifesaving operations. No one should have to pay hundreds of thousands for treatments. Medical treatments for the rich sold as responsibility!!!!
The best countries in the world have good medical programs.
What a joke. He hates collectivity.
The trillions to the bankers and the wars are the problem. social spending is peanuts and the very reason for taxes. I support venus project grass roots run, no money, but not dog eat dog have and have not style, it would wed collectivity and freedom as things should be.edit on 28-4-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Like I said, some people can see the train, some people are running right into it, You are a perfect example of the latter.edit on 28-4-2011 by aravoth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by antonia
Correct. If I properly understood you, the statist/interventionists would prefer to go onward blindly, lobbying for programs that are nothing more than a burden on the taxpayer. Meanwhile, the proverbial " train " is headed straight for them, never fully realizing the consequences of their misdeeds.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by antonia
i understand what you saying, but the problem is, there is money.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
rollback bush tax cuts
bring troops home
reduce military budget by 50%
problem solved
Originally posted by sensible thought
Originally posted by SaturnFX
rollback bush tax cuts
bring troops home
reduce military budget by 50%
problem solved
I strongly agree with 2 out of 3.
End wars and reduce military budget. I am in the National Guard and by having a part time military for some parts of our military saves a ton. It just doesn't work well when you have a back door draft for a decade worth of wars.
Can't get on board with rolling back tax cuts. There is no proof it provides jobs and as a small buiz owner I can tell you that if the work is there you hire (reguardless if you as the owner make more money), if you pay less in taxes you buy stuff or travel. No creation. That idea is a bigger scam than the FED.
Originally posted by GodIsPissed
Of course the dollar is going down!Did you think they made the amero for nothing?
Why is it when they make cuts,it usually only effects the people struggling to make ends meet?
And I wouldn't call that angry lol.
Finally, the “amero” – a shared currency for the three nations. This component is the least likely of the three, as there is no reliable evidence that a unitary continental currency is on the horizon. However, a savvy conspiracy theorist might suggest that the NAFTA Superhighway is Step 1, the NAU Step 2, and the amero the third and final step of tri-national merger.
Thus, why should there be much evidence for the amero’s existence at this point? The term “amero” was coined (no pun intended) in 1999 by Canadian economist Herbert Grubel. Grubel did manage to interest then-Mexican President Vicente Fox in the idea but could get no traction in the U.S. or especially in his native Canada [source]. Thus, the amero is strictly theoretical…