It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White House Releases Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate

page: 22
104
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byteman
reply to post by wingsfan
 


You can keep your assumptions to yourself.

I'd still be arguing if he was a white president...oh wait, HE IS HALF WHITE.


If he wasn't of color or didn't have a muslim name, I really don't think this would happen. the right wing REALLY hates clinton, he is like the republican's arch nemesis, even more so then obama, and yet they didn't pull this with him. denying someone's identity and sense of nationalism/patriotism is the worse slander you can dish out, and unless you have proof, then keep you're assumptions to yourself.

but keep skirting the issues and watch how fast you guys are gonna get him re-elected. if yall put half the effort into drudging up all his blunders, borderline impeachable activities, and flip-flop policies, then we can get some goals accomplished.




posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Open a document that resembles the one we are being shown. Preferebly older and a little less readable. Open said doc in Adobe pro. Run the text recognition software built in adobe pro. save. go to file. open with illustrator. you now have layers.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blaine91555

Originally posted by theindependentjournal
It could be that forgeries take 2 years to be good ones.


This shows the problem here. Even though he has now released what everyone wanted, Birthers will now simply say it's a forgery as the massive number of stars your post is getting confirms.

I'm as anti-Obama as a person can get, but I'm not irrational. Trump clearly caused this and I suspect Trump is in fact working for Obama to get Obama elected. Playing the fool and pretending to be his opponent is a great way to do that. I think Trump is doing this to help Obama for whatever reasons he has. By pointing out the insanity of the Birthers, he is clearly helping Obama and I doubt that fact is lost on Trump. I think this whole thing is orchestrated and controlled by Obama's people.


But it is NOT what everyone wanted. It's not the original document but a photo of a computer printout. The information in it was provided by (presumably) Obama's mother and it is begging the question that she gave completely truthful information. As the baby was illegitimate, we cannot even be sure that it was Obama Sr's baby?!! Perhaps she lied about that! Perhaps she lied about where he was born, too?

This document is irrelevant, anyway, because Obama had to have given up his citizenship when he went to school in Indonesia, his school registration form saying he was of Indonesian nationality. He was ADOPTED and changed his legal name. He could no longer be an American citizen when he was adopted because he became Indonesian and that country did not permit dual citizenship. That means he was ineligible to become president. He was not even an American, let alone a natural-born American. That's why he studied as a FOREIGN STUDENT when he came to America.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by BuzzingOn
I would like to see some of the birth certificates of the babies who were born that same week at the same hospital for a comparison. I wonder if that is possible. Might help clarify the color and conditions of the paper along with the type face. The one being shown sure does look new in my opinion.


Got a reply for that, which others have also already said, but you're not going to be happy with the answer...



That is the birth certificates of 2 women born the day after Obama.

Why did I say you won't be happy about it? While it answers the important questions, it isn't cut and dry one way or another. It does have a few other new questions pop up. Most notably the paper, which you specifically mentioned. But this difference is actually easy to explain.

Despite what some people are thinking, this new birth certificate is NOT the one that was made when Obama was born. It is a certified copy of the original (completely legit, but technically not the actual original). This is why it is on new security paper and not just boring white paper. Why did they not release the actual literal original? It's part of a bound book.

Here is what happened (for those who are tearing apart the PDF, this answers that as well):

- They took the big bound book that has the original certificates in it.
- They put it on a photocopier/scanner (This is why the upper left corner looks the way it does. Book can't fit on the scanner flat when it is bound).
- They then printed that photocopy/scan onto the appropriate security paper, as legally required.
- Due to the age of the document, the scan wasn't perfect. So, they had to go through and do some manual touch-ups. This is why when people were shifting the PDF, they found layers and oddities on the certificate.


The biggest problem, really, is the touch-ups they do. Obviously that leaves them completely open for doubts and second-guessing, as we all are seeing.

I wanted to add that some people are seeing a black version of the twin's birth certificates. Don't read too much into that. That is because they are actually from an old photostat machine, which makes images as negatives, to be printed properly later.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byteman
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


AwakeinNM proved it's fake. So thanks for proving you haven't read the whole topic.


Actually, I was careful not to call it "fake." I called it a "construct." Does that make it fake? I don't really know. It cold be a construct from actual facts - or made up data. It does make it awfully damned suspicious, though. To me, anyway. Suspicious enough that the issue isn't dead yet.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by freakjive
 

This is a vicious circle and I will say again what I have said before elsewhere:

I would not care if he were born on a raft in the middle of an ocean on the Moon if he were a good President doing good things for our country and for me and mine. He has done nothing but brought more harm. Bush was bad news but Obama is a nightmare.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by grahag
 


Maybe you should learn to use google.
I'm surprised someone who can find ATS can't manage to do a search for...

Obama spend hide record



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byteman
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


AwakeinNM proved it's fake. So thanks for proving you haven't read the whole topic.


He did? I thought he merely worded his opinion?
It takes much more material than such before one can actually use the word "Proof"- Just like in a Cort of Law



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


and all the birthers are not even going to vote for him on election day and it appears their numbers are growing

i dont foresee this as a problem.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by oakwood54
reply to post by freakjive
 


I was born in 1954 and my birth certificate has an embossed state seal on it verifying it is a valid
document, i also believe it is a requirement for territories too even at that time. Until i see a certificate
with a state seal, it is not valid to me,,,maybe they couldn't find the state seal stamp for that time era?

I believe you are right on that point it does have to have a valid seal(embossed)could it be possible that maybe the state seal has changed since then?



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   
The document has layers. Therefore, it is a hoax. Proof here:
wireupdate.com...



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byteman
reply to post by bigbert81
 



I did answer your question. If you are not talking about legal status, which is what EVERYONE here is talking about, then you are just playing a childish semantic game.



Anyways...please refrain from wasting my time unless you are ready to drop the useless semantic game and ask your questions in a complete and non-ambiguous manner.


No, my question is meant to show you that this whole TOPIC is a waste of time, I'm not the culprit. The point is that it doesn't matter.

And YOU responded to me first, remember that.


If you cannot ask proper questions then that is your problem.


And if you cannot give proper answers to proper questions, then that its yours. I think I know why you refuse to answer the question...

BTW, you responded with a 'that is your problem' to another ATS member...you must be in a phase.



You asked a question in opposition of my statement that Obama's birth means he cannot be president. That means you are trying to get at your own point, a point in opposition to mine.

Since my point is that Obama is disqualified to be president, due to his status at birth. Your opposition can only be that his birth has no bearing on him being president.


Sorry, all I heard was 'blah blah blah, I assumed that last statement just like you said I did'. This quote actually goes to strengthen my point, so thank you.

BTW, you assumed wrong.



edit on 4/27/2011 by bigbert81 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2ndFUTURE

Originally posted by AwakeinNM

Wow.

Screen grab from my computer:



I just did it too, lol. I can move all the pieces around. This is terrible for them that they didn't do a better job forging it. Sloppy!


I as well can verify this. Why would this be a constructed document?



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by something wicked
 




"Alternate loyalties at birth"....... I'm sorry if I don't swallow such latent BS, what loyalties did you have at the point of birth, did you pop out with a flag in your hand?


Latent BS?
Oh look...someone found their word of the day calendar and is now just stringing words together without understanding them.

If you think it's already BS, then it isn't latent.

I'm not trying to run for president, so your question is just a childish personal attack. However, I'll be the adult and answer...even though I don't really need to.

I was born on an Air Force base overseas. My status is "US citizen born abroad", my father is a US citizen, my mother is a Natural Born US citizen. Pursuant to the Mccain decision, I would be qualified to run for president.



Please, the birther horse is dead, can you stop beating it please? It's getting painful to watch.


Is this the sound of desperation and defeat? Sure is...
You have no cogent points, so you are now just resorting to irrelevant opinions about it being a dead horse.

Your own inability to argue your case, that is the truly painful situation.



I'm afraid if you believe you represent American views, a country that became what it is through the healthy influx from many countries, you are being insular and xenophobic, but go for it, it's your right.


You are trying to tell the child of a LEGAL immigrant about America's history of immigration.

I invite you to just stop now and save yourself the EPIC embarrassment you are in for.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:08 PM
link   
Have you wondered why he has a Kenyan birth certificate.
And now an American one was produced.

Two birth certificates for one man, which is real?
There is no need for him to keep it a secret if he wasn't born here in the United States.
You Obama supporters will stop at nothing to hide the truth.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:08 PM
link   
reply to post by spiritualzombie
 


They can push whatever issues they want.

My determination that Obama is a usurper is my own. Sure, I first learned of the issue from various sources (i am not all-knowing), but my final determination comes from looking at the US Constitution itself and making a common sense decision.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byteman
reply to post by grahag
 


Maybe you should learn to use google.
I'm surprised someone who can find ATS can't manage to do a search for...

Obama spend hide record


I found all kinds of articles stating that he spent it, but no proof. An article is not proof. It's hearsay unless someone actually involved was quoted and it was verified. I checked out 200 of those links and couldn't find a single page with proof regarding the claim. So, unless I'm missing something which your superior interweb skills have caught, your point is moot.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by wingsfan
 


Clinton got impeachment hearings for getting his hose drained. So, the racist card and the whole "it wouldn't happen to a white president" idea is ridiculous. If anything, Obama is getting more than a fair shake.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by freakjive
 



It's not a fake. These are OCR layers. This is what happens when you scan a document using text recognition software. These layers are created as a result. Any document you scan like this will come up with layers.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by cuthbert
 


I thought about that as well, but why would they go to the trouble? The image you attached of the two BCs looks a heck of a lot more convincing than the PDF frankencertificate.



new topics

top topics



 
104
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join