It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO mainstream news coverage MASS SIGHTINGS WORLDWIDE what is going on?!

page: 7
48
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 06:21 AM
link   
The case with the impressive light show- glowing object appearing to fall, then producing contrail, then light billows out...
is really the launch of the Soyuz 2 rocket...
HERE IS THE FULL, ORIGINAL VIDEO (1080p HD)


Here's another from an onlooker...

edit on 27-4-2011 by ltinycdancerg because: ETA




posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 06:38 AM
link   
Into the hoax bin.
As soon as I saw the Jerusalem video in it, knew that this wasn't well researched.
Better things to do than watch poorly researched stuff.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 06:45 AM
link   
Some people amaze me, especially comments like "the norway spiral was a a russian missile" do you fools really believe everything you read or see on the news? In this case especially as the Russians clearly stated that they didn´t launch a missile. Not only that, anyone with eyes in thier head can see that this spiral has nothing to do with any sort of missile.

The Jerusalem one is clearly a fake, you can see the dot move slightly when it stops at the bottom, re aligning the two videos.

Some might be od cloud formations and some are clearly birds or balloons, but you cannot paint all cases with the same brush.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 06:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Quickfix

Originally posted by Logical one

Yes the incident in LA in the forties is a documented event.........however there is no evidence to suggest that what the US military were firing at were ET driven craft.
Also I doubt very much that if these really were ET then only one "battle" took place.
Take the second world war..........there were hundreds of battles all over the world.

We get invaded by ET and we only have one battle .........highly highly highly unlikely.
Whatever they were firing at that night.......It probably wasn't ET.


It more then likely was ET. The craft was way beyond the technology at the time, and stills is in today's standards.

This is the type of howitzers most likely used. 105MM high explosive (HE) semi-fixed ammunition

en.wikipedia.org...

Like I said, people on the ground were killed because of the debris, you can look it up, and about 100K people witnessed this event.

It wasn't really a battle, it's just what the news papers called it....the ET's never fired back, they just watched, so that really isn't a battle, and who said ET invaded?

It was really just target practice, with many direct hits and not a scratch on the UFO...

And yeah battles all over the world, it was WW2, but those battles were not ET related...

I am sure there have been other ET battles, but this is not one of them, just a case where a UFO showed up over a city, the U.S. called it a weather balloon, which is a lie, and then it took off after being bombarded by the U.S. corporate military...still completely intact..

Then tell me IF it wasn't an ET related craft what was it? If it were anyone of the enemies at the time they would of fired back, not just watched...it wasn't project bluebeam as some would suggest, because holograms aren't solid, the shells would go through the hologram.

I patiently await your response.




Hi, No one - no one at the time said they saw anything 'ET like', in fact no one actually confirmed they had seen anything. Considering this was almost directly after Pearl Harbour, paranoia was rife and it is extremely likely that this was effectively 'war nerves' as attributed at the time, tied in with a loose weather balloon that may have sparked off the initial shots (not sure how you know this is a lie, but I'm guessing it's an opinion).

6 people died, 3 from anti aircraft fire and 3 from heart attacks presumably induced by shock/panic.

There were not over 100K witnesses, or at least not according to any contemporary information, I can't speak for any more recent ET biased revisionary retellings. Actual figures at the time stated around 2,000 were in the area, and as there was an air raid, many of these people had presumably done the sensible thing and sought shelter.

There is one known photo from the event - just one, and that actually shows searchlights and exploding shells, nothing more. I'm not sure how, given what is actually known, you can say this was definitely ET and that an object nobody saw and no witnesses even alluded to was there and well ahead of our time.

There is scores of information on this on the internet, usually divided into two camps - the facts and then the theorising which has no evidence for it whatsoever. Sorry, based on the actual facts at hand I put this down as an urban myth - you may choose to think otherwise, but you do so with no actual basis to your belief.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 07:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


I agree with you. I posted a video about those spirals on another thread from Lucus' www.rabitthole2.com

xo Suz



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 08:41 AM
link   
I think art Bell frantic caller one was so fascinating, as all the videos. You know it's cool we have skeptics I don't mind them at all. It's great we have the ability to question what we are seeing. I just find it amazing we still have un-explained things that no one can explain not even scientist. will they ever explain them? I'm not sure but this stuff is just fascinating.

I can bet many renowned scientist have UFO research as a secret hobby. it's just to interesting to pass up.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 08:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Colbomoose
Into the hoax bin.
As soon as I saw the Jerusalem video in it, knew that this wasn't well researched.
Better things to do than watch poorly researched stuff.


you seemed to have missed the point, It is actually a very well researched compilation of MSM reports of UFO sightings. Not too mention the freaky phone call thrown in at the end.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 09:05 AM
link   
I think it's pretty interesting that the massmedia more and more seems to write about UFO incidents and such, as someone said earlier; it almost feels as they are tryin to prepare us for something. And I think that more and more "normal people" are accepting the posibilities that we are not alone.

I think something is about to happen pretty soon (or atleast I hope so). But I have prolly been waitng biggest part of my life for proof of aliens

Somehow though, I got a feeling...soon we have the answers


Edit: that phonecall to Art was pretty cool
There is a lot going on that we don't know.


edit on 27-4-2011 by Azmodan85 because: Forgot about the phonecall



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by rydizz
I froze up when I heard the man on Art Bell show. You can hear the truth in his voice through the sobs.

Actually he called in a while later to admit it was a hoax and all just a gag.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 09:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Troofseeker
 


Bummer, but anyway, maybe that's what they wanted us to believe. Voice manipulation can't be that hard and if the call were true, i think they be pretty eager to cover it up nicely..



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 10:03 AM
link   
If you ever want to see a compelling compilation of UFO footage, this is it. The climax with the person calling in to the Art Bell show is made all the more compelling by the fact that the show's radio transmitter failed half way thru the call for the first time in the decades-long history of the show. They had to go to a back up system. And the information that the caller was giving was chilling indeed... We all sense that there is a period of great calamity and social confusion coming, and this may be the reason why.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 10:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Sky watcher
 


What you are feeling is fear. Why does the human race want to kill things they don`t understand?We will not survive very long if this is our reaction to the unknown------------ Chardonnay



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 11:47 AM
link   
www.youtube.com...
IMO it's not possible to hoax three different videos from 3 different angles. Looks real to me.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sky watcher
[Considering the same spirals have been found engraved in ancient hieroglyphs all over the world with art of people and animals fleeing them or dieing I would say its a Magnetic affect from Wormwood the Brown Dwarf star fast approaching our sun as it does every 3600 years.


This Wormwood?

i]"The third angel sounded his trumpet,
and a great star, blazing like a torch,
fell from the sky on a third of the rivers
and on the springs of water
- the name of the star is Wormwood."
Revelation 8:10-11


edit on 27/4/11 by NuclearPaul because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quickfix
And this "missile" made a perfect spiral, it may not be related to UFO's (like others said a projection perhaps since it is coming from the ground it seems), but it surely isn't a failed missile, the trail is all wrong once again, related to a rocket theory.


For sure the Norway spiral wasn't a rocket trace (rocket's emit smoke, not blue neon-beaming intelligent spirals that change formation like a hologramm), and it's gotta be one of the biggest mysteries out there. Some universal energy occurrence we're unaware of.



posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 08:29 PM
link   
reply to post by InnerPeace2012
 


"Another answer, media nowadays simply cannot tell the difference between a hoax and a genuine ufo footage..... Now that is far fetched for me... " -InnerPeace

Not for me. Not at all.

I'm firmly convinced that today's mainstream journalists wouldn't know their hat from a hole in the ground.




posted on Apr, 27 2011 @ 08:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by SlackOps
reply to post by InnerPeace2012
 


"Another answer, media nowadays simply cannot tell the difference between a hoax and a genuine ufo footage..... Now that is far fetched for me... " -InnerPeace

Not for me. Not at all.

I'm firmly convinced that today's mainstream journalists wouldn't know their hat from a hole in the ground.



You could be right though...

But what are odds of hiring nut case's in such media organizations...??? i sure this such, media organizations hire and fire, "The Apprentice" style.

Me thinks that's highly unlikely...

Peace



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Logical one

Hi, No one - no one at the time said they saw anything 'ET like', in fact no one actually confirmed they had seen anything. Considering this was almost directly after Pearl Harbour, paranoia was rife and it is extremely likely that this was effectively 'war nerves' as attributed at the time, tied in with a loose weather balloon that may have sparked off the initial shots (not sure how you know this is a lie, but I'm guessing it's an opinion).



I know nothing ET was seen, it is my own conclusion, since there was no technology at the time that could withstand the amount of shells fired at it, and it wasn't an enemy since no bombs were dropped.

This is the type of howitzers most likely used. 105MM high explosive (HE) semi-fixed ammunition

en.wikipedia.org...

And over 12,000 of the rounds were fired at the "weather balloon" as you label it, with direct hits, now I would think 105MM HE rounds would do enough for a dinky balloon ....

Use your noodle....





6 people died, 3 from anti aircraft fire and 3 from heart attacks presumably induced by shock/panic.

There were not over 100K witnesses, or at least not according to any contemporary information, I can't speak for any more recent ET biased revisionary retellings. Actual figures at the time stated around 2,000 were in the area, and as there was an air raid, many of these people had presumably done the sensible thing and sought shelter.


From the news recording from below, there were over a quarter of a million in LA at the time, that's 225K people.

And the HE round concussion (the shockwave) could be felt 15 miles away, I am sure it woke enough people up for them to look outside.

Where is that 2K number? Cause Last I heard LA was one of the most popular and crowded cities in the U.S.




Residents in a forty-mile arc along the coast watched from hills or rooftops as the play of guns and searchlights provided the first real drama of the war for citizens of the mainland.


Wow forty miles of houses, that sure is a lot of people from those houses that witnessed the event.

Sourced from below
en.wikipedia.org...





There is one known photo from the event - just one, and that actually shows searchlights and exploding shells, nothing more. I'm not sure how, given what is actually known, you can say this was definitely ET and that an object nobody saw and no witnesses even alluded to was there and well ahead of our time.



Exploding shells eh? Well that proves that it wasn't a photo now does it?


I can say it is definitely ET, since no tech. at the time could take a direct hit from a howitzer HE round and still be able to fly around....even the shrapnel which is the whole point of an exploding round, would of taken a balloon or other plane/vehicle down.

So please provide proof of another type of Air vehicle, because in the news report which I will post below, it was never shot down.





There is scores of information on this on the internet, usually divided into two camps - the facts and then the theorising which has no evidence for it whatsoever. Sorry, based on the actual facts at hand I put this down as an urban myth - you may choose to think otherwise, but you do so with no actual basis to your belief.


No, the facts I have are called physics..and you don't need to be Einstein to see them. You believe a story the U.S. Corp gives and you accept it as truth, haven't you seen todays world? Do you really think you can trust that corporation you so dearly hold onto?

I know that the object was not shot down, there were MANY witnesses, and the object dropped no bombs.

That information alone is enough for most people. I once again have to raise the question of technology, since when can howitzers bring down a Enemy military planes, but not a weather balloon....



There are videos like this all over youtube....put two and two together...
edit on 30-4-2011 by Quickfix because: to add quotes



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 01:41 AM
link   
So they're finally displaying all this hidden firework technology... It's about time... It only took me two visits to Vancouver’s “Festival of Lights” to become totally uninterested.



posted on Apr, 30 2011 @ 06:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Quickfix
 


How does exploding shells prove it wasn't a photo? I don't understand your logic, oh, there isn't any.

How does the lack of evidence that something was shot done 'prove' there was something to shoot down?

How does any of this say that there was an ET craft being shot at?

"No, the facts I have are called physics..and you don't need to be Einstein to see them. You believe a story the U.S. Corp gives and you accept it as truth, haven't you seen todays world? Do you really think you can trust that corporation you so dearly hold onto?

I know that the object was not shot down, there were MANY witnesses, and the object dropped no bombs.

That information alone is enough for most people. I once again have to raise the question of technology, since when can howitzers bring down a Enemy military planes, but not a weather balloon.... "

There may never have been a weather balloon, that is speculation as the actual reports show. They may indeed have been shooting at nothing - wouldn't be the first time one itchy trigger has started such an event, and I'm sure it won't be the last.

There were no witnesses that said they saw a craft. The only physics involved in this are that once shells are fired up, gravity means that unless they hit something, they will drop back down - please provide actual evidence.

Errrm, that youtube video - you know it's not actual film footage don't you? It's all manipulation and 're-imagining' based on the one photo - you did know that didn't you? You wonder why the clip gives no provenance for any moving images? lol, please don't let a lack of facts get in your way.

edit on 30-4-2011 by something wicked because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
48
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join