I did a massive amount of looking for over 2 hours earlier and if you look just to the west you will actually see something that resembles this quite a bit but more crude as it were. I thought it was something made, even saw an arrow to the southeast at the end of a natural formation and followed it to a giant crater. I thought to myself, what other way would i let them know where i've moved after crashing than using a natural formation to draw attention and make an arrow pointing to the location.

Don't get me wrong there could still have been something there but if there was and the crater is where they were located, well it is a crater now. If there was something there it is very likely that they were running when they crash landed and were "nuked" from orbit.

Why do people always think aliens should always look like us. Why do aliens have to have eyes, nose, ears, or limbs? Most importantly, why do humans think aliens must have a physical form. It's quite arrogant and ignorant to think so. That mountain is definitely natural, since why would aliens want to create an artificial mountain with the shape of a bald dude.

Arrogance. Think all forms of life should be created after us. We were late to the game.

Lesson here is, always work with the highest resolution image of something you suspect as artificial.
Once the hi-res version of this scene was posted, it is most certainly a depression, a crater albeit oddly shaped, and the similarity of it being the outline of a head is lost in the obvious.

It is the same kind of illusion as those low resolution smudged out massive "Towers" that have have been posted thousands of times. Any time you smudge something vertically on a landscape that has depth, it automatically puts the smudge in the foreground, making it appear that you are looking at a huge tower, dwarfing the landscape. These "towers" have no shadows, or evidence of smudged shadows anyway, which are further clues that they are not tall standing objects. True, they were smudged to hide something in the landscape, and that is interesting enough, but not tall towers.

There are a lot of great images of anomalous objects on Mars, but I do not believe these images belong in an unexplainable catagory.

Originally posted by ButterCookie

The statue appearing to be 'buddhist" could have some since of merit here; it was said that during the time of our 'creator' race of gods/aliens, they also had bases on Mars and it could be that the 'Martian' race is responsible for genetically engineering the Asian race (a seperate race for Africans, seperate race for Caucasians, etc.)

Thoughts?

Lol. Then the aliens had a sense of humour for shore.
But that face and slightly above and to the right look like female and male sexual organs.
The face itself could be of the anunaki.

Originally posted by AwesomeOverload
Why do people always think aliens should always look like us. Why do aliens have to have eyes, nose, ears, or limbs? Most importantly, why do humans think aliens must have a physical form. It's quite arrogant and ignorant to think so. That mountain is definitely natural, since why would aliens want to create an artificial mountain with the shape of a bald dude.

Arrogance. Think all forms of life should be created after us. We were late to the game.

Its not so much that they look like us,

its that we look like them. Gen 1:26 "Let US make mankind in OUR image, according to OUR likeness"

So no arrogance there.

the chance that there is life out there is either not or somewhere between not and vast according to the drake equation (which of course gets us nowhere). Even IF there is life other than us in the universe, the chance of it being close enough they would ever be able to travel here or in our local system smaller yet. The chance that they have evolved like us who use science of the visual and observable world, minuscule.

Another species on another planet may not have had a need for eyes, ears, maybe not even scent. It is arrogant as usual to think of any species on another planet being like us, but that is the way we are isn't it? So far our signals have reached about 100+ stars which is a molecule in a grain of sand on the beach compared to the vastness of space so the chance of our planet having contacted something even by accidental means is damn near non existent. I'd like to believe, but putting it simply, in my mind at least it is impossible.

Originally posted by j230ns
the chance that there is life out there is either not or somewhere between not and vast according to the drake equation (which of course gets us nowhere). Even IF there is life other than us in the universe, the chance of it being close enough they would ever be able to travel here or in our local system smaller yet. The chance that they have evolved like us who use science of the visual and observable world, minuscule.

Another species on another planet may not have had a need for eyes, ears, maybe not even scent. It is arrogant as usual to think of any species on another planet being like us, but that is the way we are isn't it? So far our signals have reached about 100+ stars which is a molecule in a grain of sand on the beach compared to the vastness of space so the chance of our planet having contacted something even by accidental means is damn near non existent. I'd like to believe, but putting it simply, in my mind at least it is impossible.

Totally arrogant.

And again, its not that we they look like us, we look like them (speaking of the humanoid-looking species that created us)...Please see my above post.