It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dakuma
A sleeper cell could not build a nuke within the USA - no chance of that. That however is not the same as a sleeper cell being in possession of the oft mentioned suitcase nuke.
Originally posted by TruthStrgnrThanFiction
i just hope there isnt another attack, its going to mess up the entire world big time , probably lead to ww III.
Originally posted by they see ALL
what the heck are you saying???
Originally posted by 27jd
...but it always seems that when it comes to being the "world police" the rest of the world despises us, but when help is truly needed, the world looks to us and says "so when are you gonna fix this?" Make up your minds world. Its just like the police here, we hate them when they give us tickets, but rely on them when we are in trouble and need help.
Originally posted by UKOK
Question 1, If a small to medium yield nuclear device were to explode in the center on New York you would probably be looking at a minumum of 500,000 deaths as a result of the initial blast and that number again from durns, radiation sickness etc.
Question 2, should this ever happen this event would go down in history as the biggest loss of life on the planet due to a single event.
Question 3, One million men, women and children are currently starving to death in Sudan. I do not see Mr Bush or Mr Blair looking too concerned about these people! just one percent of Americas defence budget would save these people from starvation and death! People should start to look at the real suffering in this world and not be too concerned about what might happen one day.
One last thought . One nuke = 1 million dead
One famine = 1 million dead
Whats the difference?