It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NSA releases UFO documents online. We are not alone!

page: 5
82
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by AcesAndNates
reply to post by Flyinghaggis
 



Good Lord! They need better scanners at the NSA/DIA/CIA. Note, white space added for readability:

At 2200 Z AUG[?] 15 observed [sic] bright white light appearing at bearing 026 (true north) elevation approximately [sic] 15 degrees.

Position [sic] of Muller [funnier if it had been Mulder] 23.17N 82.19W.

During the first minute [sic] of observation the light was pulsating or fluctuating in brightness at approximately [sic] one second intervals.

For the next two minutes of observation the light began pulsating concentric rings of light which flowed from the central source in a rippling shimmering fashion diminishing in brightness as they grew [?] further and further away from the originating source.

During the fourth minute [sic] of observation a bluish-green beam of light appeared from the central core of the configuration, extending outboard and downward to the left at an angle of approach [sic] 45 degrees, and reaching to the fade out point of the radiating rings of light.

Approximately [sic] five minutes [sic] after the appearance of the bluish-green beam (similar in appearance to a searchlight beam), the radiating circles of light disappeared leaving only the original [unintelligible] core of light and t[unintelligible]ored beam.

Following the disappearance of the circles, the beam seemed to retract towards the central core, growing broader and stouter as it retracted.
Finally, the beam and core seemed to form in a nebulous cloud-shaped mass, which drifted south on the wind, fading from view after approximately [sic] 14 minutes [sic].



During this event, the following atmospheric data was accumulated:

Barometer 29.91
Temperature - 83 degrees dry / 78 degrees wet
Visibility Excellent
four tenths cloud cover (stratus and cumulus)
Wind EX N.S. At 12 KTS [knots]
Electrical storm forming over immediate area of city of Hava [?]

This document declassified by COMNAVSECGRU on April 30, 1979


This reads as the Norwegian spiral !









posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 04:38 AM
link   

Recently a series of radio messages was heard coming from outer space. The transmission was not continuous but was cut by pauses into pieces which could be taken as units, for they were repeated over and over again. The pauses show here as punctuation. The various combinations have been represented by letters of the alphabet, so that the messages can be written down. Each message except the first is given here only once. The serial number of the message has been supplied for each reference. 1 . ABCDEFGHJKLMNOPQRSTUV ABCDEFCHJKLMNOPQRSTUV ABCDEFGHJKLMNOPQR etc. 2. AA. B;AAA.C; AAAA.D; AAAAA.E; AAAAAA.F; AAAAAAA.G. 3. LAA; LBB. LCC; LDD; LEE; LFF; LGG. 4. LBKAA; LCKBA; LCKAB; LDKCA; LDKBB; LDKAC; LEKDA; LEKCB; LEKBC; LEKAD; LFKEA; LFKDB; LFKCC; LFKBD; LFKAE. 5. LFKAKBC; LFKCKBA; LGKAKBD; LGKCKAC; LKAKBCKKABC. 6. LAllBA; LBYCA; LAMCB; LCllDA; LBIIDB; LAMDC; LDMEA; LCMEB; LBMEC; LAMED. 7. LNIIAA; LNYBB; LNMCC; LNIIDD; LNIIEE; LNYFF; LNMGG. 8. LAOAA; LNONA; LBOAB; LBOBA; LNONB; LNOBN; LDOBB; LDOAD; LFOAF; LFOBC. 9. LFOAOBC; LFOCOBA; LFOBOCA; LODOEFOODEF. 10. LDRBB; LBRBA; LARBN; LCRCA; LARCN. 11 . LRBCKDD; LRBCKAG; LRBCOBD; LRBBD. 12. LRCBKDE; LRCBOCC. 13. WRBC; WKAG; LKJAOCC; LKJARCB. 14. LBPJD; LDPJB; LAPCC; LCPFB. ! 117 EXTRATERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE UAB; UBC; UCD; UEJ; UFJ; UGJ; URBCRCB. QLNA; QLAC; QLAKAA; QLNOAA; QLRBBB; QUBB; QHLAALAB; QQLCC; QUJG. SLAA; SUAB; SLBKAA; SLAOAA; SLNIIAA; SHLFOAFLAPFF; SHLAALBB. LATA; LBTKATA; LETKBTCT; LF"I'OCTBT; LGTG; LANTJ. LABCTKOARJBKOBRJAC; LCBATKOCRJBKOBRJAOARJN; LDEFGTKKODRJCOERJBKOFRJAOGRJN; IILJKAAVLGAV ; HLAATRCAVLBAV; HLCAVLAATRAVB; IlLEAVLFKAAV; HLCKACOVLBGOV; HLFOBSOVLCSOV; HLCDOVLAATRDOVB; SLKAVPVKPVAV; SLOAVPVOPVAV; SLKAVKPVTVKKAVPVTV; SLOAVOPVSVOOAVPVSV: HQLAVBVQLllAVBVllBVAV; HQLAVBVQLRAVBVRBVAV; 21 . HLNKBIIRDDDVBODDDVCUVLADDDVLBDDDV; HlNLADVLIINADVLARDVB; IlUVLABVLNBVLNIIBVRBVB; SUVLAVBVQLAVBV; SUVUAVBVUBVAV. 22. QTVUAVBVUBVAV; QTVLAVBVQLAVBV; trrVLRAVBDUNAVLAVB ; HQUAVBWVUBVAVLBVAV: SHQTVGVHVUVQGVQIIV; SHQUVGVHVTVQGVQIIV ; U1VAVUVBVCVUVUVAVBVCV; LTVAVTVBVCVTVTVAVBVCV; LTVAVUVBVCVUVTVAVBVTVAVCV; LUVAVTVBVCVTVUVAVBVUVAVCV. 23. JNVUVBAVCAVBAV; JIlYBAVTVBAVCAV; JNVUVBAVCAVTVBAVCAV; HJIlYBAVCAVLBAVUVBAVCAV; HJIlYBAVCAVLCAVTYBAVCAV; HTVJIlYBAVCAVJNVCAVBAVLBAVCAV; HJNVBAVCAVJNVQCAVQBAV; SHTVJNVBAVCAVJNVCAVDAVJNVBAVDAV. 24. NKVAJAV: HKVBJAV; NKVCJAV: NXVDJAV; NXVEJAV: IIKVFJAV; NKVGJAV; NKVAATJAV; NKVABTJAV; HIlKVAVJAVNKYKAVAJAV. 25. NKYTVABJAV; NKYTVTVABCJAV: NKYTVADTAGTJAV; NKYTVTVGGTAIlIITANATJAV; HTVJNVAVNIIVJNVBVNIIVJNVTVAVBVNIIV : NKYNJAV; NKVJJAV: NKVRJBJAV; NKVRJCJAV; NKVRJDJAV; NKVRJJJAV; NKVRJANTJAV; NKVRJAIlIITJAV ; NKVRJANHIITJAV: HIlKVBVJAYHKVRJBVJAV; HIlKVTVBVCVJAVJlKVKBVCVJAV HIlKVTVBVCVJAVHKVOBVCVJAV HIlKVTVBVCVJAVNKYRBVCVJAV QNKVPABJAV; QNKVJIABJAV; QNKVIINCJAV : QNKVPGFJAV. 26. NKVJAVJOV; NKVIIIlAJOl/ : HNKVKNBVJAVNKVBVJOV; NKVPABJOV; HIlKVTVAVBVJOVNKVIIAVBVJOV; HTVNKYTVAVB.YJOVQLNBVNKYPAVBVJOV; QNKVPANJAV; QNKVPANJOV; SLOPAVBVPCVDVPOAVCVOBVDV: SHUOAVDVOBVCVUPAVBVPACVDV.QLOBVDYH; HIlKVAVJAVIlIIMAAV; er. HTYHAVBVHBVAYHVAVBV; HHVAVBVTYHAVBVHBVAV; HYHVAVBVTYHAVBVHBVAV. 2B. HLRGVBCQNKVGYJOV; HLRGVBBQNKVGYJOV; HLRGVBEQNKVGYJOV; HLRGVIlEIIKVGYJEV ; NKVJOVJEV; NKVJAVJEV; HLRGVBIINAQNKVGYJEV• 29. NKVIIARIIIDIAJBV ; IIKVIWlCIINAJBV ; IlKVIWlDIOIAJBV ; IlKVIWlNVIINAJBV ; LNLVJBVA; NKVPAAJCV; NKVPABJCV; NKVPACJCV; NKVPANVJCV; LNLVJCYH; NKVRIIAPABBJBV; NKVRIIAPACCJBV: NKVRIIAPADDJBV; NKVRIIAPARJANNTRJAIlIITJBV ; NKVRIIAPANVJIVJBV ; NKYNLVJBVJEV; 118

interesting...



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by AcesAndNates

I am not quite sure if you read the reports produced by the DIA and the Navy that I posted. The F117 fighter was first produced in 1977 and then used in 1989 (when the public learned about it). It was based on radar deflection. To me the comparison of radar deflection to crafts that can disable navigational and communications equipment at 25 nautical miles, be undetectable by radar, and perform dizzying aerial maneuvers is like apples to to giant pumpkins.


AcesAndNates, I've seen and read many accounts of the manoeuvres of these UFOs.

Now these UFOs are either:

1)Secret Military or experimental manned or unmanned aircraft/ missiles.
2) Secret or experimental military technologies......that could even be projected holograms.
3) Natural atmospheric/electro magnetic earth phenomena.
4) ET

To me though...........there is simply not enough evidence to jump to the conclusion that it must be ET simply because pilots or military can't explain it, and still think that it is much more likely to be secret craft or natural phenomena.

edit on 24-4-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by ashtonkusher
interesting...


"Outer space" eh..........which University did that astronomer graduate from!



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:27 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Mig-21 intercepted a UFO and when his
command officer gave him permission to fire
on the UFO, then the MIG and the pilot
disintegrated


So these guys do use weapons ? Can understand that National security do take the threats like this very serious. If they can disintegrate planes and people in a blimp and not choose to evade earth defenses, then to me you are trying to power play the whole thing?



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jinglelord
From section "G" Pg 154

The objects were indicated as friendly and numbering two but that they were un-identifiable


How does one determine an un-identifiable object as friendly?

This hints to some really good stuff... I'd sure like to know who identified them as friendly and what they knew!




My definition of friendly vs hostile would be something like;

Objects didn't attack plane = Friendly
Objects blew plane to smithereens = Hostile

that's just me though



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by djz3ro


My definition of friendly vs hostile would be something like;

Objects didn't attack plane = Friendly
Objects blew plane to smithereens = Hostile

that's just me though


Unless of course it was a "friendly fire" incident.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 07:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Logical one
 


very true or, i guess an enemy craft doing recon



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 08:25 AM
link   
No, they released files that talk about UFOs, that does not mean that they are extra terrestrial, it means that they are unknown flying objects.




posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 09:04 AM
link   
CIA has already admitted that gov officials including the so called Blue Book investigators lied about the nature of the sightings that were connected to classified military projects.


According to later estimates from CIA officials who worked on the U-2 project and the OXCART (SR-71, or Blackbird) project, over half of all UFO reports from the late 1950s through the 1960s were accounted for by manned reconnaissance flights (namely the U-2) over the United States. (45) This led the Air Force to make misleading and deceptive statements to the public in order to allay public fears and to protect an extraordinarily sensitive national security project. While perhaps justified, this deception added fuel to the later conspiracy theories and the coverup controversy of the 1970s. The percentage of what the Air Force considered unexplained UFO sightings fell to 5.9 percent in 1955 and to 4 percent in 1956


full report available on their website




BQM145



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 09:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by ashtonkusher

Recently a series of radio messages was heard coming from outer space. The transmission was not continuous but was cut by pauses into pieces which could be taken as units, for they were repeated over and over again. The pauses show here as punctuation. The various combinations have been represented by letters of the alphabet, so that the messages can be written down. Each message except the first is given here only once. The serial number of the message has been supplied for each reference. 1 . ABCDEFGHJKLMNOPQRSTUV ABCDEFCHJKLMNOPQRSTUV ABCDEFGHJKLMNOPQR etc. 2. AA. B;AAA.C; AAAA.D; AAAAA.E; AAAAAA.F; AAAAAAA.G. 3. LAA; LBB. LCC; LDD; LEE; LFF; LGG. 4. LBKAA; LCKBA; LCKAB; LDKCA; LDKBB; LDKAC; LEKDA; LEKCB; LEKBC; LEKAD; LFKEA; LFKDB; LFKCC; LFKBD; LFKAE. 5. LFKAKBC; LFKCKBA; LGKAKBD; LGKCKAC; LKAKBCKKABC. 6. LAllBA; LBYCA; LAMCB; LCllDA; LBIIDB; LAMDC; LDMEA; LCMEB; LBMEC; LAMED. 7. LNIIAA; LNYBB; LNMCC; LNIIDD; LNIIEE; LNYFF; LNMGG. 8. LAOAA; LNONA; LBOAB; LBOBA; LNONB; LNOBN; LDOBB; LDOAD; LFOAF; LFOBC. 9. LFOAOBC; LFOCOBA; LFOBOCA; LODOEFOODEF. 10. LDRBB; LBRBA; LARBN; LCRCA; LARCN. 11 . LRBCKDD; LRBCKAG; LRBCOBD; LRBBD. 12. LRCBKDE; LRCBOCC. 13. WRBC; WKAG; LKJAOCC; LKJARCB. 14. LBPJD; LDPJB; LAPCC; LCPFB. ! 117 EXTRATERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE UAB; UBC; UCD; UEJ; UFJ; UGJ; URBCRCB. QLNA; QLAC; QLAKAA; QLNOAA; QLRBBB; QUBB; QHLAALAB; QQLCC; QUJG. SLAA; SUAB; SLBKAA; SLAOAA; SLNIIAA; SHLFOAFLAPFF; SHLAALBB. LATA; LBTKATA; LETKBTCT; LF"I'OCTBT; LGTG; LANTJ. LABCTKOARJBKOBRJAC; LCBATKOCRJBKOBRJAOARJN; LDEFGTKKODRJCOERJBKOFRJAOGRJN; IILJKAAVLGAV ; HLAATRCAVLBAV; HLCAVLAATRAVB; IlLEAVLFKAAV; HLCKACOVLBGOV; HLFOBSOVLCSOV; HLCDOVLAATRDOVB; SLKAVPVKPVAV; SLOAVPVOPVAV; SLKAVKPVTVKKAVPVTV; SLOAVOPVSVOOAVPVSV: HQLAVBVQLllAVBVllBVAV; HQLAVBVQLRAVBVRBVAV; 21 . HLNKBIIRDDDVBODDDVCUVLADDDVLBDDDV; HlNLADVLIINADVLARDVB; IlUVLABVLNBVLNIIBVRBVB; SUVLAVBVQLAVBV; SUVUAVBVUBVAV. 22. QTVUAVBVUBVAV; QTVLAVBVQLAVBV; trrVLRAVBDUNAVLAVB ; HQUAVBWVUBVAVLBVAV: SHQTVGVHVUVQGVQIIV; SHQUVGVHVTVQGVQIIV ; U1VAVUVBVCVUVUVAVBVCV; LTVAVTVBVCVTVTVAVBVCV; LTVAVUVBVCVUVTVAVBVTVAVCV; LUVAVTVBVCVTVUVAVBVUVAVCV. 23. JNVUVBAVCAVBAV; JIlYBAVTVBAVCAV; JNVUVBAVCAVTVBAVCAV; HJIlYBAVCAVLBAVUVBAVCAV; HJIlYBAVCAVLCAVTYBAVCAV; HTVJIlYBAVCAVJNVCAVBAVLBAVCAV; HJNVBAVCAVJNVQCAVQBAV; SHTVJNVBAVCAVJNVCAVDAVJNVBAVDAV. 24. NKVAJAV: HKVBJAV; NKVCJAV: NXVDJAV; NXVEJAV: IIKVFJAV; NKVGJAV; NKVAATJAV; NKVABTJAV; HIlKVAVJAVNKYKAVAJAV. 25. NKYTVABJAV; NKYTVTVABCJAV: NKYTVADTAGTJAV; NKYTVTVGGTAIlIITANATJAV; HTVJNVAVNIIVJNVBVNIIVJNVTVAVBVNIIV : NKYNJAV; NKVJJAV: NKVRJBJAV; NKVRJCJAV; NKVRJDJAV; NKVRJJJAV; NKVRJANTJAV; NKVRJAIlIITJAV ; NKVRJANHIITJAV: HIlKVBVJAYHKVRJBVJAV; HIlKVTVBVCVJAVJlKVKBVCVJAV HIlKVTVBVCVJAVHKVOBVCVJAV HIlKVTVBVCVJAVNKYRBVCVJAV QNKVPABJAV; QNKVJIABJAV; QNKVIINCJAV : QNKVPGFJAV. 26. NKVJAVJOV; NKVIIIlAJOl/ : HNKVKNBVJAVNKVBVJOV; NKVPABJOV; HIlKVTVAVBVJOVNKVIIAVBVJOV; HTVNKYTVAVB.YJOVQLNBVNKYPAVBVJOV; QNKVPANJAV; QNKVPANJOV; SLOPAVBVPCVDVPOAVCVOBVDV: SHUOAVDVOBVCVUPAVBVPACVDV.QLOBVDYH; HIlKVAVJAVIlIIMAAV; er. HTYHAVBVHBVAYHVAVBV; HHVAVBVTYHAVBVHBVAV; HYHVAVBVTYHAVBVHBVAV. 2B. HLRGVBCQNKVGYJOV; HLRGVBBQNKVGYJOV; HLRGVBEQNKVGYJOV; HLRGVIlEIIKVGYJEV ; NKVJOVJEV; NKVJAVJEV; HLRGVBIINAQNKVGYJEV• 29. NKVIIARIIIDIAJBV ; IIKVIWlCIINAJBV ; IlKVIWlDIOIAJBV ; IlKVIWlNVIINAJBV ; LNLVJBVA; NKVPAAJCV; NKVPABJCV; NKVPACJCV; NKVPANVJCV; LNLVJCYH; NKVRIIAPABBJBV; NKVRIIAPACCJBV: NKVRIIAPADDJBV; NKVRIIAPARJANNTRJAIlIITJBV ; NKVRIIAPANVJIVJBV ; NKYNLVJBVJEV; 118

interesting...


This doesn't look like a message, this looks like the key that the EARTH Scientists made to encode intelligent messages. Correct?



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 09:14 AM
link   
reply to post by EartOccupant
 


Man that does describe the Norway spiral to a "T".



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 09:15 AM
link   
I've gone through some of the documents posted at the NSA site and one thing bothered me. The use of classified 'code' words. During the 1970's while in the U.S. Army, I had a TOP SECRET CRYPTO SIOP/ESI clearance with SPECIAL INTELLIGENCE access where I worked for DIA in the SSO. Basically a comm center specialist. I received and transmitted documents with these and other 'code' words on them. Just the mention of these 'code' words was classified in conjunction with message traffic.
Unless the government has changed it's COMMINT classifications, not unheard of, they are still considered classified.
I can see two of the five on these documents and one is half-heartily scratched out, the other is plan as day. I wonder what gives?



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 09:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Niccawhois
 


I've seen the Norway Spiral videos. Nowhere is a search light beam visible.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 10:41 AM
link   
So this is how disclosure starts... At least are gov is covering there butts so they can say "We told you they were real DUH!



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 11:15 AM
link   
reply to post by AcesAndNates
 


No offense,

Take the Norwegian spiral and imagine 10 persons looking coincidently up.. Seeing something spiraling out, and a blue beam coming out of it.. just ordinary people, not expecting this. Now ask those people to write down what they saw afterwards

Also depending on distance and angle, they could describe the blue corkscrew beam as a light beam coming down..



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


Here is the link: www.nsa.gov...

Naa, reread it. its just more examples of the test
paragraph 1 sets up the history of the test, then paragraph 2 starts with the narration to lead into the hypothetical message.

After a brief checking btw, I seen the pattern is using 3rd dimension modelling (the 5 letters = space coordinance), the occasional longer ones being different space point references,, and the longer ones still may be referencing time or something else (unsure about those).
If someone was to graph out the 5 letters, they may end up with a 3 dimensional structure..thats what my 5 minute analysis leads me to believe

but ya, besides being a fun puzzle, its just an addition to the original test as stated in paragraph one.


I'm kind of hoping that the combined population of the DFW metoplex marches on the Whitehouse demanding disclosure. I'd like to see how they deal with 10 million voices crying out in unison; "DISCLOSE!"


Ya, good luck with that
getting a million voices marching on washington to demand something based solidly in objective reality (such as civil rights in the 60s) is damn near impossible...much less people demanding disclosure of UFO information which is based primarily on speculation, fruitcakes discussing reptilian shapeshifters, and the like.

Better to hope some people in the know steal and public documents through something like wikileaks..that far more likely to happen.



posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Tahnya86
 


I'm with you on that... i had a discussion with a Jahova's witness last week. I listened to what he had to say as I enjoy other peoples reasoning... but when i asked him if he believed in aliens he went wild.
I was a 'sinner in the eyes of the lord' and 'you shouldnt listen to the devil' was his response.... this from a man that claimed to have seen god.

Ironic really how what we believe is almost the same, but my version of god was sci-fi.

My own mother tells me I'm nuts from time to time and my friends take a lot of pleasure in pointing at clouds and saying 'E.T Phone home'... which makes me chuckle.

The big I TOLD YOU SO is close, and I will take much pleasure in rubbing it in when its here.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Finally it has happened but will wait a month or two to see if there is a stance from either The White House or The US Department of Defense.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 07:43 AM
link   
Probably a balloon.

Or probably a balloon.

But always a UFO, and that's all I need to hear. They could never say with certainty.



new topics

top topics



 
82
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join