It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
With two field trips into the area surrounding the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant now completed, our flagship the Rainbow Warrior has raised its anchor and set said for Japan to undertake a third, focusing on the threatened marine ecosystem off Japan’s eastern coast.
It has now been more than five weeks since Japan was hit with a trio of disasters, Greenpeace has had radiation monitoring teams in the field, testing food, soil samples outside the 20km (and now 30km) evacuation zone around the Fukushima plant.
However, with radioactive water continually leaking from the plant and TEPCO releasing huge quantities of contaminated water into the ocean, it is time to extend our testing activities to include the marine environment threatened by radioactive contamination.
The Rainbow Warrior set sail from Taiwan today, packed with scientific equipment and an experienced radiation monitoring team, ready to conduct contamination testing of the Fukushima marine ecosystem.
The extent of contamination from the plant is a major concern, so our aim is to get clear, independent information about the scope of this disaster out to the people of Japan and the international community.
Letter to mods:
I really don't see why my post was removed. I was replying to Des's post about the youTube video in which the man was discussing censorship. My post responded to that idea of censorship and the fact that censorship is being used as a way to silence the debate. It could be a kind of nuclear war and I welcomed folks to the new era of nuclear war. My reply was directly relevant to the topic she posted. I quoted Shakespeare at the end, was that the reason? However there is a reply to my post by Pilot that you did not remove that consists entirely of a quote by Yeats and does not in any way mention censorship or nuke power.
I'm a bit confused why you allowed Destiny's post and Pilot's reply but not mine. Perhaps you could elaborate on this for me so I can avoid making this mistake in the future?
Respectfully,
Wertwog
Sunday, 20 March 2011
Total information blackout on Fukushima Unit 4 reactor raises serious questions about truth of situation
The status of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant's Unit 4 reactor is one of the most critical aspects in determining the severity of the impending nuclear meltdown. After all, the most recent temperature readings available showed that the rods there were three times hotter than they should be, which was far worse than the other reactors at the time. And yet for several days, basic information like whether or not there is actually water left in Unit 4's cooling pool, or what the current temperature is of the spent fuel rods there, is no longer being supplied and reported, at least not accurately.
On Thursday, NaturalNews reported that the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had announced the cooling pools in Unit 4 had run dry, and that the temperatures were spiking out of control (www.naturalnews.com...). As NRC made this announcement, though, Japanese officials and spokesmen from Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), owner of the Fukushima plant, insisted that the pools were not dry and that the situation was stable.
Besides this conflicting and confusing information, there is the other disturbing fact that on-the-ground temperature readings of Unit 4 immediately stopped being taken the day of the NRC announcement. And since that day, there has been no official update on the temperature of the rods at Unit 4, or an actual verified account of the water status in the cooling pools.
A recent report explains that the Japanese government deceived and withheld pertinent information from the mayor of a city 12 miles downwind of the nuclear plant -- the mayor literally had to take matters into his own hands and bravely urge an evacuation of his city just last night for the people's own protection -- and he did this in direct opposition to the official government position (www.naturalnews.com...).
And you can be sure that if the situation gets worse for the US, the US government will likely take a similar position and continue to insist that there is nothing to be concerned about. This is why individuals must think for themselves -- rather than let the government think for them -- and be prepared for whatever may come. Remember, preparedness has nothing to do with fear-mongering, and everything to do with simply being smart and staying informed about a situation. Taking practical steps to protect you and your family from potential threats is the only natural response to a situation of this magnitude.
Read more: www.setyoufreenews.com...
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Destinyone
Here is the MIC, ministry of communication , Government of Japan's new censorship directive letter in original form Japanese: www.soumu.go.jp...
You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.
Originally posted by vox2442
+Minor snippage+
These rumours tend to be spread via anonymous blog/web posting, cellphone web, or text message. And because they're designed to cause harm, the ministry has issued the release above asking local providers to deal with such content in the same way ATS does.
You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.
ATS T&C, article 15. Here on ATS, knowingly false information gets you a red flag and post removal. Is this censorship? Tricky, that.
The request is no more than a request for moderation. And until you can provide me with evidence - eg. a youtube link that you can see, but I can't; I'll see no reason to get worked up about this.
Washington (CNN) -- If you're one of the millions of Americans who get even a portion of your electric power from a nuclear generating plant, for more than three decades you've been paying a tax, whether you realize it or not, to fund the storage of nuclear waste from that plant in a safe place.
Collected at an estimated $750 million a year, the Nuclear Energy Institute now says this so-called "nuclear waste fund" amounts to close to $30 billion. And it is not being used to pay for the storage of a single ounce of spent nuclear fuel.
"The government has made much more of a mess than it should have been," Jay Silberg, a Washington lawyer, told CNN. (con't at edition.cnn.com...
Originally posted by Destinyone
Originally posted by vox2442 And until you can provide me with evidence - eg. a youtube link that you can see, but I can't; I'll see no reason to get worked up about this.
Sorry, I forgot that some ATS members, living in Japan, have had their youtoob access restricted by the Government of Japan, since the crisis began. The video I posted was a CCN (news) segment on the problems of spent fuel storage, here in the U.S..
Since you have been restricted from viewing certain content on youtoob, I found the article, so you may read it.