It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why we should support and welcome the NWO!

page: 2
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 11:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by christof94
Think about it. Wouldn't it be much more efficient to have power and control centralized, rather than spread out between multiple governments that have conflicting interests? That way, the entire world is working towards a common goal instead of fighting over resources and whose religion is better. Wouldn't it be better for our progression as a species to thin out the heard of rebels and mouth breathers and let the intelligent leaders and cooperative civilians survive and thrive? What is wrong with D.U.M.B.s? Why SHOULD they be concerned about saving millions of ordinary citizens who are ignorant and will refuse to cooperate anyway? Why shouldn't the people who want to hinder the human race and society be placed into correctional prisons?

I get it - it's not ideal to live under one tyrannical government. It sucks that people have to die for it to work. But it would be far more functional than our current nationalistic system that is primitive in nature. It's much more difficult for human beings to evolve as a society when we're blowing each other up over oil and mythical sky wizards, don't you think? By fighting globalism, you're behaving exactly like the "elites" that you so hate. You hate your government for hoarding wealth and keeping you in the dark, but you hate globalism because you want to hold on to your luxuries and convenient lifestyle, regardless of the millions that are starving and homeless because of nationalism and capitalism. Tell me how you can rationalize that? It's time to let go of our destructive nationalistic ideals and sacrifice for the common good. I, personally, will embrace the New World Order with open arms, even if I become a casualty of it.
edit on 22-4-2011 by christof94 because:


Your a sociopath, of course your kind would feel more comfortable living in a totalitarian state.
Sociopaths prefer communism or any other similar type of state that enables every leadership position to be filled with sociopaths(see pathocracy). You don't understand the virtues of capitalism because you have no internal conceptualization of right or wrong, fair or unfair. Your ilk see nothing wrong with taking what you will as long as it suites your purpose.

P.S the millions are starving because of globalism.
-
To others who think I am being harsh analyze the OP. The OP is a text book sociopath.

www.sociopathworld.com...
www.thehiddenevil.com...




posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 11:38 PM
link   
the NWO has said they wish to ERADICATE 85 percent of the world's population
this will cut down on administartive overhead AND reduce crowding at our favourite beaches...
GoNWO!



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 12:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by christof94
I, personally, will embrace the New World Order with open arms, even if I become a casualty of it.
edit on 22-4-2011 by christof94 because:

Pardon me, but what the hell is wrong with you?
And just why is it that you assume that the NWO is actually a benevolent force?



Originally posted by cosmicslop
These "diversities" are the spice of life! You want to live in a wheat toast world? A correctional facility for non-conformists, really? This is either the work of a government employee or a twisted ploy to get some ATS points... Scary, regardless.

My feelings EXACTLY. This whole "There is only one race - the human race" nonsense needs to go. It's just unnatural garbage. There certainly are differences in human populations - and there's nothing wrong with that in the slightest.
And yeah, this guy is probably just a damned informant.







edit on 25-4-2011 by AngryOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 12:19 AM
link   
reply to post by christof94
 


Yes, I see where you're going with your statements, if they're not tongue in cheek- but might I ask you wait a bit until I can get out of here, (preferably by ascension so I don't have to make the rounds again)- as I can't imagine a more nightmare existence than the one you propose?

That said- the greater the weakness within the individual...the stronger the desire for outside intervention in personal affairs. I would prefer a global New World Order that allowed for the truth that not all of us are looking for pseudo parental figures to continue dictating our every move and action.

Want a new world order? Step up the personal discipline and responsibility, world wide. Until then- it is just exchanging one type of chaos/oppression for another.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 01:30 AM
link   
This thread boggles the mind with its naive stupidity.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 09:10 AM
link   
dose the "herd" need to be thinned out......dare i say it but yes! but not systamaticly! hopefully nature or some natural event or what have you completly oblerates us untill the olny way of life the small pockets of people left can adapet with is more of a tribal and smaller social structure. we are too crammed together like chickens and hens in an industrial farm. a One world goverment is the most stupid idea i have ever herd and if "tptb" are really working towards this, then they are just as stupid as the money hungry groveling masses of "trash" that they controll. we need to be taken down a few nothces and the humble need to lead those who have their tail between there legs when the earth/some diease or pandamic/starvation/object from space/sun storm/ice age bitch slaps them. if "SHTF" then im out. gonna go in the woods where no one can find me and live my days out alone. im sick of how the world is and there is no point in fighting this. as much as i say we should be put in are place by nature. we are gonna do it to are selves. its so sad really. im olny 28 and i know there is no hope. not from the left or right. oh well though whats it matter in the end anywise?



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
I literally feel sick to my stomach after reading your post. It is very clear and apparent that you are VERY uneducated on the shadows of how our government works.



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 03:05 AM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Problem is... in order to be able to control parental rights to such a degree would mean that you've already become the thought police. That's where it all falls apart.

It would be that invasive. Reproduction isn't just limited to the legal realm. It is a biological imperative for most of us.

The law would have to control every aspect of daily life, which it already has a good jump on.

You obviously read Orwell. Do you see 1984 as a warning? Or a step forward?

Being forced to be RFID chipped seems just as criminal to me as does murder.

If you have a cell phone you are presently being tracked. Records are kept. It's not just FB and Google. We need more surveillance? More control?

No thanks.

I like to keep my Orwellian Nightmares contained within the pages of a book.

We are pretty much heading that direction anyway, and are already there in a sense:

Okay, granted, so not all of us are being watched all the time... but anyone of us could be at any time.

Planned Parenthood is pretty much an abortion mill. There's the state sanctioned birth control.

We already have the constant war thing going on.

Sounds like Orwell's dream come true.



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 03:40 AM
link   
Unfortunatelly the OP has a point.Since humans are incapable of working their problems and their differences under the current circumstances,we might need someone to do this for us.A global saviour/goverment that will stop the wars and the corruption.

And that is exactly what their goal is.Create chaos all over the globe,so when they come, the average Joe/Jane will embrace them.

Have you noticed in all sci-fi shows and books all the alien races are under one administration and future Earth manages to make space travel possible only after they unite under one goverment?
Propaganda or the sad truth?



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 03:56 AM
link   
reply to post by christof94
 


u just don't get it.
we as a human species
differ too greatly for
everyone to have the same
government. 90% of the
population of the world would
be tossed aside like a rag doll.

Agamemnon was once told on a battlefield
that the world is too big for one entity to rule.
And he scoffed at the remark. he found out later
he was wrong.

And the NWO is gonna find out they are wrong also.
The only question is: how many people have to die
before they believe it ???



posted on May, 19 2011 @ 08:47 AM
link   
reply to post by SlackOps
 


You have some points, but I believe that the bigger picture is being ignored. Right now there is no major global threat, whether it was an outbreak, and asteroid, or like Reagan said, "an E.T. threat", so a NWO seems un-called for.

But seem to be that 'they' know way more than they are telling us (which is the main conspiracy) and it probably is difficult trying to get the world to join together to work toward a common goal.

RFID chip? I doubt that it will be hard to sell....look at how fast technology is moving, and how much we have to accept it and use it. Look at how cell phones are upgraded every 2 weeks darn near, and have more and more big-brother features along with simplified ways of communication. Once a few celebrities get it, it'll be the new 'thing'.

Population Control? If reproduction never gets to the point that it is regulated, we will reproduce out of control? Why? Because we do it now. Too man women on welfare reproduce out of control and sadly some will admit they do it to gain more government benefits. I consider it 'out of control' because if they can't take care of the children they already have, why do they continue to have more? Because the government currently allows it.

Sovereignty? Why does a planet need separate nations with different agendas and ideologies to wage war against one another? I'm sure this is a primitive thing, as I would imagine other more advanced civilizations have already gotten past this idea.

Like Dr. Micho stated, out of 5 levels of standards of civilizations, we are a Level 0 civilization because of our reluctance to a NWO, and I understand what he meant



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 03:51 AM
link   
so

has the op ever been to a centralized nation

or lived under communism



posted on May, 20 2011 @ 04:07 AM
link   
I'm just curious what anyone thinks posting on internet forums will do to stop the
ever encroaching one world order ?

With the advent of better and better technologies their grip only gets firmer, no
matter how many of you think you are "awake" you have to ask yourselves,
truthfully, what has your "awakened state" done to stop their plans ?

The truthful answer is, nothing.

Their plans proceed forward, what has been done to stop any of those plans ?

Trillions of dollars are squandered and stolen, what has been done to stop it ?

As new generations are born they grow up into the current world situation and
never think to look into the past and see what is wrong with today.

People are, overall, short sighted and mentally lazy, TPTB dedicate their lives
to shaping a future where they can count on the cattle like nature of humans.

As long as mankind is more concerned with porn, consumer junk, imaginary
"gods" and other trivial nonsense TPTB automatically win.



posted on May, 23 2011 @ 05:00 AM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Who's ignoring the bigger picture?

We will just have to agree to disagree on the NWO. Call me a cave man. lol.

We can't trust our leaders with one nation, let alone the world. What more would they hide under the umbrella of world governance?

There is no reason why every man, woman, and child on this planet can't be fed, save for the creeps that run it.

I'm not necessarily completely against the idea of a unified planet. I get it. But for that we need a common enemy or goal, and not an imaginary or manufactured one. Good luck with that.

Who among us would want to live in a total police state?
Who would want anyone telling them what can or can't be done with regards to reproduction?

Who among us would care to be under constant surveillance, though it's pretty much around the corner. (Hey UK, how's it going on that btw?)

Some of us were born individuals, the rebellious types, and idealists. So there isn't much hope for some of us in the NWO citizenship plan.

Who's up for some eugenics?

Don't worry though... opinions don't matter. This thing is happening. Be careful what you wish for.

I agree with most of the points you made. Even though many abuse the system, they do so only because it is allowed. The state could just as easily bring it to an end with a pen stroke.

Not everyone should be a parent, granted. There are many that surely do not deserve to be, and many that wish they never were. It may not be 'right' so to speak, but neither would controlling that aspect of the entire species. The logistics alone...

If you where a parent would you want to need a permit or the state's permission to bring your offspring into the world? What would the punishment be for such a breech of protocol? Termination of said new life? (Or yours?) Where would that place our kids if we were under such policy?

(don't get me wrong, I'm ok with having the choice. I'm not like anti-abortion or anything, I just think about it from the perspective of being placed in that situation.)

And... as someone mentioned, none of us would be here to reap any said benefits seeing as how (according to mission statement) most of the population will be gone. Safe to assume that means anyone here and everyone they know would be gone along with it.

Let's put all that energy into colonizing another planet to fight over!







edit on 23/5/11 by SlackOps because: to add some stuff.



posted on May, 23 2011 @ 05:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by christof94
Think about it. Wouldn't it be much more efficient to have power and control centralized, rather than spread out between multiple governments that have conflicting interests? That way, the entire world is working towards a common goal instead of fighting over resources and whose religion is better. Wouldn't it be better for our progression as a species to thin out the heard of rebels and mouth breathers and let the intelligent leaders and cooperative civilians survive and thrive? What is wrong with D.U.M.B.s? Why SHOULD they be concerned about saving millions of ordinary citizens who are ignorant and will refuse to cooperate anyway? Why shouldn't the people who want to hinder the human race and society be placed into correctional prisons?

I get it - it's not ideal to live under one tyrannical government. It sucks that people have to die for it to work. But it would be far more functional than our current nationalistic system that is primitive in nature. It's much more difficult for human beings to evolve as a society when we're blowing each other up over oil and mythical sky wizards, don't you think? By fighting globalism, you're behaving exactly like the "elites" that you so hate. You hate your government for hoarding wealth and keeping you in the dark, but you hate globalism because you want to hold on to your luxuries and convenient lifestyle, regardless of the millions that are starving and homeless because of nationalism and capitalism. Tell me how you can rationalize that? It's time to let go of our destructive nationalistic ideals and sacrifice for the common good. I, personally, will embrace the New World Order with open arms, even if I become a casualty of it.
edit on 22-4-2011 by christof94 because:


This is one of the saddest and sickest things I've read in a long time.



posted on May, 23 2011 @ 05:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by christof94
reply to post by cosmicslop
 


These "diversities" you speak of are actually just perceived differences that are imposed on us by cultures, religions and governments. Doing away with nationalism and nationalistic cultures would help ease that problem. Having a correctional system in place for those who display behaviors and ideals that are destructive would help as well.


Didn't the British Empire (and other Empires through history) have the exact same mindset when they killed natives for progress??
The NWO as an ideal has already been practised in some form or another, countless times through history and is has always FAILED.
At least while individual countries collapse, others can take up the slack and give people somewhere to flee to.
With a global government, when that fails, where do you run to?
Last I heard, there is no reliable public transport to Mars or anywhere else.



posted on May, 23 2011 @ 09:24 AM
link   
reply to post by SlackOps
 


The bigger picture is advancement into a higher form of civilization.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

We are going to have to accept CHANGE in order to evolve. But the NWO is only 'evil and scary' because of the resistance to change/evolution. Think about it:

Population Control
Global currency
Global communication
Technological advancements
(slow) Eradication of religion

How else will we quit killing each other over religion, race, or different ideologies?



posted on May, 24 2011 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


Killing each other IS population control.

The only reason there seems to be lack of resources is because they are being hoarded. There is plenty of food and land to go around.

Overpopulation is a myth. Just because "Family A" or "Dynamic A" crams 4 generations into a two bedroom townhouse and exploits the welfare system doesn't mean there are too many humans.

If it's overpopulation that is the big concern, then why worry about killing each other? It's just thinning the herd from that perspective.

We killed each other long before government and religion. Those are only justifications to satisfy the moral dilemma of why we do it.

I've thought long & hard about it. It still comes up short on being the solution.

Homicide. Murder will not stop. People will still be envious, greedy, hateful, malicious... or become embroiled with passion. All of those things existed before money, institutionalized establishments, or even most recognized ideologies.

Putting the boot down isn't going to stop that. Most seem to feel that it will make things immeasurably worse. I tend to agree.

In that vein, the "NWO" could also be viewed as a temporary solution to a permanent problem, because after all it too would be an empire... and those crumble, whereas human degeneracy has outlived every tyrant or oppressive regime that ever strode the earth.

Taking that part of humanity away would make us no longer human, as would the implementation of the kinds of policies and procedures that would be required to make it happen.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join