It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Q: (L) When I was reading [the Cassiopaean Transcripts] about Oak Island the other day, I noticed that we never followed up on certain things. Could we ask on that now?
Q: (L) Okay, you said at that time that a Transdimensional Atomic Remolecularizer was buried at Oak Island. Is that correct?
Q: (L) Who buried it there?
A: Learn. [Since they had already told us that the Lizards were involved, it was clear that we were supposed to learn something about this OTHER than who, specifically, put it there.]
Q: (L) Well, we are getting ready to learn because you are going to teach us, is that correct?
A: You already have tools.
Q: (L) What do you mean we already have tools?
A: We are trying to teach you to use your most precious commodity.
Q: (L) And that is, of course, our minds?
A: You betcha!
Q: (L) Okay. What I read about Oak Island was that there were legends of lights being seen there prior to 1703. A: Yes.
Q: (L) Prior to 1703 might put the burial of whatever is there at least prior to that time, correct?
Q: (L) Were those lights the lights of the craft of other beings other than the natives of this planet?
A: Electromagnetic profile.
Q: (L) Okay, the thing that was noticed when the kid who discovered this mystery arrived on the Island was that a limb was sawed off of a tree over the depression and there were marks of a rope on the limb as though ropes and perhaps pulleys had been used. (T) If someone more advanced than humans at the time dug the pit, they wouldn't have used chain hoists and pullys. (L) That is what I am getting at. So, if there was evidence of this kind of stuff on the tree, it would seem to indicate that somebody had been doing something there who was a little more human or limited in their technology, is that correct?
Q: (L) Now, my thought is, after reading about all the details of the diggings and barriers, and depth of the pit is that, it was beyond human technology to have produced that pit at that point in history?
A: Beyond known technology.
Q: (L) And yet humans may have been involved in that activity?
Q: (J) Think back to when we were talking about it and you mentioned the lights.
A: Some humans have always communed with "higher" powers. We are speaking of concious communion in this and other and instances
Q: (L) Okay, there was conscious communion between humans and other powers in the building of this pit. What group of humans was this?
A: It's fun to learn.
Q: (J) How about pirates? (L) Well, who was in this area? Eskimos?
Q: (L) Indians?
A: Keep going, network.
Q: (L) There were the French and the English. How about the Vikings? (F) No, the Vikings were 600 years before that. (T) Well, we don't know how long ago the pit was dug. (J) I'm still... yeah, good question. (L) When was the pit itself dug?
A: 1500s. Nationality is not issue. [Note that they are speaking of the digging of the pit and NOT the original placing of the object. Clearly someone was instructed to dig there to access this thing at some later point in "time."]
Q: (T) Well, this pit was dug sometime in the middle of the 1500s. (J) And it was discovered in the 1700s.
A: Access sect information.
Q: (L) So, it could have been a religious group?
A: Now, who claimed communion, Laura has in memory banks from absorption of mass reading practice. [That may have been true, but I was sure drawing a big blank at the time of these questions!]
Q: (F) Was there a sect from that era that claimed communion with higher powers?
Q: (L) I think that this may have had something to do with the people that later became known as the Cajuns, they called the area Arcadia; it was a French religious sect that was living there...
A: Maybe. [And here we have a significant clue: Arcadia. This was to prove to be a link to MANY things, as we shall see.]
Q: (L) Now, this article says that it would have taken a hundred men working every day for six months to have built this pit...
Q: (L) The article also says that it must have been dug in 1780...
Q: (L) When they drilled into the pit, it was claimed that some bits of gold came up and a piece of parchment and maybe some other odds and ends depending on which story you read. What were these?
A: Alchemy. [Notice that they did not confirm the story about the gold and parchment, but merely gave an additional "clue" to go with "Arcadia."]
Q: (T) The remolecularizer made it. (L) Why not? If these people were involved in doing this, why did they do it? A: Instructed to do it.
Q: (L) They were instructed by the higher powers they were in contact with, to dig down there and access a remolecularizer that had been buried ages ago, correct?
Q: (L) What did they intend to do with it? Did someone intend to come back for it at some point in time?
Q: (T) Is it buried there in that location for a specific reason?
Q: (T) Does the location itself have something to do with the purpose of it?
Q: (T) Are there other ones buried on the planet?
Q: (T) Are they aligned to each other on the planet in some kind of geometric pattern?
Q: (L) Okay. I want to get back to the function of this thing. You say it is buried not to be dug up. It is actually buried to stay there? Is that correct?
A: Yes. [And this single remark makes so many things clear, particularly the false assumption that a "treasure" was buried there. The only reasonable idea that one can draw from all the confusion regarding the fantastic barriers put in place to "protect" this purported object, is that it was NEVER intended to be dug up... at least NOT by those who have no idea of what they are dealing with!]
Anyhow, The source for this slappy madcap stuff is here...
Thanks for the thread. Oak Island has always intrigued me as well.edit on 21-4-2011 by Frater210 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RicketyCricket
I saw some posts earlier about the original "burier" of the supposed treasure, having conflicting ideals about burying the treasure and not wanting anyone to find it, etc.
How is this for a theory?
The OB (original burier (thats not even a word)) did amass a sizable amount of treasure, and knew it would be found someday, but wanted to make sure only someone that had a resolve as strong as iron, or, hell, even oak, would be the one that received it.
I've been interested in Oak Island ever since I got my treasure map in a box of Shreddies...far too long ago. I am what's called an 'avocational' archaeologist, which is to say I have some academic training in the subject and have held a licence to conduct limited activity. I just don't get paid...
So about 5 years ago, I was put in contact with another avocational who ... introduced me to an 'intuitive archaeologist'...a recognised psychic if you will. We walked some sites together and truth is I haven't checked out some of the details he came up with, but I am still able to...another story.
My associate and the psychic actually went to Oak Island and talked with the partner who is usually on site(Blankenship). One of the external threads supplied here said no artifacts are known to exist. Not so, as the few links of gold chain were produced at this meeting. The psychic held them, and subsequently associated them with the treasure of the Templars. The way I heard it, the psychic was actually given a link to take along and study further. The owner of the site, in turn, apparently believes the gold to have a different provenance. He stated that during the Spanish looting of Central and South America, all the treasure went to Havana, where it was catalogued and put aboard the treasure ships to Spain.
The story goes that the bureaucrat in charge would skim his cut off the top, and add it to his own hoard. He supposedly buried that in sites up the eastern seaboard, and it remains lost to this day. The Oak Island guy saw this as the source of the loot. And Sinclair's castle in New Ross? Not so. The supposed ruins just aren't, simple as that, and this comes from someone in a position to know.
There you are, then. A little more added to the mystery...sorry I can't do names, but you're getting the story some five years old, and a couple names I need to keep to myself. I did see Oak Island from the end of the causeway, though, and ate a Lobster Roll at a nearby restaurant...looking at the island. A fine moment.
Originally posted by anilater
reply to post by RicketyCricket
Here's a map of the treasure fleet route. None of the maps I found show it to be moving up the coast. But if the Govenor was skimming off the top, it's unlikely that he would've used the actual treasure fleet to drop it off in his secret hoard. It's more likely that he would've taken his loot out of the incoming ships and then loaded up some private merchant vessels to go hide it.
If this is a treasure site, there has to be a way around the trap, there's no way someone would bury something they intended to access later and then make an insurmountable booby trap.