If any of you want to decide for yourselves, then consider the following:
1st, read the blog, it speaks for itself. It is really sad that someone will post a blog and then go BACK and re-interpret their own words to fit some eventuality to make it sound more specific than it ever was.
2nd, consider the statements themselves; the author at one time claimed an "event" for "Western North America" as if that were some sort of "insight." People reading that in Cozumel and the Aleutian Islands could say, "wow, that's me!"
Of course, if something tragic occurred in that region/hemisphere, the author would be prompt to say , "See, I told you so." Such broad statements are meaningless.
3rd, consider the positives v. the negatives. You can have 25 "misses" in a row, but if they are framed by 2 alleged "hits," then I guarantee the author would proclaim, "TWO SPECIFIC PREDICTIONS!"
4th, consider the definition of a "hit." If you say "Vietnam," but include every country bordering it and 100's of miles out to sea, and if you say "mid-March" but include everything from February to May, and you say "magnitude 7.0" but accept mags 6 to 12, then how can you claim your "beings" were right?
5th, I'm not even going to go into "beings" able to predict earthquakes, but who cannot even intervene into less-random and more consequential events. Why didn't these "friends of the Earth" warn us of the radiation leaks at Fukushima? Or of the impending approach of Elenin/Nibiru/Planet X? Or of the devastation that awaits us from our unfettered imposition of CO2 and other poisons into the environment?
Will any of us think for ourselves, ask pointed questions, and question the logic of self-promoting statements?
Please, someone read the blog. Please, tell me where I've missed some point. Show me I'm wrong in asking, "What?"
deny ignorance.
jw
The "beings " channelled have not yet provided a single specific "warning." These "messages"
edit on 21-4-2011 by jdub297 because:
sp






