It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schuyler
I've been reading this drama for quite awhile now. If you take all the emotion out of this (which is just about everything) what we have here is one side of a story. We don't know what is really happening here. We know she gave up custody voluntarily when she was going through bad times.
Originally posted by Annee
Did she give up custody? I believe her sister used abandonment as the reason to get custody.
Originally posted by schuyler
It's hard to tell exactly what happened, . . .
Originally posted by schuyler
OP has set herself up for the sympathy vote, . . .
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by schuyler
OP has set herself up for the sympathy vote, . . .
I'm not buying that at all.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Annee
I'm not buying that at all.
Sure she has. She's told one side of her story repeatedly. She's really happy when someone agrees with her. When someone does not, she lashes out at them, repeatedly.
Originally posted by gncnew
Originally posted by Amaterasu
No. Me and my daughter's father (my husband) have been living on one coast. My sister, her partner, her ex-husband and my daughter have been living on the other.
My home is very normal. One man, one woman, and a place in our hearts for our daughter. We rent an apartment.
Look, you don't have to agree with me - but you came on here asking ATS of all things for input. This means either you are seeking affirmation for your choices, or you're actually confused and need guidance.
I suspect the former - but it doesn't really matter what I think. I'm simply calling things as I see them from the limited amount I know of your life from this post.
BUT
If your lesbian sister is living with her girlfriend and her ex husband - and the judge still gave them custody over you - chances are you're not fit to be a mom.
Unless your sister is related to the Trumps or something, she's not a power player with the money to make this a "conspiracy".
And your common-law husband (funny how you left that out at first) was fighting for custody on his own? What the hell is going on exactly? The whole thing sounds high degrees of absurd.
You've been out of work for 5 years, and per your own ridiculous estimation you've applied to 35,000 jobs (an average of 20 a day, every day, for five years???).
We can just ignore that entire statement as it's patently fictional. You need to get a job. Period. Then, you need to get married - in front of a judge or a pastor - with a legit license.
Then, you need to take your sister to court with a lawyer that you've hired.
Your lawyer will cite precedent after precedent where the state consistently awards custody to the birth parents even after previous judgements. Your lawyer can then cite the obvious unstable home life your sister is providing by living a confusing mix of lifestyle.
But - my guess is that you'll do none of this, you'll instead choose to fight poverty with ATS links and forum posts (still just shaking my head at this whole gimmick you've got going) and pretty much have zero impact in any measurable way in either your own life, or your daughters.
Like I said before - it's harsh, but someone needs to tell you the truth in love. I don't judge you a bit. Do your thing girl, just don't expect others to placate to it.
Originally posted by schuyler
I've been reading this drama for quite awhile now. If you take all the emotion out of this (which is just about everything) what we have here is one side of a story. We don't know what is really happening here. We know she gave up custody voluntarily when she was going through bad times. We know that the opposing party has been successful in court and the OP has not. Given the reported relationships between the parties that is puzzling. What kind of case did the opposing party make that was so compelling that a judge was willing to terminate the OP's parental rights? That's really very rare, so it has to be something pretty dramatic. OP says it's all lies, but the fact is we do not have the benefit of being able to talk to the opposing side.
I think you can see hints of what has happened by simply reading this thread. OP is a good writer and has laid out an extensive set of grievances. When people reply to her and the reply is not to her liking, she just attacks and more often than not, calls them names. She seethes in anger, whether it is in court where her own lawyer says she is screwed, or whether she is on ATS taking on all comers, lashing back at every single point made, defending her every phrase. And doing all this on ATS?
Is this rational behavior? Has she really applied for 35,000 jobs and not got a one? She blames it all on age discrimination, but maybe it's her attitude. Albert Einstein said the definition of "insanity" is doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. Clearly, what she is doing is not working, therefore her goals must be somewhat different than what she claims. I suspect she gets quite a lot of satisfaction coming here on ATS and throwing her weight around. It's cathartic. Unlike the real world, she can always "win" here because she ALWAYS has the last word.
If you were in a position to do so, would you hire this person? I surely would not. I wouldn't hire her for the front line at McDonald's. This is a package of C-4 that could explode at any moment. If you were a judge and this is what you had to go on, would you award custody? I surely wouldn't do that either. Kids need stability and you're not going to find that here.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Annee
Did she give up custody? I believe her sister used abandonment as the reason to get custody.
It's hard to tell exactly what happened, but apparently she shipped the kid off for awhile and when she went to get the kid back, the sister refused and mayhem ensued, as per her explanation. Apparently at one point sister sent back a whopping $49 she had been given by OP in "support" so that she could then claim she rec'd NO support to set up for the abandonment issue. THEN during her time in court the OP had a temporary lapse of sanity and AGREED to give up custody, but still wanted her XBox back. So, during this crucial court hearing she gave up.
For some reason her sister, her brother, and even the child's paternal grandfather have all allied themselves against her case. All three of these people are blood relatives of the kid. That makes me think we're not getting the entire story here. OP has set herself up for the sympathy vote, but it's not like we have full disclosure. Of course, we all may just be a focus group to help sell the script. Who knows?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by schuyler
OP has set herself up for the sympathy vote, . . .
I'm not buying that at all.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by schuyler
OP has set herself up for the sympathy vote, . . .
I'm not buying that at all.
Sure she has. She's told one side of her story repeatedly. She's really happy when someone agrees with her. When someone does not, she lashes out at them, repeatedly. From her own words we can tell she created this situation. She signed the original paperwork. She agreed to terms. She set it all up. Of course, she was "misled." She was "temporarily insane" and all that, but when you look at the story versus the posts here, it's as if you are talking about two different people entirely.
In the real world we have someone who is easily misled, depressed, and dysfunctional in the most basic of ways.
She's discriminated against, pushed around by others, has a multitude of problems. It's a wonder she can function at all. She's said this stuff herself. Read the two threads she has on this and it just keeps going like the energizer bunny. One bad thing after another has happened to her, never ever her fault.
Yet she comes on here at ATS like gangbusters. She answers every post and if she doesn't agree with you she tears you a new one. So in the real world you have a very passive individual, but here you have a very aggressive individual who fights (and fights very well) with words.
I'm not buying THAT at all.
And with that, I don't really want to involve myself in her train wreck any further, so I'm off to more interesting threads. Thanks. It's been real.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by schuyler
OP has set herself up for the sympathy vote, . . .
I'm not buying that at all.
Sure she has. She's told one side of her story repeatedly. She's really happy when someone agrees with her. When someone does not, she lashes out at them, repeatedly. From her own words we can tell she created this situation. She signed the original paperwork. She agreed to terms. She set it all up. Of course, she was "misled." She was "temporarily insane" and all that, but when you look at the story versus the posts here, it's as if you are talking about two different people entirely.
In the real world we have someone who is easily misled, depressed, and dysfunctional in the most basic of ways. She's discriminated against, pushed around by others, has a multitude of problems. It's a wonder she can function at all. She's said this stuff herself. Read the two threads she has on this and it just keeps going like the energizer bunny. One bad thing after another has happened to her, never ever her fault.
Yet she comes on here at ATS like gangbusters. She answers every post and if she doesn't agree with you she tears you a new one. So in the real world you have a very passive individual, but here you have a very aggressive individual who fights (and fights very well) with words.
I'm not buying THAT at all.
And with that, I don't really want to involve myself in her train wreck any further, so I'm off to more interesting threads. Thanks. It's been real.
Originally posted by Unity_99
So many issues in this case, and it would be less likely in Canada. To begin with, she is not physically capable of most jobs. But she is able to work, but must selectively choose. Her solution is to freelance and work for herself, and a home computer would be essential. I have a different situation myself, but won't share. In any case, everyone has a right to a home, and above the poverty living, and no one should be homeless, and the system is to blame.
However, that being said, what I would do, even with chronic fatigue, in the OP's shoes, IF, I didn't have 5 children, and a home situation that has differences, but health problems, that have different limits to them, is procure a second hand computer, look for donations, put one together. And start small, for things to create and do that can earm more like 1000-2000 a month put together. But the money earned from any of them should be put into more supplies and then diversifying to others.
Low income ways to make money include: fixing computers, installing harddrives and motherboards for people, and reformatting, dual booting, putting a safe linux partions on their windows computer for facebook, teens would really benefit and so would elderly. I've read that that many in seniors homes cant even keep in touch with their families due to computers being virus'd up.
Start a nonprofit and deliver a newsletter but drum up small craftspeople to advertise in it.
Paper mache. Recylce into art, into objects, into tools. Any kind of craft or hobby.
Learn how to build carding boards, or recyled looms. Check on ebay, they're really expensive, and theres always bids on the ones that are cheaper than suppliers.
And think out of the box. ie. survival items might sell.
But in addition, start a small online store, use a free website or platform and arrange a few products that drop ship.
Start one small thing, then buy and add another until you piece together income. That way whatever you're doing uses your true skills, and can be worked around health issues.
Also, move to the area where you daughter lives and if they move, move again. Simply being close is ideal.
Don't send that letter, both in terms of keeping your daughters emotions safe, and in terms of providing legal leverage against you. The letter will be used in court.
I share your political ideas,and there is no reason to allow anyone to suggest that no matter what your situation you have no right to work on behalf of a better world or awareness because you're not living the all american dream.
That is the very thing that prevents most people who are vulnerable, from speaking up. They don't get voices. Yet they're the MOST aware, and the MOST affected.
In fact the real solutions will come from the poor and indigenous the world over, we're the ones with the dreams for a better world, and the majority world wide.
Finding a way to create something from nothing and translating it into a survival skill should the world suddenly fall apart, would be ideal.
And the fact that you share the gift of your intellect, vision and spirit with us in your activism and efforts for awareness, in other words, doing what you can despite current situation, is very positive and don't listen to anyone putting you down.
Moving there but from a position of self motivated, doing your own alternative businesses, would be good in this situation. Its hard to undo spoiling, economically. My niece was alienated from her family, we have branches where one side is middle class, and pats themselves on the back for everything, and very materialistic, and the rest of us, black sheeps in the family who don't see things that way, and instead see through the world entirely. My niece ended up walking that path, and while she is very successful, I'm proud of her, she doesnt have alot of empathy. And between the two, I value the empathy and heart the most. So, being around, being positive and showing something else, gently would make her more well rounded regardless of whether you end up with custody or not.
edit on 25-4-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I am looking for work and fighting for a better world for my daughter. Amazing what One can do. (What "gimmick?" Oh, please do elaborate on THAT bit of wise commentary.) IF someone hires me at MUCH better than minimum wage, I will be able to afford an attorney. So far I haven't been able to get even a minimum wage job.
Originally posted by gncnew
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I am looking for work and fighting for a better world for my daughter. Amazing what One can do. (What "gimmick?" Oh, please do elaborate on THAT bit of wise commentary.) IF someone hires me at MUCH better than minimum wage, I will be able to afford an attorney. So far I haven't been able to get even a minimum wage job.
I live in Alabama. Things are very tough here, not much work to be had. But I see goons every day who I'm not really positive they can spell their name working. Sometimes it's manual labor. Sometimes it's desk jobs.
You talk about "if I can get one above minimum wage"... hell you HAVE no job - take a minimum wage job and work your way up.
And has been pointed out before:
If you have seriously applied to 35k+ jobs in the last five years and not landed one there are only two possibilities:
1. You're insane. You are repeatedly trying the same jobs and same approaches regardless of the lack of success.
2. That's a patent lie - a piece of fiction you're using to garner sympathy for your cause.
Delivery papers, drive a mail car, work at ADT Home security. They just sent me a flyer today saying they're looking for help.
Of course this will mean you'll have to get off of ATS during "working hours" and actually do something productive.
Lastly, it's a gimmick because if you were serious about this poverty/alien/terra thing, you'd be running a website with your own web address. GoDaddy sells them for $10 a year. Tell you what, if you can't pull the scratch out for that - I'll do it for you. But considering you're able to eat, I think you could probably find the cheddar for it if you really were that passionate about saving the world.