It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Math & Science of 'The King's Calendar' No. 2 : Onias III : Teacher of Righteousness
Published on 11/11/05 at 00:17:23 AEST by R .P. BenDedek
The Teacher of Righteousness - Onias III -
The Math and Science. Dead Sea Scrolls:
Essenes: Bible Calendars Dates.
Originally posted by Jordan River
I have found a link between the creation of the septuigent (greek translated version of the Torah) (AKA) and the era of the end of prophecy (which was a rabbinic agreement) and with the Teacher of Righteousness.
I believe that the teacher of righteousness created such a strong sect that Pharisees and many other leaders in Judaism during that era have decided to create an "END" to prophecy. Afterwards, the greek bible was created around 200 B.Cish. (Around the same time the Essenes were gaining ground. BUT! it should be seen that the drastic change of prophetic laws (Jews thought that prophets were no longer useful) were altered during 200 BC, approx the same time the essenic sect begun. Perhaps the essenic sect was questioning the current trend of religious laws, (MONEY FOR ONE) that this created fear for those who need their money, and traditions for their current beliefs.
Originally posted by St Udio
your opening an interesting can of worms there....
i lazily glossed over the concept of the 'Teacher of Righteousness' for a long time now..
but it may have a connection to todays' end times and the ancient-history historical shift in emphasis by the religious authority that issued from Jerusalem
stuff i will tackle:
www.kingscalendar.com...
The Math & Science of 'The King's Calendar' No. 2 : Onias III : Teacher of Righteousness
Published on 11/11/05 at 00:17:23 AEST by R .P. BenDedek
The Teacher of Righteousness - Onias III -
The Math and Science. Dead Sea Scrolls:
Essenes: Bible Calendars Dates.
thanks
edit on 19-6-2011 by St Udio because: (no reason given)
New Model (dead sea scrolls) In short, we suggest a scenario markedly different from that of the standard model (timeline) The teacher of righteousness began his ministray late in the second century B C E. perhaps during the reign of Alexander. After the Pharisees came to power under Salome, they persecuted the Teachers group, which was sympathetic to the Sadducean establishment, eventually hounding the Teacher into Exile. When Hyrcanus II became king, he ended the Jewish civil war of phairsee versus sadducee, Hyrcanus verse aristouble. All of the verifiable historical references within the scolls and the apparent attitudes of the scroll writers to those references, fit this model exceedingly well. of the approximately thirty five identifiable referances in the scrolls to people, processes and events virtually all of them fall in the first century b c e. This is not what one would expect if the Teacher and his group had existed fifty to seventy give years before the dawn of that century. We should have historical refernces in texts identifiably inscribed in the second century and we do not.
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
I am not sure how this ties in with what you're saying, but the Sybillines, and Oracles, although not strictly speaking prophets, were all gradually destroyed, passively as well as actively, by emergent Christianity, cheifly because Christianity, like Judaism, didn't accept women as conduits of divinity. If a woman received a revelation, it was deemed to be from the 'devil'...later they'd call them witches or possessed by demons....though a fair few later made it to sainthood, I should imagine that was little consolation.
Originally posted by bogomil
One group which claimed 'righteousness' can best be compared to the inner-circle of the nazis..the SS.
I take it, that you are familiar with the war-scroll? It's 'righteousness' to such an extent, that it would have people hiding under their beds.
But maybe you are talking about some other kind of 'righteousness'?
Originally posted by Jordan River
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
I am not sure how this ties in with what you're saying, but the Sybillines, and Oracles, although not strictly speaking prophets, were all gradually destroyed, passively as well as actively, by emergent Christianity, cheifly because Christianity, like Judaism, didn't accept women as conduits of divinity. If a woman received a revelation, it was deemed to be from the 'devil'...later they'd call them witches or possessed by demons....though a fair few later made it to sainthood, I should imagine that was little consolation.
Yes, Yes, women were hated everyone knows that. The very early Christians (post Jesus first century) were primarily women though, interesting enough man took that power away from them when organization of the Catholic church was created. I blame Paul mostly. Prophetess are indeed in the old testament and it should be noted that they were accepted enough to be wrote on paper.edit on 19-6-2011 by Jordan River because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
Originally posted by Jordan River
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
I am not sure how this ties in with what you're saying, but the Sybillines, and Oracles, although not strictly speaking prophets, were all gradually destroyed, passively as well as actively, by emergent Christianity, cheifly because Christianity, like Judaism, didn't accept women as conduits of divinity. If a woman received a revelation, it was deemed to be from the 'devil'...later they'd call them witches or possessed by demons....though a fair few later made it to sainthood, I should imagine that was little consolation.
Yes, Yes, women were hated everyone knows that. The very early Christians (post Jesus first century) were primarily women though, interesting enough man took that power away from them when organization of the Catholic church was created. I blame Paul mostly. Prophetess are indeed in the old testament and it should be noted that they were accepted enough to be wrote on paper.edit on 19-6-2011 by Jordan River because: (no reason given)
No, not prophetesses, women as divine conduits, Priestesses. Paul was one of the few who actually maintained contact with the Pythia, and valued their input, often acting on their advice. These were women who were trained from early childhood, highly educated...and as a 'religion' they predate Christianity and Judaism...they were not prophets as much as readers of situations. Anyway, early established Christianity's appeal to women, only really applies to the priviledged classes, as does any notion of choice at all in those times, for men or women. It wasn't so much in those days that women were hated, just that they didn't have many rights or freedoms, neither did most men though. Upper class women, like Hypattia for example, chose it because it seperated them, or rather elevated them 'spiritually' and more importantly, 'morally' over the masses. Prophets, male or female, needed to be state sanctioned, and for what they said to be in accordance with the status quo in order to be memorialised, male or female. It was the chop otherwise, as we know.
Originally posted by Jordan River
Ah, yeah I have heard of them women. lol I was trying to convey that women (lower class) hid in their house and practiced christianity (which was just primarily prayer). The church was in their homes.
Originally posted by Jordan River
I do not know much of the area that you speak of, only a little. I do know that paul was a raging sexist. Raging may be to harsh of a word, but I know that for sure.
Originally posted by Jordan River
I was under the influence that Paul was guided through the some partial communication with God, and not some oracle.
Originally posted by Jordan River
Wow, I knew very little what you discuss, Although not what my topic is about I think you gave me a roadmap into connecting my side with your side.
I must add to your comment that I have a very twisted idea of Greek, they change anything for themselves to make it better (gnostic for example). Anything that gets touched by Greeks, changes. That is my opinion, nor do I deny anything you have written, but it gives me a clearer understanding of the spread of Christianity in early ages.