XM2010 The new Army sniper rifle, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 20-4-2011 @ 11:14 AM by DaddyBare
reply to post by gunshooter



Yeah well I'm still trying to find a firm price for one...
my guess is forget taking two... maybe I can manage 1 if they have a very long lay-away plan


reply posted on 20-4-2011 @ 09:40 PM by Oaktree
reply to post by DaddyBare



I went searching to find a price and google produced this ATS thread from member Nickoli in October.
Claims the price to be $7800.
Edit to add: Obviously not civilian market price.
edit on 20-4-2011 by Oaktree because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-4-2011 @ 01:18 AM by TraptInTheSystem
reply to post by DaddyBare



That is a very sexy rifle. Lately I have been thinking about buying a remington 700 which is the base action for this platform. You could probably buy a remington 700 and buy an aftermarket stock to look somewhat similar and and function the same for far less, i'm assuming.


reply posted on 21-4-2011 @ 03:35 AM by Darce
I tend to judge a rifle based on the cartridge it fires, here's what I dug up;



The US government purchased MK 248 MOD 1 .300 Winchester Magnum match-grade ammunition in 2009 for use in adapted M24 Sniper Weapon Systems and other .300 Winchester Magnum sniper rifles like the US Navy Mk.13s. This ammunition was developed as a .300 Winchester Magnum Match Product Improvement (PIP) and uses the 14.26 g (220 gr) Sierra MatchKing Hollow Point Boat Tail (HPBT) very-low-drag bullet fired at a nominal muzzle velocity of 869 m/s (2,850 ft/s) ± 15.2 m/s (50 ft/s). According to the US Navy this ammunition should increase the maximum effective range of .300 Winchester Magnum sniper rifle systems to 1,370 m (1,500 yd),


Now ~1.4 kms is an amazing effective range, and I suppose that has a lot to do with the .300 Winmag cartridge and the heavy 220gr bullet it fires. I went on to read this;



However, the short neck with the shoulder moved forward does cause some real problems. Since the .300 Winchester Magnum is designed to work out of a standard length action heavier bullets will need to be seated deeper into the case. Since many heavier .30 caliber (7.62 mm) bullets have a long taper, and these bullets will be required to be seated deeper into the case, the neck will end up being positioned in the ogive rather than on the shank of the bullet due to the fact that Winchester had moved the shoulder forward.[6] This prevents the case from having a good grip on the bullet. Under recoil such loosely held bullets in the magazine will be pushed back into the case. Also, if using a highly compressed load the cartridge might “grow” in length and may not be able to fit into the magazine. For these reasons bullets weighing over 200 gr (13 g) are not recommended.[18] Norma goes further recommending that bullets heavier than 180 gr (12 g) not be used with the cartridge


So they went 20-40gr over the recommended limit in bullet weight. And so I wonder, does this problem come up with the XM2010? Could this cause jams or failures to feed into battery properly? I'm sure the Army would have tested it to all lengths necessary, I suppose they chose the greater range over keeping within the recommended limits of the cartridge. What do you guys think?

edit source;
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 21-4-2011 by Darce because: source
edit on 21-4-2011 by Darce because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-4-2011 by Darce because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-4-2011 @ 03:50 AM by TraptInTheSystem
reply to post by Darce



I think they should have chambered it in the .338 Lapua.


reply posted on 21-4-2011 @ 04:09 AM by Darce
reply to post by TraptInTheSystem



I don't think Remington makes a rifle with an m700 style action that is chambered in the .338LM. I read about one made by them but it's in a different action. They would have to go with a completely different rifle. The range of the .338LM is greater, and it goes all the way up to 300gr bullets. Maybe silencers aren't as effective with that type of cartridge?


reply posted on 21-4-2011 @ 03:39 PM by TraptInTheSystem
reply to post by Darce



I didn't know the 700 action couldn't accept the .338 Lapua. The suppressors for such a big round are also insane. I could see how that would save weight and not me as bulky.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 7 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Show us your bow
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags