It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to post by newcovenant
Police have no obligation to protect anyone. To protect and serve is just their little motto to make people think cops have some other primary purpose other than raising revenue for their jurisdiction.
Given that the average police response time is somewhere around 5-7 minutes, how many lives do you think they actually save compared to people who defend themselves successfully?
Originally posted by newcovenant
. In fact it is still being debated by the supreme court in a few domestic abuse cases.
Originally posted by JibbyJedi
They use to take advantage of me when I was young and naive, and they continue doing so today.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by JibbyJedi
They use to take advantage of me when I was young and naive, and they continue doing so today.
Most go through their entire lives without a problem with a police officer. What do you do exactly that causes you to have all these problems with police? Everyone I've ever known who had constant problems like that were either problem drunks, on drugs or actually committing crimes. Mostly they were problem drunks, starting fights and driving drunk. Some were just crazy drivers with no regard for others lives who hated Cops for protecting others from them.
One thing they all had in common was they would deny they deserved the scrutiny and usually lied about what they did.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by JibbyJedi
So you label all Cops based on the actions of a handful? I'm sorry but I'm not buying your rant here. Cop Haters are Cop Haters for a reason.
Originally posted by HenryPatrick
edit on 4/20/11 by HenryPatrick because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nyk537
This is what kills me about this argument here.
Why is this such a great victory again? Because these guys don't present ID for the sole reason that "they don't have to". BIG DEAL. Just because you don't "have to" do something doesn't mean that you should refuse to do it in every situation just to rebel against law enforcement.
Seems like more of a jerk thing to do than some kind of rebellious act of freedom.
Most law enforcement is only doing their jobs when things like this take place...it's the jerks who think they are making a point by acting stupid that cause the trouble....not the officers.
Originally posted by nyk537
Most law enforcement is only doing their jobs when things like this take place...it's the jerks who think they are making a point by acting stupid that cause the trouble....not the officers.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by nixie_nox
For one, officers are just that, officers, not lawyers.
But officers should know the laws that they are enforcing.
And why are you getting into situations that involve police and need to know your rights?
One should ALWAYS know their rights. As for getting in situations . . .
There are a multitude of situations where you are doing nothing, but the police get involved. At a cook out, driving your car, walking down the street, just to name a few. You don't always have to breaking the law to have contact with police officers.
Funny how people hate the police but I bet you dial 911 in an emergency.
Responding to emergencies is their job. To protect and to serve, remember? Most people hate that cops are revenue generators for the area that they work, and most are thuggish people who play mind games to try and corner you.
Should people be afraid of cops, or should people go about their business when cops are around? IMO, people should go about their business. Do they? No.
Here is a simple test. Next time you come across a state trooper or a speed trap, watch how many people slam on their breaks . . . even if they are going the speed limit. Tell me, why is that the case?
I have learned that actually being truthful and compliant is way easier and gets me out of more tickets then being a jerk.
Indeed. But you can be truthful and nice, and still know and assert your rights.
As for generating revenue, you really think a police department generates enough to support itself?
No. Most of the money collected gets split between the state, county, and city. They city money usually goes into the general funds to get distributed where it is needed.
That still does not negate the fact that citations are a revenue stream . . . a supplement to the tax revenue of the city/county/state. As little as that revenue may be, it is still extra income which the governmental entity did not have before.
By the way. I am an ex-officer. I was a municipal officer for 5 years, and received a few awards and commendations during that time. I resigned one year after becoming a sergeant. I resigned on my own terms, because I did not agree with the direction that law enforcement has taken.