It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by donkeystyle
I don't think this is sarcasm and why should it be? There is benefits, a stable company, and room to advance from the bottom for anyone. It's an indoor environment where people of all walks of life can work on some level, and those with more potential can work up to management.
In todays world , and yesterdays world, and tomorrows world, honest work at a stable company is always considered a good job. I have never worked a fast food joint in my life, but my girlfriend works at subway, and her manager only started working there 5 years ago, at age 24'ish, and now manages 3 subways and owns a house and has a family. That sounds great if you ask me.
Not everyone has a degree, and even many that do cannot find work.
It's not a job that starts out at 55 grand a year, but its a job that starts now. There's a lot to be said about that.
I guess many of you are too good for such a lowly job, and would rather your family starve out, or just be on welfare while trying to find something better. But people with a level head will know the value of working for any major company. Especially the ones that will promote from within.edit on 19-4-2011 by donkeystyle because: (no reason given)
What? You think "Do what Thou wilt within the three Laws" is a hard bargain for people to keep? No one "bargains." People who love to build and program robots will do so for the bliss, status, personal satisfaction, prestige, reputation, etc. People who love to make movies will make movies. People who love to solve problems will solve problems.
And again. IT IS NOT A UTOPIA. It's just a hell of a lot better for billions and billions of people. You say it won't work but you're wrong. You look at things through scarcity glasses. Read my threads in my sig - the Entropy one and the Ethical one - if you haven't already.
WTF!?! Where did THAT come from? Do tell. You're making s**t up there. Where won't I work? WalMart. Where have I applied to work? The list is very long - with 35,000 to 50,000 job applications in the last five years, for admin. asst., graphics, video, web animation (Flash), and even CHICKEN PLUCKER. I can't work jobs that require me to stand more than about 1/2 hour at a stretch - I have a rheumatological condition that precludes standing longer - but other than that, I can't say I have been overly picky.
And it is specifically for the entire community of Humanity that I spread the ideas I offer. Because I value Humanity VERY highly.
Where the company makes the money off those workers' energy at the bottom, paying THEM poorly to afford the CEO salary. Yeah. They're not slaves.
What if you care so much you want people to be aware of the wretched food they are choosing? Can you hand them that Big Mac with a smile? I guess if you don't CARE about the people you serve, then smile away, eh?
Man, get off your high horse. I have written the threads, supported them fully, and tell everyone I can about them. That is hardly "doing nothing to influence the situation." The most important thing for the ideas to succeed is for them to spread.
Seriously, dude.
Not so. People do marvelous things for bliss only. Linux is an awesome example. No one had a "work ethic" on that project. They had a Betterment Ethic, and were paid for good work in reputation, satisfaction, and bliss. It is a fallacy that any "work" ethic is needed.
First, menial tasks will be relegated to the robots (and anyone who loves to do them). And in the pre-dark ages, energy scarcity was still a problem Today We are at a UNIQUE place in Our present history: We have, for the first time, the Interweb, the robotics, and the plenum energy. With awareness and Will, We can shift from the scarcity paradigms of yesterday to a free and leisurely abundance paradigm, eliminating poverty and virtually all crime.
Originally posted by donkeystyle
OK OK, i understand your dream vision now, it is simply the perfect world you envision.
Us having every technology we could ever need, being able to design robots to do virtually everything we need done for us, without human assistance. Having infinite free energy and resources.
That vision is noble, and i've certainly had the same dream, but refusing to work today because your utopia doesn't exist is counter productive. To get to the point in your vision for humanity, we would need to further develop infrastructure and technologies.
I believe we slowly have worked towards that end since the beginning of mankind. You are simply too impatient to let it happen and complain that we should already be there. It has to evolve over time.
Yes if there was an "overmind" and everyone felt exactlyt eh same about everything, we could possibly reach your vision of utopia within years, but everyone is an individual and has to form their own opinions on some levels, not to mention all the cultural divides.
And as for being a slave if you work a job you don't "love and feel passionate about through and through"
I disagree completely. I feel like much more of a slave with an empty bank account, unable to do the things i enjoy. Being a slave to my own poverty. Your vision of utopia is basically a star trek ship where you can get everything made for you magically by asking the computer to make it happen.
Unfortunately you are seemingly against contributing to society to help us get there. You are instead complaining about having to do work in the mean time.
I'll put it to you another way. 200 years ago backbreaking labour was the standard. Because thats what people had to do to survive. There were no "robots" to do everything humans desire.
Those people worked hard to make their lives easier, they invented technologies through labour and sweat. life was hard.
And because our forefathers worked so hard, we get to work a little bit LESS hard than they had to.
And if you and i do our job correctly, our ancesters will be doing LESS physical labour than we are today.
Unfortunately your politics on the situation and your vision form a catch 22.
On one hand you want a utopia where we have incredible technological breakthroughs, but on the other hand you don't think anyone should have to work.
Well, without blood sweat and tears, these technologies won't be developed.
So i guess you'll just have to keep insulting the people out there doing the hard work
..., until we reach that point in the distant future
where everybody on earth can sit back and "find themselves" for 40 years.
Im thinking your ancestors, the ones who had no choice but to work their butts off all their life to stay alive, are just about rolling over in their graves contemplating your perspective.
Originally posted by yourmaker
i'd rather have no job then work at McDonalds. why would I put my time into a greedy corporation that manipulates it's workers and customers into believing it's "service". no thanks!
Originally posted by kimish
Originally posted by yourmaker
i'd rather have no job then work at McDonalds. why would I put my time into a greedy corporation that manipulates it's workers and customers into believing it's "service". no thanks!
Me personally, I'd rather have $5 in my pocket than $0. So yes, At least with a job I'd have some money and at least make attempts to pay my bills as opposed to just blowing them off.
Originally posted by ZiggyMojo
reply to post by Amaterasu
What? You think "Do what Thou wilt within the three Laws" is a hard bargain for people to keep? No one "bargains." People who love to build and program robots will do so for the bliss, status, personal satisfaction, prestige, reputation, etc. People who love to make movies will make movies. People who love to solve problems will solve problems.
You think everyone will stay within the "THREE LAWS"? No. Laws mean limitations, and if there is a limitation people will break it. Bottom Line. There has to be some bargaining factor. You think supply and demand will just disappear? If everyone wants French fries tomorrow but there is only enough French fries for 30,000 people.. How do you decide who gets the French Fries?
Sure there may be people that love to do the most mundane and or disgusting tasks, but do you think there will be enough to balance every job appropriately?
Do you think there will just happen to be enough people that like to collect garbage, or program robots, or build robots, or farm, that it will magically meet an equilibrium and we won't have to worry about it?
I'm sorry friend, I think you are making some drastic assumptions that really cannot be verified..
And lean heavily in the opposite direction. I come from a very diverse background and I have a lot of experience in many fields under my belt.. Some of my best friends are farmers, and some of them program device drivers for revolutionary printing hardware. I can tell you now, just because someone loves what they currently do, does not mean they are in "bliss"..
It definitely doesn't mean that farmers would all want to farm if they had the option to do anything. It's all relative to the work you do and whether you love your job or not, I bet there is something you'd rather do than what you currently do. One million astronauts, two farmers, 30 actors, 90 garbage collectors a senior programmer and a cook? I mean where is the balance in this system?
And again. IT IS NOT A UTOPIA. It's just a hell of a lot better for billions and billions of people. You say it won't work but you're wrong. You look at things through scarcity glasses. Read my threads in my sig - the Entropy one and the Ethical one - if you haven't already.
No, it is YOUR Utopia.. It is the way you view a perfect or near perfect world.
Therefore it is a Utopian Society. How are you so certain that I'm wrong when you are right? My opinion is based on fact and legitimate occurance.
Your opinion is based heavily on the desire for something that does not and never has existed.
Don't even talk to me about scarcity glasses.. I've been right where you are and thought up one million ideas as to how we could make the world better.
We could make the world better but alas, it takes effort. Posting on ATS really does not accomplish much of anything.
The only people who read ATS are people who would tend to think the same way anyhow so you really aren't reaching any new or untapped minds.
I have an extremely open and accepting/creative mind. I just am firmly planted in reality,
and I have faced troubles and been in situations that made me see things from other perspectives. 50,000 jobs at McDonald's is.. Whether you like it or not, going to save some people's lives. It is going to increase the well being of those people who otherwise didn't have a job. When you have no other avenue of support, flipping a burger is a godsend. You can say you won't work at Wal-Mart or McDonald's now.. But you have obviously never been in a position where it didn't matter what you did, you had to survive.
WTF!?! Where did THAT come from? Do tell. You're making s**t up there. Where won't I work? WalMart. Where have I applied to work? The list is very long - with 35,000 to 50,000 job applications in the last five years, for admin. asst., graphics, video, web animation (Flash), and even CHICKEN PLUCKER. I can't work jobs that require me to stand more than about 1/2 hour at a stretch - I have a rheumatological condition that precludes standing longer - but other than that, I can't say I have been overly picky.
35,000 to 50,000 is a pretty broad range... You honestly put that many out? If you did, then you must be pretty damn picky or you really turn employers off..
I mean your attitude would push a lot of employers away.
I didn't make anything up. Based on your responses you would put a company like wal-mart out of business in an instant and think you were doing all of their employees a favor because YOU think they are slaves to the corporate infrastructure.
Originally posted by whaaa
Why anyone would chose to work for a corporation that treats their employees like **** is beyond me.
Anyone with drive, ambition and not afraid to get their hands dirty should be self employed. There are a myriad of opportunities for the entrepreneur.
Start here....and good luck!
sbinfocanada.about.com...
actually, I think they pay more than I am making now, but, well, to tell ya the truth, rather be in my line of work than in a fast food joint, money isn't everything, and by the time all is said and done, a few extra pieces of penny candy isn't worth having to deal with the hassle and irratation
Originally posted by donkeystyle
reply to post by Amaterasu
Alright amaratsu, i am sorry for taking jabs at you.
You clarified your vision, and i can't disagree it would be a marvelous existence. I do see what you are driving at.
It's just so far from our current reality. I don't know why they would supress a technology that could make the entire world pollution free and unlimited free energy.
If all this stuff actually does exist, there is no explanation.
Perhaps they need to secure the world before they release these incredible technologies to the public.
I don't know. But until someone, like you who claims all this stuff is readily available, can actually display a working "free energy" machine, or "replicator" with proof in front of media, or a group of scientists, or any of the many ways you could present something with evidence before the government could even become aware of your doings, i will continue to assume it is poppycock. (nice run on sentence if i do say so)
You are advocating a message that has good intent behind it, but until someone in this world is capable of proving these technologies exist, we will be at the mercy of the current social and economic system.
And some youtube links websites is not proof. Proof is proof. Show a university assembly, show a group of scientific peers.
I have a hard time agreeing that the military has every single good technology ever made, and doesn't let anyone else use any of them. They may try, but even then someone should have easily been able to produce a prototype of one of these technologies that works. with all the rogue millionaires and billionaires, not every single rich person on this earth is part of a conspiracy to hide information.
I guess i just don't strictly believe all this stuff exists. I think it is all still in the early theoretical stages, or at best, a barely functioning prototype.
Originally posted by ZiggyMojo
reply to post by Amaterasu
My agenda is to deny ignorance. I'm sorry to inform you that your ideas presented in this thread are in some manner to me.. Ignorant. I'm taking the context of what you said and applying it to a situation. Maybe I'm wrong. I didn't attack you. I'm being honest and frank. There is no need to sugar coat my response or tip-toe. What I've read has painted a picture and that picture projects an image. An image of someone who has great ideas, but paper thin supports. Pipe dreams are great.
If you can't take the heat....
didn't make anything up. Based on your responses you would put a company like wal-mart out of business in an instant and think you were doing all of their employees a favor because YOU think they are slaves to the corporate infrastructure.