Overpopulation? Elitest Propaganda and Damned Lies Lies Lies!, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 161 times


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 08:30 AM by unityemissions
reply to post by spikey



I don't think you grasp the situation, but it's cool kid...because it really doesn't matter what you or I think on this topic. I'll keep hearing people say AGW is a farce, that scientists are liars, and that overpopulation is a myth?!

You just don't get it. Whatever.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 08:33 AM by Amaterasu
reply to post by unityemissions



One person with a tank could probably control 1,400 people... Probably not 10,000 though.

I'm just saying that with an 80% reduction, They have enough tech and equipment to easily control what's left.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 08:37 AM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to
post by spikey



I don't think you grasp the situation, but it's cool kid...because it really doesn't matter what you or I think on this topic. I'll keep hearing people say AGW is a farce, that scientists are liars, and that overpopulation is a myth?!

You just don't get it. Whatever.


What's there to get, ue? That there is plenty on this planet for all Humans, and that money stands in the way of Each of Us to live richly, is rather self-evident, as spikey showed in the OP.

Again, I ask, what is there to get?



reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 08:39 AM by spikey
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to
post by spikey



I don't think you grasp the situation, but it's cool kid...because it really doesn't matter what you or I think on this topic. I'll keep hearing people say AGW is a farce, that scientists are liars, and that overpopulation is a myth?!

You just don't get it. Whatever.


It's unfortunate that you don't appreciate what poster and i are saying on this thread, and there does appear to be a favourable meeting of minds on this issue (quite rare for an ATS thread in my experience), so taking the few replies so far given as a representative percentage of the general opinion, it's seems clear (to me at least) than there are a great many people sharing similar ideas in this area.

I realise not *everyone* is going to feel the same way, but in the real world, we only have to convince the majority of the sense of the necessary changes that will have to be made, to provide not only a sustainable future for us and the Earth, but more than that, a bright future filled with amazing opportunities for all.

And it looks like (so far) the majority are looking favourably to some of the ideas/solutions in this thread.

I respect your opinion though, and appreciate you taking the trouble to post and add to the thread.

Cheers.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 09:07 AM by newcovenant
reply to post by spikey



Excellent information and presentation. Too bad this isn't mainstream and routine practice and procedures already. Our cities now are limited resource enclosures and instead of expanding out, they subdivide in and makes people and activities cramped and under served. Price per square footage, delivery of resources, infrastructure and support all vital considerations but this is like the high speed rail. People do not want to collectively invest in solutions. States are talking about seceding thanks to joint investments by the Fed Govt now. Until we work somewhat collectively we will go backwards instead of forward from this point on I think.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 09:41 AM by spikey
reply to post by Smack



Very true.

Now we need another type of revolution to sort out the mess created by the industrial.

Thanks mate.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 09:43 AM by spikey
reply to post by newcovenant



Agreed.

We need a collaborative, rational and positive approach that will include all of us, not a few of us at the expense of most of us.

Thanks for the thanks and the post.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 11:01 AM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by unityemissions




You just don't get it. Whatever.


You, young grasshopper are the one that does not get it. Sure humans cause harm to the earth, only because TPTB have controlled how we live, and have suppressed the clean and efficient ways of life that could have us all live in abundance and harmony.

Thanks for coming out, striking out too.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 12:57 PM by ViperChili
reply to post by anon102



Eliminating all forms of foreign aid in terms of financial and agricultural would be a good place to start.

The planet, just like every other ecosystem, has a certain carrying capacity. Irresponsible breeding caused by morons who believe in an invisible sky zombie are a large cause of the population problems we will soon face.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 01:01 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
I think this over population problem is over hyped but it is indeed an issue. We are now at a point that we can not sustain the food production we are using. Yes, if we tear the entire system down and rebuild efficiently it can be fixed. The fact is we need to resort to factory farming to feed the masses, for whatever reasons, that is the fact.

Another issue is water waste. Sure, you aren't actually removing the elements that make the water, but you sure can pollute the crap out of it. Industrial waste and radioactive waste doesn't get filtered out in the ground. We've polluted entire ecosystems in this manner.

And don't forget the massive amounts of waste each human (in the west) creates each year. We have a massive garbage patch floating around the ocean right now. We have so much garbage we're building man made islands and "reclaiming" land.

Under our current systems, we're running on fumes. With global food production in the hands of a few companies, a few bad seasons and we're doomed.

Yes, there is plenty to go around, if you are willing to take what you need and only what you need. Sadly, we've proven at least in the west, we will never do this. We'll kill someone for a loaf of bread and trample someone to death for a tickle me elmo.

Yes, overpopulation is a problem, but not for the reasons THEY want you to hear and it won't be fixed with any solutions THEY offer.


I offer ways to fix things... Please see my post at the bottom of page 1 of this thread.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 01:06 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to
post by anon102



Eliminating all forms of foreign aid in terms of financial and agricultural would be a good place to start.


That sounds USA-centric... Not a planetary solution...

The planet, just like every other ecosystem, has a certain carrying capacity. Irresponsible breeding caused by morons who believe in an invisible sky zombie are a large cause of the population problems we will soon face.


Except... The planet could easily hold two times the present population and support it easily. Define "irresponsible breeding." And do you have a solution for this "irresponsible breeding?"


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 01:11 PM by gougitousakusha
reply to post by Authenticated



you dont have to kill anyone to start population control, we already have disease and disaster to take out the large numbers. all we'd have to do is start reproducing at 2 children per couple. i personally see benefits from living with less mouths to feed.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 01:29 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by ViperChili
Originally posted by Amaterasu
That sounds USA-centric... Not a planetary solution...


If all "first-world nations" eliminated all forms of assistance to 3rd world nations, it would be a viable planetary solution.


How do you see this as so?

Except... The planet could easily hold two times the present population and support it easily. Define "irresponsible breeding." And do you have a solution for this "irresponsible breeding?"


It most certainly cannot hold twice the population. Just for fun, lets see your evidence substantiating that claim.

Water is already an issue all over the planet. So is energy. There are already infrastructure problems all over, and you believe twice the amount of people is something that is supportable? Where would the funding come from?


Water would be no problem if we used Dean Kamen's purification tech and plenum ("dark"/Zero Point/radiant/orgone/...) energy to run them. And plenum energy will solve energy issues. What you may be concerned with is the MONEY to build what is needed. Turns out that if we add plenum energy (effectively infinite) the need for money will dissipate. For further information on this, please read my thread, linked in my sig called The End of Entropy.

Irresponsible breeding: Having children you cannot afford to adequately care for. As for the solution to that problem, it would have to be a multi faceted approach. Eliminating all foreign aid would result in shorter lifespans for adults, who would in turn have less time to breed. The children that were born wouldn't live very long without adequate food, water, and medical care.


Wow. That's rather cold. Let's starve people because we're too lazy to find better solutions? Better to release plenum energy.

The list of viable options would be quite lengthy.


I would not opt for any list that includes starving Humans...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



California going off!
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Ice Age Flower Blooms After 32000 Years!
  Posted 15 days ago with 79 member flags
Experts Warn Mount Fuji is Dangerously Close to Erupting
  Posted 5 days ago with 66 member flags
Man building his own island out of plastic bottles
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
Simple way to discover if your produce is GMO.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags