Originally posted by sirhc0329
This is why I love ATS. These topics that you never found in science books, or MSM.

Its unfortunate that physics is so complex, because anyone leaving high school has only had enough time in class to learn the introductory knowledge, up to about 1910.
Check your textbooks if you're a school student, and you'll see that there is (mostly) nothing in there that would surprise any physicist of that era.
Thats right, about 100 years of new information in physics is not taught because there simply isnt enough time. Lets face it, most students have enough trouble getting the basics of newtonian physics withough hassling them with quantum electrodynamics.

I dont know thats a "problem", but it gets worse by one year every year, which is why genuinely informative postings like this are great.

Congratulations. You just (I think) received my first "star and flag".

Presented very well. So much information I have butterfly's in my stomach.

You have given me the "Butterfly Effect".

Nice Job. Can't wait till your next posting.

HOLY COW!!!!! S & F!!!! This is the very first info thread I read word by word, followed every link, and till now haven't finished reading and watching most of the link yet. With this information i can share it to my family friends and will make them think I'm one heck of a genius. Thanks OP, more power

Man cant wait until i get to this part in school!!! great job op!!!

Yes,truly informative .Einstein did state,time did not exist for as the further you get away from a location the slower objects that are moving appear to move in time,to the observer.
However ,he also stated that light bends toward the observer and not as would be imagined ,like a rainbow.This einstein concurred then meant that astronomers observing a point of light in the sky were seeing it in the past and also not where it actually is ,as it would have moved ,in short if you pinned a string from you to the star in a straight line and measured its rate of distance away,where you saw it with your eyes would be billions of miles away from it(the string would be bent).

In this analogy then considering the deep field telescopes discovery that the universe is flat,would then suggest that ,as einstein stated,light bends towards us,then the stars in the sky ,technically are all in reality along the equator of the earth,the solar system and galaxy.As though we live on a orb ,with other orbs,in a blob of jelly film on a piece of glass ,spreading out by exteriorial force of a heavier gravity,speeding up,leaking inward to our universe.
So in a sense time does exist but as a ever changing set of variable forces equating to a equaling duality (evening out).When this evening out completes its cycle ,well...bang goes the theory,M-theory !
So time exists relative to where you are in a flat wave modulating universe,which is transferring gravity and electromagnetic information,unequally in both directions,and explains why DNA is formed in both directions.
sorry if its to deep.
Peace gringo.

Wonderfully put together! Thank you for your post. S&F.

I've always believed that time-travel can only be achieved by the use of a 'mind'
I know that light -that we accept is the fastest electromagnetic radiation in the
universe, travels, bends and can be manipulated.

We agree that it is this medium that we should use show how time-travel works,
but if we're to travel from event to event, what else would be needed?

Think of a time that you would wish to visit... a time that you can recall with fondness,
fear, excitement and then attempt to remember the sights, sounds and smells.
If you can do that, why you're time-travelling!

I may come off as a little niave and please forgive me if this doesn't bring anything
rational to the table, but I'm sure that if a machine was to be built to actually carry
a physical being across time, then a 'brain' or 'mind' would have to be involved.

Interesting thread.

Originally posted by Isochronic
Off topic- my last account got banned after two posts. Oh well im back again and ready to take legal action if this account gets banned.

legal action? heh
you can get banned if the owner simply decides he doesn't like you...this isn't a government run forum (that we know of anyhow...muahahaha)...its some guys personal website..just follow the rules and you should be fine.

Clearly one of those two posts did a mega violation in some respects...but talk to a moderator in u2u's if you need clarification (they are semi-reasonable and helpful...but banned after 2 posts...hmm...sounds like some heavy trolling)

Fantastic thread, S+F! It's good to see such high calibre coming from the UK. Looking forward to finding the time to read it fully.

---

---